MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1989844410 · doi:10.1353/sew.0.0173

Arcady and After

2009· article· en· W1989844410 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mairi MacInnes

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œSewanee review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIrish and British Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGray (unit)AmusementMillerVisual artsWifeArtArt historyHistoryAdvertisingPsychologyPolitical scienceLawBusiness

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Arcady and After Mairi MacInnes (bio) Maggy Johnston and Piet VanDongen, a married couple who had lived and worked abroad for most of their married life, decided several years before they were due to retire that they would find a moorland village in the north of England, where she had grown up, and buy a pretty house there. They would fit out the house, cultivate a garden, entertain old friends, make new ones, write books, and travel. And so it came to pass. One day Appleby-le-Moors found strangers moving into the old miller’s house on the green, and Maggy and Piet found people smiling at them on the street as if they knew who they were. “Why Appleby?” the postmaster wondered when Maggy introduced herself in his village shop. “Because it’s always been a lovely village,” Maggy said. “It was, and it still is.” “And your husband?” “The Netherlands are not far away. Overnight from Hull.” “Welcome,” said the postmaster, the former accounting manager for a firm making agricultural machinery. “May you be happy here.” “I have a lot of looking round to do,” Maggy confessed. “Not a difficult task. And it’s very moving. To find places much the same, you know.” The postmaster looked at the neat gray-haired lady in her gray trousers and black quilted jacket, her silver earrings and necklace, and took in her amusement. “It’s so beautiful!” she added. “For years I’ve lived in places where I didn’t particularly want to live—Chicago and Toronto and Los Angeles, places where we worked. Interesting, of course, but without the resonance I find here.” “And your husband?” “He can’t get over it. Where are the dark satanic mills? he asks. Where are the sooty working-class terraces and the factory chimneys and the stick figures of Mr. Lowry?” “You can get to Bradford by train quite easily,” said the postmaster humorously. “We’re in a ‘Place of Outstanding Natural Beauty,’ don’t forget.” [End Page 410] “As if that nailed it.” Yet surprise bore Piet along like a wave. Why? Maggy wondered, walking home with the newspaper. But beauty is always going to be foreign, and Maggy needed familiarity. That is why she decided to go with Piet back to the boarding school a few miles off, where she had been happy long ago, and where she might anchor her shapeless longing on the once familiar. By no coincidence both house and gardens of the school were outstanding of their kind, the eighteenth-century grand English or Scottish kind. That had provided a good reason for Maggy’s parents to send her there, so some of the distinction might rub off on her, rough little creature as she’d been. And that was the good reason too for Piet, an architect and connoisseur of houses, to accompany her. The house had been designed about 1700 by a gentleman of the neighborhood, one of those amateurs of the classical age who erected a single masterpiece before going back to private life. To reach it Maggy and Piet drove through two sets of huge wrought-iron gates and two lots of parkland, all grass and vast oaks, and then whirled over a graveled courtyard to the double staircase of the house that led up to the entrance above. “Enough to make you turn in your suit,” said Piet, who had picked up his splendid English before the colloquialisms of television. “A nice color, this stone. Nice and warm. Still the building is hideous. Guess why it’s a school.” “Come, Piet, it’s absolutely beautiful.” “In the Netherlands people have more respect for the public than to do this sort of thing. Showing off in this totally unscrupulous way.” Maggy laughed. “You’re a snob, Piet. Yet you’re right—when the house burnt down in the 1880s, the family had the cheek to build it again.” “Bad electrics, sure.” “They liked grandeur. Someone told me that the local vicar was incensed at the time. He wrote that tenants in the village lived in leaking hovels. He said that the lord of the manor had a moral duty to tend...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,473
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,751

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,002
Communication savante0,0120,006
Science ouverte0,0020,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4730,249

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œSewanee reviewMême sujetIrish and British StudiesTravaux en français237 207