MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1994929973 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2013.0000

The Selected Works of Margaret Oliphant ed. by Joanne Shattock and Elisabeth Jay (review)

2013· article· en· W1994929973 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Solveig C. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipBiographyHistoryArt historyCriticismClassicsArtLiteratureLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Selected Works of Margaret Oliphant ed. by Joanne Shattock and Elisabeth Jay Solveig C. Robinson (bio) The Selected Works of Margaret Oliphant, Joanne Shattock and Elisabeth Jay, General Editors (London: Pickering & Chatto). Part I: Literary Criticism and Literary History (2011), 4 vols., pp. 2,080, £350/$625 cloth. Part II: Literary Criticism, Autobiography, Biography and Historical Writing (2012), 5 vols., pp. 2,368, £450/$795 cloth. Newly released in the Pickering Masters series are the first two parts of a planned six-part, twenty-five-volume Selected Works of Margaret Oliphant. Those familiar with Oliphant’s life and work will not be surprised that even in a collection that will eventually run to more than ten thousand pages, only a fraction of her titanic literary output will be reissued. But if the initial volumes are representative of the remainder of the project, VPR readers will want to encourage their libraries to purchase these first two parts and to place standing orders for the remainder, which are scheduled for release from mid-2013 through 2016. (The final volume will include a consolidated index, which in itself promises to be an invaluable aid to Oliphant scholarship.) The project is being overseen by general editors Joanne Shattock and Elisabeth Jay, and individual volumes have been edited by them or by other recognized Oliphant scholars, many of whom are RSVP members. In addition to a comprehensive general introduction, chronology, and selected bibliography for the entire series (published in volume 1), each volume includes a volume-specific introduction and bibliography, introductions to Oliphant’s texts, and remarkably thorough and carefully edited endnotes. Part I samples Oliphant’s literary criticism from its beginnings in 1854 through 1886 and also includes her retrospective, book-length appreciation of the literature of the era, The Victorian Age of English Literature, [End Page 148] originally published in 1892. Part II completes the round-up of Oliphant’s literary criticism through the 1890s and presents a collection of her biographical and historical essays, many of which are long form. All texts in these first parts are reset from the original Victorian periodicals in which they appeared. Readers who have previously come to Oliphant through long hours of poring through dusty and crumbling volumes of Black-wood’s Edinburgh Magazine (or worse, peering painfully at reel after reel of microfilm), with the relevant volume of the Wellesley Index or a bibliography from an Oliphant biography held open with an elbow, will be amazed by how much more enjoyable her prose proves to be when it is served up so conveniently. The condensation of the long extracts characteristic of much Victorian reviewing also usefully streamlines the selected works (endnotes summarize omitted text and provide references to modern editions where available) so that it is possible to simply immerse oneself in the pleasures of Oliphant’s prose. And what an immense and abundantly varied pleasure it is. Over her forty-some-year writing career, Oliphant engaged a very broad range of subjects. In the general introduction, Joanne Shattock explains that “literature,” for Oliphant, as for many of her contemporaries, “signified all subjects of interest to the educated or reasonably well informed reader of her day. . . . Biographies, autobiographies and memoirs, theology, collections of sermons, scientific writing and travel literature—all were grist to her mill” (1:xv). Oliphant’s best known periodical work (and also the largest body of it) was for Blackwood’s, but she also wrote for the Contemporary Review, Cornhill, Edinburgh Review, Spectator, Fraser’s, Longman’s, Macmillan’s, New Quarterly, New Review, St. Paul’s, St. James’s, Atalanta, Good Words, Graphic, and the American children’s magazine, St. Nicholas—as well as some others I have probably missed. The overwhelming number of Oliphant’s publications had a literary focus, mostly consisting of reviews of contemporary British literature but also continental literature and classics. (Representative essays on European literature and culture will be included in Part III of the series.) The second largest number of Oliphant’s essays focus on biography and autobiography, either reviews or biographical studies. However, in the introduction to volume 3, editor Valerie Sanders notes that one of the challenges of selecting pieces and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207