Pro–con debate: is codeine a drug that still has a useful role in pediatric practice?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Codeine is a drug that remains in world-wide clinical usage despite the availability of other opioids that are far better understood in terms of pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and side effects. Its continuing usage in clinical practice highlights a paradoxical inconsistency in the prescribing habits of codeine in the pediatric and pediatric anesthetic world. On one hand, codeine has been used extensively for many years as step-down drug from controlled opioids such as morphine, and as such continues to be regarded as ‘safe and effective’ by physicians and the general public. In most countries, it can be bought by the general public without a doctor’s prescription, which represents a tacit endorsement of its reliability. On the other hand, there is a body of evidence indicating highly variable unpredictable analgesia and side effects compared to other agents, with potential extremes of response varying from lack of effect to life-threatening complications. At the heart of the debate is the question of what are the active components of codeine and its metabolites. If codeine was being developed currently, a significant amount of new scientific clinical data would be required before it would become licensed. In trying to come to a balanced view, it is useful to try to look at both sides of the argument: from that of an experienced clinician who uses the drug regularly and from a clinical pharmacologist who can put the evidence from this stance into context. Codeine is commonly used to provide postoperative pain relief in children. It is listed by the World Health Organization (1) as the second step on the analgesic ladder for the treatment of cancer pain. It is added in if simple oral analgesics [Step 1 – paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs)] have been inadequate, and before introducing potent opioids (Step 3). Its role in postoperative pain in children is very similar. It is given for postoperative analgesia after many common children’s operations as part of a multimodal approach, when paracetamol and NSAIDs are insufficient to control pain. In addition, with the extension of day-stay surgery and reduced in-patient stay, this opioid is particularly useful in providing analgesia as part of an analgesic cocktail following discharge home. Codeine is an effective analgesic for moderately severe pain available for easy oral administration both in hospital and at home. It is available in a formulation (syrup) which is easy to give by both nurses and parents and is easy to prescribe in that it is not regarded as a controlled substance. The effective dose has been established by long-term clinical usage and is easy to remember It should not be the drug of choice for acute severe pain (e.g: postcraniotomy) where morphine remains the drug of choice, but can be used effectively for moderate pain. Specific problems in a minority of patients (newborns) should not prohibit its use for the majority. No safer, fully investigated, more effective oral agents for moderate pain exist. Recent work suggests we are still struggling to provide effective pain relief for many children after surgery. A recent snap shot study of the level of pain experienced by hospitalized children in the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto showed 64% of children had experienced moderate or severe pain in the 24 h before interview, with 23% in significant pain actually at the time of interview (2). There are no snap shot studies showing the typical levels of pain experienced by surgical children after discharge home. As pediatric anesthetists, we have a moral and ethical duty to provide effective pain relief for children after surgery, but in general, the available analgesic options have not changed significantly in the last decade. These include potent opioid analgesia such as morphine, weak opioids such as codeine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol, and local anesthetics. Both ketamine and clonidine have uses in specific situations endorsed by enthusiastic individuals, but they have failed to enter the mainstream of commonly used analgesic agents. With our limited armamentarium, it is crucially important that in our quest for scientific evidence-based purity, we do not discard a useful, safe, and effective agent when more current strategies are still struggling to provide reliable pain relief to our pediatric population. Codeine has been used for many years as an analgesic, but remains controversial. A recent study concluded that ‘The myth that codeine is a potent and efficacious analgesic must be exposed so that clinicians make more rational choices when managing and treating pain (3).’ Similarly, Williams and colleagues, in a review of codeine in paediatric medicine, concluded that ‘The popularity of codeine in children is not supported by convincing data of its efficacy or suitability, despite its apparent good safety record (4).’ If it is clearly so inappropriate to continue using agents that are ineffective, then why is codeine still being used? From the perspective of the practicing clinical anesthetist, there are three important questions to consider: Is codeine an effective analgesic? Is it safe? Are there better alternatives? In answering these questions, the underlying pharmacokinetics is relevant, but only in so far as it helps us to answer these questions. In the United Kingdom, no central records are kept of the number of prescriptions for codeine preparations issued by hospital pharmacies per year. However, discussions with colleagues across the United Kingdom suggest that codeine is still a commonly used analgesic and is felt to be a valuable agent. Nevertheless, clinical dogma is not enough and begs the question: ‘Is there a body of clinical evidence to support or refute its use?’ This is difficult with codeine as, along with many other established agents, there are no large randomized controlled trials of codeine in discreet, age-specific pediatric populations, and clinical situations. It is therefore necessary to consider adult studies to decide whether codeine is a useful and effective as an analgesic. While this is not ideal given the known differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics that occur with maturation, the available data from other opioids would indicate that the major maturational changes in drug action occur within the first year of life (5, 6). Codeine is most commonly used in combination with paracetamol. A Cochrane Database review in 1998 compared the effectiveness of a range of single doses of paracetamol alone and in combination with codeine for moderate to severe pain (7). They calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) as a measure of analgesic efficacy. NNT was defined as the number of patients needed to receive a treatment for one patient to achieve at least 50% pain relief over 4–6 h compared to placebo. For postoperative pain, paracetamol 1000 mg had a NNT of 4.6 (95% confidence interval 3.8–5.4). The NNT for paracetamol 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg was 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.5–2.6). This figure was derived from data on only 127 patients in two trials and so is unreliable. The evidence was reassessed in 2001 by the Pain Research Unit of the University of Oxford using slightly broader but still stringent study inclusion criteria (8). They were able to identify six additional trials of paracetamol 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg. With greater patient numbers, the number NNT for these therapeutic doses of paracetamol and codeine was 2.2 (confidence interval 1.7–2.9). The addition of codeine to paracetamol would appear to provide improved analgesia as a single dose in adults. These results may not reflect the true value of codeine as an analgesic. Codeine is not given as a single dose with a single dose of paracetamol but on a regular basis. A clinical study using extraction of the third molar tooth as a standardized pain experience showed pronounced improvement in pain relief with the second dose compared to the first dose of codeine 60 mg orally (9). For the experienced clinical anesthetist, the postoperative visit is as important as the preoperative assessment. It highlights the effectiveness of the initial part of the plan for postoperative analgesia and any associated morbidity. The outcome once discharged from hospital is unseen by anesthetists but falls to primary care. Wolf (10), in an editorial, on day case surgery almost a decade ago, highlighted the situation of initially good pain relief in hospital not continuing once discharged home. Any child or parent will testify that pain does not stop as the child leaves hospital. Tonsillectomy remains one of the commonest operations undertaken on children. It causes considerable pain lasting more than 7 days. The pattern is of intense or moderately intense pain for the first 3 days, followed by a gradual decline over the next 4 days (11). Pain assessment and management falls to parents or guardians. There are no published studies on pain relief in children at home with different analgesic regimes with or without codeine. Three years ago, the author (MT) was prepared to consider the view that codeine was not helpful as an analgesic and prospectively audited 60 tonsillectomies postoperatively. All were 23 h discharges and were advised to administer therapeutic doses of both paracetamol and ibuprofen on a regular basis for a week. They were asked to measure usual and worst levels of pain experienced on a daily basis using the Wong and Baker Faces scales and were telephoned days 3 and 5 postoperatively. Pain scores for worst pain experienced in previous 24 h were a median of 4 of 5 on Day 2 for both parent and child assessments remaining at 3 on Days 4 and 5. Fourteen of sixteen (23%) children had consulted their general practitioner by Day 5 because of waking in the night (commonly between 2 and 4 AM) with significant pain. Since then we have added codeine elixir to be given as required for breakthrough pain. Ongoing prospective audit is under way with only 1 of the first 29 (3%) children seeing general practitioners with inadequate pain relief by Day 5 postoperatively. This personal experience is confirmed by Ewah (12). She prospectively followed up 100 Day Case tonsillectomies for 3 days after operation. All received ibuprofen, paracetamol, and codeine regularly. None had visited general practitioners by Day 3 (personal communication), and low median pain scores were reported. Experience from two separate anesthetists auditing the effectiveness of their routine clinical practice attests to the