MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989844410 · doi:10.1353/sew.0.0173

Arcady and After

2009· article· en· W1989844410 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mairi MacInnes

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œSewanee review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGray (unit)AmusementMillerVisual artsWifeArtArt historyHistoryAdvertisingPsychologyPolitical scienceLawBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arcady and After Mairi MacInnes (bio) Maggy Johnston and Piet VanDongen, a married couple who had lived and worked abroad for most of their married life, decided several years before they were due to retire that they would find a moorland village in the north of England, where she had grown up, and buy a pretty house there. They would fit out the house, cultivate a garden, entertain old friends, make new ones, write books, and travel. And so it came to pass. One day Appleby-le-Moors found strangers moving into the old miller’s house on the green, and Maggy and Piet found people smiling at them on the street as if they knew who they were. “Why Appleby?” the postmaster wondered when Maggy introduced herself in his village shop. “Because it’s always been a lovely village,” Maggy said. “It was, and it still is.” “And your husband?” “The Netherlands are not far away. Overnight from Hull.” “Welcome,” said the postmaster, the former accounting manager for a firm making agricultural machinery. “May you be happy here.” “I have a lot of looking round to do,” Maggy confessed. “Not a difficult task. And it’s very moving. To find places much the same, you know.” The postmaster looked at the neat gray-haired lady in her gray trousers and black quilted jacket, her silver earrings and necklace, and took in her amusement. “It’s so beautiful!” she added. “For years I’ve lived in places where I didn’t particularly want to live—Chicago and Toronto and Los Angeles, places where we worked. Interesting, of course, but without the resonance I find here.” “And your husband?” “He can’t get over it. Where are the dark satanic mills? he asks. Where are the sooty working-class terraces and the factory chimneys and the stick figures of Mr. Lowry?” “You can get to Bradford by train quite easily,” said the postmaster humorously. “We’re in a ‘Place of Outstanding Natural Beauty,’ don’t forget.” [End Page 410] “As if that nailed it.” Yet surprise bore Piet along like a wave. Why? Maggy wondered, walking home with the newspaper. But beauty is always going to be foreign, and Maggy needed familiarity. That is why she decided to go with Piet back to the boarding school a few miles off, where she had been happy long ago, and where she might anchor her shapeless longing on the once familiar. By no coincidence both house and gardens of the school were outstanding of their kind, the eighteenth-century grand English or Scottish kind. That had provided a good reason for Maggy’s parents to send her there, so some of the distinction might rub off on her, rough little creature as she’d been. And that was the good reason too for Piet, an architect and connoisseur of houses, to accompany her. The house had been designed about 1700 by a gentleman of the neighborhood, one of those amateurs of the classical age who erected a single masterpiece before going back to private life. To reach it Maggy and Piet drove through two sets of huge wrought-iron gates and two lots of parkland, all grass and vast oaks, and then whirled over a graveled courtyard to the double staircase of the house that led up to the entrance above. “Enough to make you turn in your suit,” said Piet, who had picked up his splendid English before the colloquialisms of television. “A nice color, this stone. Nice and warm. Still the building is hideous. Guess why it’s a school.” “Come, Piet, it’s absolutely beautiful.” “In the Netherlands people have more respect for the public than to do this sort of thing. Showing off in this totally unscrupulous way.” Maggy laughed. “You’re a snob, Piet. Yet you’re right—when the house burnt down in the 1880s, the family had the cheek to build it again.” “Bad electrics, sure.” “They liked grandeur. Someone told me that the local vicar was incensed at the time. He wrote that tenants in the village lived in leaking hovels. He said that the lord of the manor had a moral duty to tend...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œSewanee reviewSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207