The Selected Works of Margaret Oliphant ed. by Joanne Shattock and Elisabeth Jay (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Selected Works of Margaret Oliphant ed. by Joanne Shattock and Elisabeth Jay Solveig C. Robinson (bio) The Selected Works of Margaret Oliphant, Joanne Shattock and Elisabeth Jay, General Editors (London: Pickering & Chatto). Part I: Literary Criticism and Literary History (2011), 4 vols., pp. 2,080, £350/$625 cloth. Part II: Literary Criticism, Autobiography, Biography and Historical Writing (2012), 5 vols., pp. 2,368, £450/$795 cloth. Newly released in the Pickering Masters series are the first two parts of a planned six-part, twenty-five-volume Selected Works of Margaret Oliphant. Those familiar with Oliphant’s life and work will not be surprised that even in a collection that will eventually run to more than ten thousand pages, only a fraction of her titanic literary output will be reissued. But if the initial volumes are representative of the remainder of the project, VPR readers will want to encourage their libraries to purchase these first two parts and to place standing orders for the remainder, which are scheduled for release from mid-2013 through 2016. (The final volume will include a consolidated index, which in itself promises to be an invaluable aid to Oliphant scholarship.) The project is being overseen by general editors Joanne Shattock and Elisabeth Jay, and individual volumes have been edited by them or by other recognized Oliphant scholars, many of whom are RSVP members. In addition to a comprehensive general introduction, chronology, and selected bibliography for the entire series (published in volume 1), each volume includes a volume-specific introduction and bibliography, introductions to Oliphant’s texts, and remarkably thorough and carefully edited endnotes. Part I samples Oliphant’s literary criticism from its beginnings in 1854 through 1886 and also includes her retrospective, book-length appreciation of the literature of the era, The Victorian Age of English Literature, [End Page 148] originally published in 1892. Part II completes the round-up of Oliphant’s literary criticism through the 1890s and presents a collection of her biographical and historical essays, many of which are long form. All texts in these first parts are reset from the original Victorian periodicals in which they appeared. Readers who have previously come to Oliphant through long hours of poring through dusty and crumbling volumes of Black-wood’s Edinburgh Magazine (or worse, peering painfully at reel after reel of microfilm), with the relevant volume of the Wellesley Index or a bibliography from an Oliphant biography held open with an elbow, will be amazed by how much more enjoyable her prose proves to be when it is served up so conveniently. The condensation of the long extracts characteristic of much Victorian reviewing also usefully streamlines the selected works (endnotes summarize omitted text and provide references to modern editions where available) so that it is possible to simply immerse oneself in the pleasures of Oliphant’s prose. And what an immense and abundantly varied pleasure it is. Over her forty-some-year writing career, Oliphant engaged a very broad range of subjects. In the general introduction, Joanne Shattock explains that “literature,” for Oliphant, as for many of her contemporaries, “signified all subjects of interest to the educated or reasonably well informed reader of her day. . . . Biographies, autobiographies and memoirs, theology, collections of sermons, scientific writing and travel literature—all were grist to her mill” (1:xv). Oliphant’s best known periodical work (and also the largest body of it) was for Blackwood’s, but she also wrote for the Contemporary Review, Cornhill, Edinburgh Review, Spectator, Fraser’s, Longman’s, Macmillan’s, New Quarterly, New Review, St. Paul’s, St. James’s, Atalanta, Good Words, Graphic, and the American children’s magazine, St. Nicholas—as well as some others I have probably missed. The overwhelming number of Oliphant’s publications had a literary focus, mostly consisting of reviews of contemporary British literature but also continental literature and classics. (Representative essays on European literature and culture will be included in Part III of the series.) The second largest number of Oliphant’s essays focus on biography and autobiography, either reviews or biographical studies. However, in the introduction to volume 3, editor Valerie Sanders notes that one of the challenges of selecting pieces and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,058 | 0,059 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».