effectiveness of codeine for pain relief at home following intermediate surgery. There are two reasons why this information does not exist in the scientific literature. First, there is no financial drive from the pharmaceutical industry to investigate this established and cheap agent. Second, the increasingly regulation around clinical investigations has reduced the ability of practicing clinical anesthetists from undertaking simple patient studies. Codeine, like all drugs, is not free of problems. It should not to be given intravenously as it may cause profound hypotension (possibly from histamine release) and grand mal convulsions. In addition, there are a number of specific patient groups where its use is associated with significant risk of complications. There is a recent, well-documented case of death of an infant (1 month old), who received combination medications including codeine as an anti-tussive and developed profound respiratory depression at home. The total codeine dose was 1.26 mg·kg−1 in a 6-h period (13). The use of codeine is also now not advisable in breastfeeding mothers. A case is reported of a breastfed baby dying from respiratory depression (14). Genotype analysis revealed that the mother to have a gene duplication (three functional CYP 2D6 alleles) and thus to be an ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM) of codeine to morphine. Analysis revealed high levels of morphine in expressed breast milk. As clinicians, we use codeine orally on a regular basis as part of a multimodal approach to pain management for a number of days at home. The children are over the age of 1 year and usually otherwise well. The earlier case reports are important but do not contraindicate our use of codeine for the majority. Despite its widespread clinical use, there has been only one recent case report of apnea in a child after oral codeine (15). It was attributed to the child being an UM of codeine to morphine. Subsequent correspondence casts very considerable doubt on the claims made in the case report. Therefore, use of codeine for many years and in many patients suggests a good safety record. If one accepts that codeine is an analgesic, then the arguments against its use include concerns relating to: Pharmacokinetics (genetic polymorphism). Adverse effects (side effects) The first is that the analgesic effect of codeine is because of its conversion to morphine by an enzyme showing substantial genetic polymorphism. The enzyme system involved is the cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme system. Nine percent of UK patients are estimated to have low levels of the enzyme and are described as poor metabolizers (PM) (4). They form low levels of morphine and therefore would be expected to get little or no analgesia from morphine. A number of individuals show enzyme duplication and are described as UMs. They may produce abnormally high levels of morphine and are therefore at risk of profound respiratory depression. Clinically, we do not know the genotype of any individual postoperative child, and thus, we are at risk of under or overdosing the child. The case that codeine works by conversion to morphine appears to be unproven. Normally, very little of the total dose of codeine is actually metabolized by CYP 2D6 to morphine, the range being between 0.5% and 2–3%. Eighty percent of codeine is directly metabolized by the phase 2 uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT) enzymes of the liver to form codeine-6-glucuronide (C6G). Veer et al. (16) have postulated that C6G is responsible for most of the analgesic action of codeine by activity at mu receptors. Interested readers are referred to Armstrong and Cozza (17) for a fuller discussion. Codeine has been regarded by some as having all the disadvantages of morphine without the advantages, meaning high levels of side effects without analgesia. Codeine certainly causes This is and is There is little evidence of high of other side effects. The Cochrane review that the addition of codeine to paracetamol not in a significant in the of and However, they a in the of two side effects and with the addition of codeine. If it is true that codeine is little more than an of morphine, then from a perspective should we be children home of low dose morphine than This is with In the United Kingdom, codeine is as a drug under the terms of the of and only a 5 drug not in under The of The 5 oral codeine from almost all of the controlled is a 2 This very specific when prescribing the including that the drug is kept in hospital in a and a of drug administration to be kept in with the These would make routine of low dose oral morphine as home from Day Case almost Are any of the opioid better for providing acute postoperative pain relief than is not for children under years of is not under the age of and has no pediatric at There are very little data available to if any of these agents are to codeine. Codeine or is an opioid used for its analgesic, anti-tussive and Codeine is an in in commonly from to is of other active analgesic and analgesic action is its morphine. Codeine was first from in but codeine is from morphine the of Codeine use has in pediatric from its years when postoperative analgesia after and when it was routine in for of its use have been made The use of this for pediatric analgesia remains may with the that use of better analgesic drugs and Codeine is a of