Evaluation of the Pediatric Patient for Liver Transplantation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PREAMBLE Current American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) liver transplant evaluation guidelines include both adult and pediatric patients (1). While pediatric liver transplants account for ∼7.8% of all liver transplants in the United States, sufficient differences between pediatric and adult patients seeking liver transplantation (LT) now require independent, yet complementary documents. This document will focus on pediatric issues at each level of the evaluation process. Disease categories suitable for referral to a pediatric LT program are similar to adults: acute liver failure (ALF), autoimmune, cholestasis, metabolic or genetic, oncologic, vascular, and infectious; however, specific etiologies and outcomes differ widely from adult patients, justifying independent pediatric guidelines. Data supporting our recommendations are based on a MEDLINE search of the English language literature from 1997 to the present. Intended for use by physicians, these recommendations suggest preferred approaches to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of care. They are intended to be flexible, in contrast to standards of care, which are inflexible policies to be followed in every case. Specific recommendations are based on relevant published information. To more fully characterize the available evidence supporting the recommendations, the AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee has adopted the classification used by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) workgroup with minor modifications (Table 1). The classifications and recommendations are based on 3 categories: the source of evidence in levels I through III; the quality of evidence designated by high (A), moderate (B), or low quality (C); and the strength of recommendations classified as strong or weak.TABLE 1: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)LITERATURE REVIEW METHODS AND ANALYSIS Each association appointed at least 1 author to serve on the writing group. The chair of the writing group was appointed by the AASLD. Members of the writing group were not compensated for their work and served as volunteers throughout the process from concept design through final publication. Writing group members had no financial conflict of interest or financial relationship with commercial entities relevant to the article. Topics relevant to liver transplant evaluation in the pediatric patients were identified through a conference call with all members of the writing group on July 11, 2012 and assignments were distributed among the members based on their particular expertise and interest. The literature databases and the search strategies are outlined below. The resulting literature database was available to all members of the writing group. They selected references within their field of expertise and experience and graded the references according to the GRADE system. Data supporting our recommendations are based on a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature from 1973 to the present. Primary search terms included: liver transplant evaluation, liver transplant, child, pediatric, and liver transplant outcome. In addition, each assessment (eg, anesthesia, hepatology, renal); diagnosis (eg, biliary atresia, organic acidemia, maple syrup urine disease [MSUD], ductal plate malformation) and complication (eg, hepatopulmonary syndrome [HPS], malignancy) was searched in the context of the primary search terms as well as individually when relevant clinical background information was needed. The selection of references for the guideline was based on a validation of the appropriateness of the study design for the stated purpose, a relevant number of patients under study, and confidence in the participating centers and authors. References on original data were preferred and those that were found unsatisfactory in any of these respects were excluded from further evaluation. There may be limitations in this approach when recommendations are needed on rare problems or problems on which scant original data are available. In such cases it may be necessary to rely on less qualified references with a low grading. PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANT EVALUATION TEAM Children have distinct diseases, clinical susceptibilities, physiological responses, as well as neurocognitive and neurodevelopmental features that distinguish them from adults. In fact, even within the pediatric age group differences can be found between newborns, infants, children, and adolescents. Given the intraabdominal anatomical variations associated with biliary atresia, the most common indication for pediatric LT, as well as the restricted abdominal cavity and small size of blood vessels in infants and young children, surgical teams with exhaustive pediatric experience will benefit the pediatric recipient of an LT. Members of the pediatric LT team (Table 2) use their expertise to tailor the LT evaluation plan (Table 3) to the unique needs of the child. The end product of the evaluation will ensure the elements for an informed decision to proceed to LT are met (2).TABLE 2: Potential members of the pediatric liver transplant teamTABLE 3: Components of the pediatric liver transplantation evaluationRecommendation: A multidisciplinary pediatric LT evaluation team should be skilled in pediatric conditions and properly communicate with the family and the child, when appropriate, the processes, risks, and benefits associated with LT. (2-B) TIMING OF REFERRAL FOR PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANT EVALUATION Based on the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OTPN) from January 1, 2011 through May 31, 2013, indications for LT include biliary atresia (32%), metabolic/genetic conditions (22%), acute liver failure (11%), cirrhosis (9%), liver tumor (9%), immune-mediated liver and biliary injury (4%), and other miscellaneous conditions (13%) (Fig. 1). Within these broad categories rest many rare conditions with myriad presentations.FIGURE 1: Indications for pediatric