MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1991225964 · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000000641

Securing opioid substitution treatment access and quality for people who inject drugs

2015· editorial· en· W1991225964 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrizia Carrieri, Luis Sagaon‐Teyssier, Perrine Roux

Notice bibliographique

RevueAIDS · 2015
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAix-Marseille Université
Mots-clésDiscontinuationMedicinePharmacyConfoundingReceiptFamily medicinePsychiatryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In this issue of AIDS, Nosyk et al.[1] present significant results about the causal effect of opioid substitution treatment (OST) on adherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART). Their study included a large database of 1852 HIV-infected, opioid-dependent individuals in British Columbia (Canada) and used a complex and consistent methodology to show the causal link between receiving OST and ART adherence. Their findings showed that individuals receiving OST are 70% more likely to be ART-adherent. Adherence assessment was based on pharmacy refill, which is an appropriate measure of ART discontinuation or interruption, two events that can seriously compromise ART success. This study represents a major advance in the field of access to care for people who inject drugs (PWID) for two main reasons. The first reason is related to the identification of a causal link between OST receipt and ART adherence using an innovative approach able to estimate the causal effect by controlling time-varying confounding in the exposure-outcome relationship. The time-varying relationship between OST and ART adherence expresses itself in several ways: individuals receiving OST are more likely to start ART and vice versa [2]; time on OST can stabilize their lives, promote healthy behaviours including ART adherence and foster long-term virological response to ART in OST-ART treated patients [3]. To date, the statistical methods most used to study this relationship have been generalized linear models that consider that all potential predictors have the same level of importance in explaining the outcome (ART adherence). The difficulty to control such time-varying confounding using the classic methods of analysis has raised doubts about the causal effect of OST on ART success. Instead, the method used by Nosyk et al.[1] is based on a marginal structural model that offers the possibility to make causal inference, by accounting for the reciprocal interaction between OST and ART adherence in a longitudinal setting. The weights estimated in the first stage of the model allow the time-varying confounding of this relationship can be controlled for. Such weighting creates a pseudo-population in which exposure is independent of the measured confounders [4]. The association found is also robust, as confirmed by sensitivity analyses. The second reason is related to the external validity of the results, as the causal relationship found, according to the authors, is valid under the Canadian model of care for HIV and opioid dependence, which is characterized by universal access to OST and ART for PWID. This model also implies OST receipt following international guidelines, that is appropriately prescribed OST dose to assure its effectiveness on opioid dependence [5]. Nevertheless, the results by Nosyk et al.[1] remain valid for many other countries already using or starting similar models for expanded and free access to care for PWID. These models also have public health benefits in the community of PWID because high ART/OST coverage is a guarantee of reduced risk of both sexual/parenteral transmission [6] and HIV resistance because of sustained ART adherence [7]. Moreover, although free universal access to HIV and drug dependence care may seem an expensive model to some, the individual and public health benefits remain undeniable and outweigh the costs [2]. The key message of this study is that OST enhances ART adherence (and ensures long-term response to ART) if both treatments are accessible, free and if there are no major structural barriers causing treatment interruptions. Despite the considerable effort by countries in tackling drug-use driven HIV epidemics [8], several structural barriers continue to compromise the effectiveness of comprehensive OST/ART. In many countries, PWID report that fear of registration is a deterrent to seeking treatment, as individuals must accept to have their names added to government registries shared with the police [2]. Moreover, although OST programmes are slowly replacing drug detention centres in many regions in Malaysia, Vietnam and China, police crackdowns and imprisonment still constitute a major cause of OST and ART discontinuation [8]. The lack of training of prescribing physicians may result in inappropriate doses being prescribed or drug abstinence during OST being requested, both of which can cause drop-outs and relapse into drug use [8]. It is also clear that asking PWID – a group with very limited resources that has an easy access to the drug market – for additional fees for treatment can compromise any attempt at social insertion. Armed conflict can also have dramatic repercussions on OST access. One particular case is Ukraine, a country with one of the highest prevalences of HIV among drug users, where the vast OST programme was introduced as a joint governmental and civil society initiative [9]. Following the recent annexation of the Crimean Autonomous Republic and the city of Sevastopol by the Russian Federation, Russia has prohibited OST in these areas. Consequently, the Ukrainian government has had to implement a pragmatic plan to ensure continuity of OST, HIV and tuberculosis (TB) treatment for patients who have moved to other parts of Ukraine [9]. All these structural barriers threaten OST access and quality, and discredit its effectiveness as an individual and public health intervention. An international global initiative continues to be needed to promote and secure optimal OST-ART models of care for PWID. The rising use of stimulants and synthetic drugs worldwide and particularly in some Asian countries [10] is a rising health problem requiring innovative responses to reduce their harms. Support for pragmatic research to address HIV risk or ART failure in stimulant and synthetic drug users is urgently needed and requires a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to address and coordinate targeted public health actions in a timely manner. To conclude, the results from Nosyck et al.[1] represent the final step in confirming the relationship between optimized OST delivery and ART response in drug-using populations. International efforts are now needed to continue the scale-up of similar models of care and to secure existing models, especially in critical contexts. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,210
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,773

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,425
Écart entre enseignants0,371 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAIDSMême sujetHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsTravaux en français237 207