MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991225964 · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000000641

Securing opioid substitution treatment access and quality for people who inject drugs

2015· editorial· en· W1991225964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrizia Carrieri, Luis Sagaon‐Teyssier, Perrine Roux

Bibliographic record

VenueAIDS · 2015
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAix-Marseille Université
KeywordsDiscontinuationMedicinePharmacyConfoundingReceiptFamily medicinePsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this issue of AIDS, Nosyk et al.[1] present significant results about the causal effect of opioid substitution treatment (OST) on adherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART). Their study included a large database of 1852 HIV-infected, opioid-dependent individuals in British Columbia (Canada) and used a complex and consistent methodology to show the causal link between receiving OST and ART adherence. Their findings showed that individuals receiving OST are 70% more likely to be ART-adherent. Adherence assessment was based on pharmacy refill, which is an appropriate measure of ART discontinuation or interruption, two events that can seriously compromise ART success. This study represents a major advance in the field of access to care for people who inject drugs (PWID) for two main reasons. The first reason is related to the identification of a causal link between OST receipt and ART adherence using an innovative approach able to estimate the causal effect by controlling time-varying confounding in the exposure-outcome relationship. The time-varying relationship between OST and ART adherence expresses itself in several ways: individuals receiving OST are more likely to start ART and vice versa [2]; time on OST can stabilize their lives, promote healthy behaviours including ART adherence and foster long-term virological response to ART in OST-ART treated patients [3]. To date, the statistical methods most used to study this relationship have been generalized linear models that consider that all potential predictors have the same level of importance in explaining the outcome (ART adherence). The difficulty to control such time-varying confounding using the classic methods of analysis has raised doubts about the causal effect of OST on ART success. Instead, the method used by Nosyk et al.[1] is based on a marginal structural model that offers the possibility to make causal inference, by accounting for the reciprocal interaction between OST and ART adherence in a longitudinal setting. The weights estimated in the first stage of the model allow the time-varying confounding of this relationship can be controlled for. Such weighting creates a pseudo-population in which exposure is independent of the measured confounders [4]. The association found is also robust, as confirmed by sensitivity analyses. The second reason is related to the external validity of the results, as the causal relationship found, according to the authors, is valid under the Canadian model of care for HIV and opioid dependence, which is characterized by universal access to OST and ART for PWID. This model also implies OST receipt following international guidelines, that is appropriately prescribed OST dose to assure its effectiveness on opioid dependence [5]. Nevertheless, the results by Nosyk et al.[1] remain valid for many other countries already using or starting similar models for expanded and free access to care for PWID. These models also have public health benefits in the community of PWID because high ART/OST coverage is a guarantee of reduced risk of both sexual/parenteral transmission [6] and HIV resistance because of sustained ART adherence [7]. Moreover, although free universal access to HIV and drug dependence care may seem an expensive model to some, the individual and public health benefits remain undeniable and outweigh the costs [2]. The key message of this study is that OST enhances ART adherence (and ensures long-term response to ART) if both treatments are accessible, free and if there are no major structural barriers causing treatment interruptions. Despite the considerable effort by countries in tackling drug-use driven HIV epidemics [8], several structural barriers continue to compromise the effectiveness of comprehensive OST/ART. In many countries, PWID report that fear of registration is a deterrent to seeking treatment, as individuals must accept to have their names added to government registries shared with the police [2]. Moreover, although OST programmes are slowly replacing drug detention centres in many regions in Malaysia, Vietnam and China, police crackdowns and imprisonment still constitute a major cause of OST and ART discontinuation [8]. The lack of training of prescribing physicians may result in inappropriate doses being prescribed or drug abstinence during OST being requested, both of which can cause drop-outs and relapse into drug use [8]. It is also clear that asking PWID – a group with very limited resources that has an easy access to the drug market – for additional fees for treatment can compromise any attempt at social insertion. Armed conflict can also have dramatic repercussions on OST access. One particular case is Ukraine, a country with one of the highest prevalences of HIV among drug users, where the vast OST programme was introduced as a joint governmental and civil society initiative [9]. Following the recent annexation of the Crimean Autonomous Republic and the city of Sevastopol by the Russian Federation, Russia has prohibited OST in these areas. Consequently, the Ukrainian government has had to implement a pragmatic plan to ensure continuity of OST, HIV and tuberculosis (TB) treatment for patients who have moved to other parts of Ukraine [9]. All these structural barriers threaten OST access and quality, and discredit its effectiveness as an individual and public health intervention. An international global initiative continues to be needed to promote and secure optimal OST-ART models of care for PWID. The rising use of stimulants and synthetic drugs worldwide and particularly in some Asian countries [10] is a rising health problem requiring innovative responses to reduce their harms. Support for pragmatic research to address HIV risk or ART failure in stimulant and synthetic drug users is urgently needed and requires a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to address and coordinate targeted public health actions in a timely manner. To conclude, the results from Nosyck et al.[1] represent the final step in confirming the relationship between optimized OST delivery and ART response in drug-using populations. International efforts are now needed to continue the scale-up of similar models of care and to secure existing models, especially in critical contexts. Acknowledgements Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIDSSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207