morphine, so why not use may be inadequate after oral or codeine. of morphine by patient or analgesia Codeine six that of morphine for morphine by and are in children. This is not the case for codeine. pharmacokinetics of codeine is not fully is not reported. gene that a drug are not in common for preparations that have effectiveness are of available paracetamol 1000 mg codeine 60 is a administration for codeine is associated with effects. is now used in children because it codeine is because it can cause and convulsions. administration is associated with Codeine is a drug to both and from its use as an analgesic, and agent. availability from to In some countries, it is available without as combination preparations from in doses varying from to These preparations of paracetamol, or that codeine when patients this analgesic Codeine is as a drug of and and following codeine use has been reported the and of morphine. is a opioid analgesic in but the ability of hospital to administer morphine can be by The drug is in a the to which may be by one individual and two may be necessary for codeine make it an opioid The popularity of drug on the opioid can be by Codeine has for than morphine and reduced of its analgesic effect may be its morphine. is to be responsible for some but data are analgesic effect for codeine is apparent with dose only effects. This has been to a analgesia being morphine but effects because of codeine There is little evidence for the that codeine causes such as and respiratory compared with other opioids (4). is the major but are P450 enzyme to and to morphine Codeine is also in the is to that in in the the other the of codeine with age has not been it is expected to that of morphine, because is the major where is by 1 year of age codeine is with 50% of the dose first occur and the is h in is to that by the the is associated with variable The pharmacokinetics of codeine is described in children despite use over A of of and a of have been described in but there are data pediatric The is because of that of an infant is to It would be useful to of the because this enzyme is central to analgesic In studies suggest that enzyme activity over the first month of life to of adult activity by days There are no in data or this in However, is drug with by from age where is per and of the value by These data are with in but the of on the in pharmacokinetics remains to be data suggest that morphine from codeine will be very low in of the with The of this on the activity almost no analgesic effect in and that there may be effect but this effect is than 60 in the gene have been on the number of or active an individual can be as or with active are as metabolizers of are This with For of and of have functional and codeine should be effective for analgesia in these Codeine has analgesic effect in the but effects or is only in of a of action for this that conversion of codeine to morphine the amount of morphine available from codeine. of in the drug in this age such as and and of and the of medications for the enzyme may Codeine is potent than morphine 1 60 mg of codeine only has morphine of mg. codeine is with 50% of the dose first Codeine has because conversion to morphine is necessary for analgesic the first effect after oral morphine of morphine The NNT to produce 50% pain relief for 4–6 h in moderate to severe pain is a useful measure of The combination paracetamol 1000 60 mg better analgesia than codeine 60 mg or paracetamol 1000 mg the effect of analgesic Codeine continues to be used for postoperative analgesia after This practice from the that codeine causes and respiratory depression than morphine, despite data showing morphine is more lasting and a safety data indicate that postoperative pain would be more with morphine than with codeine, results also suggest that severe pain is not a because only two doses of morphine were required codeine mg pain relief in of the patients with postoperative adult are now used in pediatric and it would to analgesic treatment with a simple analgesic and to a dose of morphine if Codeine continues to be used for pain where it is associated with postoperative than morphine providing postoperative analgesia This is in to the effect reported when codeine is with paracetamol In addition, the morphine is after an of morphine than that associated with an codeine dose given is more after morphine mg·kg−1 than after codeine The of after morphine mg·kg−1 was 50% are used in and of morphine doses is associated with management of pain is in approach local paracetamol, and can be or at least be to agents such as with morphine to While the the use of codeine in pediatric there are no data to this drug in to other Adverse drug associated with the use of codeine are common to and However, it appears that patients to many of these effects with depression is the major effect that concerns pediatric This in to a from morphine when mother used codeine The an more morphine when codeine than most do A child experienced apnea in following a dose of codeine 2 days after an anesthetic for A genetic to ultra-rapid of codeine into morphine in and apnea was These question the value of this drug in pain an UM genotype which is particularly in and are at risk to from respiratory depression The decline in codeine from pediatric the and of pediatric pain and of analgesic such as morphine and paracetamol where