MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1995769537 · doi:10.1097/01.wno.0000189064.20552.c1

Carotid Endarterectomy for Ophthalmic Manifestations: What Do We Do?

2005· article· en· W1995769537 sur OpenAlexaffabout
David A. Nicolle, Vladimir Hachinski

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCarotid endarterectomyStenosisRadiologyStroke (engine)WarfarinAspirinCardiologyInternal medicineAtrial fibrillation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In the use of carotid endarterectomy (CE), the Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences in London, Ontario, follows the guidelines derived from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (1), which was organized at our institution. In our hospital, three surgeons perform between 100 and 110 CEs and between 10 and 20 cervical carotid stents each year. Most patients are referred from the southwestern Ontario region. Our complication rate for CE is 1% for death and 1% for major stroke. This is how we currently manage patients with the four major ophthalmic indications for CE: 1) Transient monocular visual loss (TMVL): These patients undergo carotid Doppler ultrasound and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). TEE is preferred over transthoracic echocardiography because TEE allows a better look not only at the left atrium, but also the ascending aorta, which is often an unrecognized source of emboli. If the carotid ultrasound shows hemodynamically significant stenosis, the next step would be cerebral angiography. More recently, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) have been used with increasing frequency. The reason for this shift is that MRA and CTA are less dangerous because they do not involve catheterization and are also cheaper and quicker. If the echocardiogram test shows a plausible source of emboli, the patient would be anticoagulated with warfarin. Eighty-one milligrams of aspirin per day may be added if atherosclerotic carotid arteries were also found, although this increases the risk of bleeding and must be individualized. If the internal carotid artery shows more than 70% stenosis, CE is offered to the patient. If a cardiac or aortic source has been found by echocardiography and the patient has been anticoagulated, the anticoagulation would be stopped to do the CE and then started up again after the surgery. Carotid stenting may be offered if there are significant medical problems precluding CE. If there is 50%-70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery, CE is performed only in men who have also suffered one or more hemispheric transient ischemic attacks, particularly if the transient ocular ischemic attack has occurred within 48 hours. In the 50%-70% stenosis group, less benefit has been shown for women, and surgery is seldom recommended. If there is less than 50% internal carotid artery stenosis, we do not perform CE. 2) Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO): This condition is also initially evaluated with carotid ultrasound and TEE, as well as a sedimentation rate (to exclude temporal arteritis). Management guidelines for CE are the same as for TMVL. 3) Asymptomatic Hollenhorst plaque (cholesterol retinal emboli): CE is not performed, irrespective of the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis. Such patients undergo TEE to exclude a cardiac or aortic source of emboli and a carotid ultrasound if the TEE is negative. We do not operate on these asymptomatic patients because the stroke rate is very low and there is no difference between medical treatment and CE. 4) Ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS): Patients with OIS typically have severe internal carotid artery stenosis or complete occlusion. Those with more than 70% stenosis are offered CE because it may help in stopping the progression of the ocular ischemia. CE is not offered for total carotid artery occlusion because the success rate of opening the artery in an occlusion is low and there is a high complication rate of stroke. Acknowledgment The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. Don Lee and Dr. Gary Ferguson.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,761
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,312
Écart entre enseignants0,286 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2005
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologyMême sujetCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesTravaux en français237 207