liver transplant.Because timing for referral varies depending on the child's clinical circumstances, referral for LT may be emergent, urgent, or anticipatory. ALF or an acute decompensation of an established liver disease may have a rapid and unpredictable course progressing to death or irreversible neurological damage (3). Children with metabolic liver such as or can experience neurological as a of metabolic Primary and liver are rare in children, with and the most for with on to and surgical for an or a for of with biliary atresia to with their liver the 3 to for those with a with syndrome and 1, and can the child's quality of liver associated with liver disease at for with a pediatric LT should be for with ALF or acute decompensation of an established liver referral for LT evaluation may be Children with metabolic to surgical or evidence of should be for LT evaluation. atresia patients are should be for LT evaluation the 3 from liver transplant evaluation should be in patients between and for LT evaluation should be for with liver disease and evidence of liver by or of LIVER TRANSPLANT EVALUATION and The child's evaluation as it to primary associated and strategies should be and by the primary pediatric for of the child's liver should include clinical of and and surgical and as well as and of the between a of the LT evaluation team and the child's will and that may not be in the or may be identified the LT evaluation A of the by the LT team the LT evaluation will the evaluation and of the primary assessment of and to LT. (2-B) In with the primary pediatric of the primary disease and should be and (2-B) associated with liver disease include and and In patients with of a of and an for to as as 1 of intraabdominal more for it to be on to to are not and of the may to that between the abdominal and the of the liver suggest sufficient to can be used to to and a should be used with can patients with with or an can and to can and the for and to a quality of and are the child's and not to of should for of the or or Evaluation and of in varies widely among In the of data supporting primary for in children, for has not disease a of with primary LT, patients with and disease are at for of their primary liver disease those with may be at for can be with an more of or or surgical should be for that or quality of (2-B) with conditions such as and disease should be informed that liver disease can (2-B) at for such as should be informed of the for for evidence of for (2-B) Children with liver disease are at for require to more to from a with in of LT and as well as neurodevelopmental and are the most to on may in with liver disease common and and recommendations to are available that are preferred in patients, of can to should not be restricted in the of not of in with liver disease may and in with of a liver transplant are with have similar as had and are more to experience syndrome in adult liver transplant the in pediatric not assessment should include and of to and and in infants, use of with (2-B) for LT should be to outcomes and may be needed in (2-B) disease can be in with and by and a high of in adults. of as by can be found in with cirrhosis as well as those with associated with disease or In study, of with had evidence of While those with a and were no differences in the between those LT those to LT. and both in more are conditions that as a of of the of the liver disease clinical include and for by of when in the or on should be for further evaluation with of with the of in the within 3 to A can be used to and the of a of was specific for associated with for are While the and may a and both may be In addition, with may in which should be by to other of such as and high by a with for LT a unique In to at for of and the of disease can outcome. The in 1 and have used in a to was found to be in patients with liver disease LT those not LT and used to LT with the in the should be in all patients with (2-B) with should be in all patients at the of liver transplant evaluation the by a necessary to the diagnosis of (2-B) and should be in patients with for liver (2-B) the most of of an such as in the clinical are available to at such as are by the of of such as are by and as well as and an of the can be most used to for evidence of be used to The the and a to an and used at the The a that by the not or by the and not by or for are high in infants approach adult levels by 1 of age A level of a with a and of and in a pediatric of with a age of that both and patients with acute the pediatric for to the of the of and a of the by the and urine to the of injury that liver and transplant less common in among with liver disease can be with biliary atresia to have and liver transplant those with may have a of disease can be associated with primary and LT can be LT, in with of and to by may be to associated in the should be in all patients, with on those with metabolic liver associated with and those at for (2-B) should not be used to (2-B) or the should be used to the in with liver The be used to the of acute (2-B) by and in with liver disease A of transplant centers in the United that a transplantation in or of LT of and from a source of strategies are in this Children with liver disease should a for evidence of or referral to a pediatric should are (2-B) assessment should include of and of and that may include and and biliary atresia with and primary and A LT team has associated with more outcomes in pediatric centers were excluded from this study The United Network for Organ has to require liver transplant to a of Liver has expertise in the of of liver transplant patients and can serve as an to other members of the with pediatric indications for LT and associated should ensure the LT evaluation to and (2-B) and of Children with liver disease are not fully in of LT Development of a disease or LT will and and the of injury or of in the LT are more the of liver disease and more LT. to and in with to disease can in with liver disease when are low There a of data to in patients with liver disease decompensation has with and in with cirrhosis the of decompensation with those not the Guidelines for of liver transplant