the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are understood have become for and have become practice the so of postoperative are their new drugs such as have had in popularity over codeine. The of drugs is that they are usually by new agents that have improved therapeutic and risk would include agents local and and anesthetic and then do that despite its codeine continues to be so codeine continues to be used for a number of it appears to work when used in combination with other weak oral analgesics such as paracetamol. It is available in an oral formulation by on and no better has become is an opioid that has been used over in Codeine, like that has now almost from is morphine it is commonly used of because it is available as an oral and it is with paracetamol. It may be over the NSAIDs for postoperative despite data to safety and reduced postoperative and with of paracetamol and lack of of the pharmacokinetics have in reduced administration doses with reduced drug to the analgesic has some data showing the effectiveness of codeine to our available analgesic In addition, availability over the Both have that there are with being able to provide effective analgesia at home in children without using drugs such as morphine that can be associated with are the to codeine in providing reliable analgesia and what would from clinical This is an important would not be having this debate if we had all the codeine in pediatric it is important to why and we are using codeine at and then consider in that The of codeine for is to provide analgesia for moderately severe pain where we know the combination of paracetamol NSAIDs to be The only in of codeine in is in with NSAIDs is a and the of patients are home with this The of these drugs remains and on The is because some studies show no to paracetamol to is being used increasingly in our despite It should be that because a drug is not for pediatric use, this does not its clinical evidence is available to support the use of or other opioids agents in to have no first experience of the use of for the management of pain in children. The available is also very A recent review had to only that of in the of postoperative analgesics in children is It will only codeine in practice if we have good studies the clinical effectiveness and side effects of codeine in pediatric to the lack of pediatric studies postoperative analgesia after discharge from hospital. data suggest that the of from practice will have little is but the high of in children can be a data from postoperative pain suggest pain scores for compared to the of and was in given codeine data suggest in given codeine over this may not be a in children. The of is also the system responsible for codeine and individuals may be as or of of the and greater analgesic efficacy of are reported in metabolizers with reduced and morphine is an to codeine in hospital can be and use of hospital. using and are for but not for postoperative analgesia. such as or are also use, but have not or review to be used by most is available in only a opioids codeine and are in of the opioids from pain in at home in both and children. In some may be the only weak opioid used many drugs, the safety of codeine to be on years of so that no individual drug can be safe, the with therapeutic effects and side effects are this of clinical and despite the case reports by both should we that in some clinical such as pediatric where the drug has a record we should continue with this that there is very little in the pediatric to support that codeine in the a and effective analgesic in combination with other drugs for moderate postoperative pain. It is important that we do not continue what we have been but actually audit the effectiveness of our In it is important that we look at the pain and side effects experienced by our children following discharge from review our analgesic prescribing and for whether codeine is valuable or It is also important that we do not use codeine where other drugs are more It is not the treatment of choice for acute severe pain. would that oral not morphine also has a record and is an after pediatric Pain management is increasingly in the of a than individual codeine use by in other will It may be to have a approach to pediatric pain a hospital than management in one adult data and in 50% of patients after with compared with with morphine, and with codeine While codeine is associated with and than morphine remains the It is to that both have their both that codeine is to as a drug in pediatric for the there are and clinical arguments against codeine, the drug still has a central in and moderate pain years of to using of codeine with paracetamol and may pain management in children with to moderate pain. For more severe pain, there are good arguments to use oral morphine in to codeine. This is in a hospital where controlled drugs can be from a of the of safe, and effective opioid administration become more difficult because of drug may show for analgesia at home but an evidence against an active other agents have been to be more effective in a home with codeine is to in its current
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,035 | 0,119 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,031 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,029 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,036 | 0,062 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».