MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Carotid Endarterectomy for Ophthalmic Manifestations: What Do We Do?

2005· article· en· W1995769537 on OpenAlexaffabout
David A. Nicolle, Vladimir Hachinski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCarotid endarterectomyStenosisRadiologyStroke (engine)WarfarinAspirinCardiologyInternal medicineAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the use of carotid endarterectomy (CE), the Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences in London, Ontario, follows the guidelines derived from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (1), which was organized at our institution. In our hospital, three surgeons perform between 100 and 110 CEs and between 10 and 20 cervical carotid stents each year. Most patients are referred from the southwestern Ontario region. Our complication rate for CE is 1% for death and 1% for major stroke. This is how we currently manage patients with the four major ophthalmic indications for CE: 1) Transient monocular visual loss (TMVL): These patients undergo carotid Doppler ultrasound and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). TEE is preferred over transthoracic echocardiography because TEE allows a better look not only at the left atrium, but also the ascending aorta, which is often an unrecognized source of emboli. If the carotid ultrasound shows hemodynamically significant stenosis, the next step would be cerebral angiography. More recently, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) have been used with increasing frequency. The reason for this shift is that MRA and CTA are less dangerous because they do not involve catheterization and are also cheaper and quicker. If the echocardiogram test shows a plausible source of emboli, the patient would be anticoagulated with warfarin. Eighty-one milligrams of aspirin per day may be added if atherosclerotic carotid arteries were also found, although this increases the risk of bleeding and must be individualized. If the internal carotid artery shows more than 70% stenosis, CE is offered to the patient. If a cardiac or aortic source has been found by echocardiography and the patient has been anticoagulated, the anticoagulation would be stopped to do the CE and then started up again after the surgery. Carotid stenting may be offered if there are significant medical problems precluding CE. If there is 50%-70% stenosis of the internal carotid artery, CE is performed only in men who have also suffered one or more hemispheric transient ischemic attacks, particularly if the transient ocular ischemic attack has occurred within 48 hours. In the 50%-70% stenosis group, less benefit has been shown for women, and surgery is seldom recommended. If there is less than 50% internal carotid artery stenosis, we do not perform CE. 2) Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO): This condition is also initially evaluated with carotid ultrasound and TEE, as well as a sedimentation rate (to exclude temporal arteritis). Management guidelines for CE are the same as for TMVL. 3) Asymptomatic Hollenhorst plaque (cholesterol retinal emboli): CE is not performed, irrespective of the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis. Such patients undergo TEE to exclude a cardiac or aortic source of emboli and a carotid ultrasound if the TEE is negative. We do not operate on these asymptomatic patients because the stroke rate is very low and there is no difference between medical treatment and CE. 4) Ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS): Patients with OIS typically have severe internal carotid artery stenosis or complete occlusion. Those with more than 70% stenosis are offered CE because it may help in stopping the progression of the ocular ischemia. CE is not offered for total carotid artery occlusion because the success rate of opening the artery in an occlusion is low and there is a high complication rate of stroke. Acknowledgment The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr. Don Lee and Dr. Gary Ferguson.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207