and are published by the American of Transplantation guidelines for of the were published by the Diseases of of to the has in of Data suggest that of to other to the disease and are associated with and in LT. Children are at for these conditions are to and and a liver from a LT for at for LT strategies to and disease include assessment of and in the recipient and have LT outcomes of all for the and family should transplantation and the of liver disease have not the necessary can on an should be for patients and their family and to family members of infants less members of for LT should be fully both and the should be of a and as by should be on all for liver transplant, that for less to of may have to the from the LT and unique to with a with a of of and by the primary can have a on disease and family are identified and of of the child's and are to the of of may be necessary the to disease the child's to for include a of to or and assessment for pediatric LT can such as by the or family family and of financial benefit from to should be to ensure and are for to and at for should be identified and and Members of the transplant in with the child's primary may to serve as the child's in in which are to the that the child's transplant in or a high of and have in LT and specific in and language LT in and and low levels with and transplantation The association of at transplantation was to with neurocognitive outcomes LT Children with biliary atresia in and language with patients more and language within the for age at with language The of a or has of for LT. with a and for for or to or and assessment of quality of data to these are of a from of pediatric transplant a among centers the of neurodevelopmental in the decision to for transplantation transplantation with a of was in a selected of pediatric transplant should be in LT to to and should be to neurocognitive and for and Liver Transplantation The of pediatric LT were with the of liver transplantation surgical for both the and recipient the was to for liver transplantation in rare liver of the of be in with (eg, when the may be an and not a common To LT be the or LT not an or a has not available. for the to be appropriate, the the recipient will should be the to the and the well informed of the to or and on the from both and to the of a or should be throughout the evaluation process to ensure the will to proceed with liver and have the to or from at any of for a with acute liver failure has that the clinical be to a and informed to evaluation of have found and outcomes of the for the patients with acute liver failure had to LT, and to a group that a In to the evaluation to surgical risks, of the to be and evidence of a the will require that include assessment and the recipient has an metabolic the of a to serve as an should be in the context of the child's has for conditions such as syndrome 1 disease 1 and In patients with recipient outcomes or failure to small to use are the has Children an for may require of physiological or to in can be in many conditions necessary to the of for these rare conditions and to to the (2-B) A family may be for in evaluation include assessment to that may include liver the and recipient the 1 or the should be for and not in most (2-B) FOR LIVER and the most common of liver disease to LT in of and of a by to of age for with with and to have outcomes to of patients with may have the within 3 the Children with biliary atresia may have less of as in not include cholestasis, with or to in patients with are not with or of and within of was not to at it to of age to ensure and of can neurodevelopmental and transplant of in children, and use of for primary of in may be the that LT evaluation. cases of in patients with have patients of the of in low LT for patients with of liver disease with or associated decompensation of liver can be an indication for LT in least of patients with transplants by of with the the at of age are used in with In the United States, the and for liver transplant in and the preferred for biliary atresia liver transplant evaluation should be in infants with evidence of liver disease (2-B) LT needed to outcomes in with patients should be for LT evaluation the 3 from liver transplant evaluation should be in patients with between and and for those with have of biliary cirrhosis or within of not an that may the and and or with and Liver from liver to biliary and with and may experience liver disease with or evidence of clinical liver disease in to of patients with will require LT and are in of cholestasis, failure to and have for LT however, biliary biliary and have and quality of in associated with the of in which may in are of by LT, may not be by LT. The for in to the of LT of the abdominal and There no on the and for in the of surgical under those however, of a of the abdominal or should be LT resulting from have a on the of LT, with disease the most to a on and blood with have established with associated with may the of and may be to the and of a with can those patients can their by the necessary for LT between and at 1 and at and at between and all other pediatric liver transplant were to be similar in a experience A of the database and was for patients, and for among patients neurological and disease associated with will require a to the of LT with should be for evidence of of this liver transplant should be to include for such as and with biliary or to LT should be to the assessment of and should LT evaluation in all liver transplant (2-B) of the intraabdominal should be of the and may be Disease a liver with myriad may be from liver or cirrhosis The most when present. A of age with ALF by a and low or should the for with an acute a clinical and with outcomes are The AASLD adult and pediatric guidelines that include recommendations for liver transplant evaluation Liver acute liver failure a that from with ALF in of and outcomes to established for the study serve to require and include of a liver that not to between and with clinical evidence of or and of the of clinical Children with may experience rapid clinical to irreversible injury or death differ among infants, children, and with that