An Insight Into Development of Bottom Water Reservoirs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract While water production is an inevitable consequence in bottom water reservoirs, it is usually desirable to defer the onset or the rise of water coning as long as possible. Numerous mechanical and chemical methods have been applied to achieve this goal over recent decades. This paper presents new insights into improving oil production and reducing water production by considering flow barriers below horizontal well trajectories in formation regions with low permeabilities, especially natural ones such as shale bodies. A 3D numerical simulation that applies the Computer Modelling Group's (CMG) STARS Simulator as a cost-effective way to investigate the effects of barriers on horizontal well performance in a bottom water reservoir has been conducted. More specifically, the effects of permeability, dimension, and position of barriers have been comprehensively analyzed when a horizontal well is implemented as a producer. The simulation results have shown that if barriers exist below a horizontal producer, water cut can be postponed and reduced greatly, and cumulative oil production can be increased. Cumulative water production can be decreased dramatically as well. To broaden the applicability of this new insight, some of the possible field implementing technologies, including fractured horizontal wells, small-scale CO2 injection, and solvent injection, are qualitatively simulated to determine their applicability for developing heavy oil in bottom water reservoirs using horizontal wells with the presence of barriers. The simulation results have shown that much better well performance can be reached with the help of barriers when these technologies are integrated systematically. This new strategy shows a rather promising and economic way to develop bottom water reservoirs where the natural driving energy of the aquifer could benefit the oil production process. The results and understanding acquired from this study offer insights into the development of bottom water reservoirs. Introduction Water coning is a critical issue for conventional vertical well production in bottom water reservoirs. Generally speaking, the fluid production process creates a low-pressure region around the wellbore in the reservoir. This differential pressure causes the oilwater interface to deform into a cone shape, at which time the less viscous water phase is produced in preference to the more viscous oil phase. Consequently, the producing Water-Oil Ratio (WOR) increases quickly and readily reaches an uneconomic level. Darcy's law is still the fundamental principle behind this phenomenon. In the past, many researchers have conducted experimental, analytical, and numerical studies on water coning behaviour in vertical wells. Muskat and Wyckoff(1) published one of the early studies related to water coning in 1935. They observed that water coning is a rate-sensitive process and determined the critical oil rate, which is the maximum water-free production rate, by neglecting the shape of the cone. Later on, researchers(2, 3) directed their studies toward the calculation of the critical oil rate. Guo and Lee(4) indicated that the critical rate does not occur at zero wellbore penetration, as may intuitively be expected, but at a wellbore penetration of about one-third of the total oil-zone thickness for an isotropic reservoir.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».