are such as liver disease acute and clinical can and at a pediatric liver transplant a pediatric with expertise in liver an and a liver transplant with other will outcome. among and between age and disease however, with an diagnosis are more to a liver transplant to proceed to liver transplant in are by in outcome. disease in the of death for an the that may have LT the of or clinical to irreversible to LT in include those associated with and irreversible with Children with resulting from are for transplant which include or transplantation patients should with referral to a pediatric liver transplant for multidisciplinary care. an of to conditions that are LT or for LT. The for followed by of all tumor The for that with for can be identified to of primary LT for have an those an LT for of and have a The of used to the of disease at the of diagnosis and patients for referral to a program with experience in both pediatric and LT. with disease all of the disease or of or a have outcomes with and surgical A from a with in and patients with with at the of diagnosis have LT that similar to those at the of diagnosis of the are no by or are and are identified In the of to that surgical of the liver tumor with and sufficient with LT has to have outcomes Children with and should be for LT evaluation at the of diagnosis or no of with and can be for LT of a tumor the the are of the associated with and metabolic disease cholestasis, biliary atresia, and liver disease The of may be for with from to age 3 the of identified in the for children, as to of cases are found in a liver rare and and at the of diagnosis for are not with surgical may be more in in when LT was restricted to met the a tumor no more 3 with each not 3 and of or The may not be in children, however, and recommendations be LT outcomes have even for those not the more of tumor or of 3 with and tumor size or the of number of the size of the or LT outcomes have in with with blood or referral to a liver transplant should for with or to have (2-B) the may not be to children, transplantation for be and should be in the of evidence of disease or of size of the or number of to transplant include evidence of disease to transplant include or rapid disease (2-B) among and are no data to for in with disease and are at for and should (2-B) the most common pediatric has 3 categories: and and most are and however, with high failure and can to a in the of and which may distinguish them from the liver by and include to an abdominal abdominal and to of 3 which to not to and most require surgical or to and have for include and and Liver transplant evaluation for the not to or associated with for LT for a should be for (2-B) Liver Disease Liver disease in to of patients with to of patients have cirrhosis on the of liver disease not liver disease by and and not to in the of other of liver may not be a sufficient indication for LT in patients with may be timing for LT assessment of and in for liver disease liver disease are for those patients with are of for liver disease are for those transplantation for other with those patients on the pediatric and adult transplant with a benefit A of the database and similar and data among patients with LT may and patients with may be at for the of and The indications for LT in are by the of failure and the of of timing for assessment of and and in patients with (2-B) are of by in the 1, and to The of their clinical can be similar to and death can a diagnosis of in an the other are in an at any most infants within to with a with and and progressing to and death which account for the neurological outcomes associated with are by or The of the (eg, 1, are in the (eg, have of clinical LT as an and to be for of a and of LT should be in patients with irreversible neurological damage can patients with neurological disease or LT may will not neurological outcome. of the has the of timing of the referral for LT should be when patients in the of with to or irreversible neurological damage may be an for I syndrome I from of the the by of and of to can and it to for to and a of to to an LT the for LT evaluation should be for patients with the of at the of diagnosis when the of LT can be Liver Disease a liver by high levels of and the of with a more course in 1, by more common by a more associated with liver failure In a study of with clinical and evidence of of had with in a with and with or for both and may be for those with LT in to of with a of in the outcomes are similar to the in terms of or metabolic The of for those LT for this not in or the for which from patients transplants for may be at of LT adult patients The of of to be to however, for LT in patients with with ALF associated with and those of liver disease not with (2-B) Children with and for LT should be informed may require more for other indications and at for of (2-B) Primary by and of the biliary to and cirrhosis Children with biliary features with can have biliary disease or have may or to and features of 1 the used to the biliary features in with a primary diagnosis of and it more common in There in and in have similar or In of the which conditions in the the that patients should be by the (eg, and those with features should not be to have a unique diagnosis primary and and have similar to LT the for liver disease resulting from a with and biliary that not associated with with of in to with a similar clinical and and to that in with are at the of with and disease LT in and of children, and LT in in rare and not all cases are associated with associated with in are not well in may be more among with disease and for of pediatric patients for LT and pediatric transplants LT for liver disease by and are to those of transplantation for other indications include biliary and disease in the with and have a with those with The LT for for with a with both and LT in patients with features of (2-B) LT evaluation should be for patients with liver for the of (2-B) or to a group of The for these conditions as the and are based on clinical liver and as well as on specific other of 1 from a in the and a that may the and of disease
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».