HISTORY AND ROLE OF INFORMATION SECURITY IN POSTAGE EVIDENCING AND PAYMENT
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACTStep-by-step, information security technology has enabled the transition of postage evidencing and payment security from reliance on people, manual processes and paper records to reliance on automated procedures, trusted remote data systems and cryptographic protocols. This evolution improved both the security and the convenience of postage evidencing and payment through postage metering and thus enabled effective access to postal products. Reset, the process of adding postage to the meter, changed from a visit to a post office and manual record keeping to communication with a data center to receive an authentication code with a subsequent automatic completion of the transaction. Verification of the authenticity of printed indicia changed from a forensic analysis to automatic cryptographic authentication. Finally, with the introduction of NIST standard FIPS 140–1 level 4 physical security requirements, manual inspection of meters that are compliant with this standard by postal officials is being replaced by online verification of their physical integrity and procedural accuracy. These improvements in their totality enabled a remarkable transition of one of the most traditional office devices from the analog to the digital age.KEYWORDS: Postage meteringUSPSe-commerceDESelliptic curveRSAFIPS 140 Additional informationNotes on contributorsRobert Corderythe Secure Systems Group in Advanced Concepts and Technology at Pitney Bowes. He has played a key role in the evolution of cryptographically secured postage evidencing. Robert's research interests include applications of cryptography, formal methods analysis of cryptographic protocols, authentication of printed images, watermarking printed documents and modeling ink-paper interactions. He holds a PhD in theoretical statistical physics from the University of Toronto.Leon PintsovInternational Standards Advanced Technology, is an internationally recognized authority in the field of payment security and information security. He is also recognized as an expert in the field of computer imaging and optical Character Recognition. He authored and co-authored a book on computer modeling of imaging devices and publications in the fields of computer imaging, cryptographic applications and transaction cost economics.In 1985 Leon was elected to the rank of a Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Leon is a member of American National Standards Institute accredited committee X9.F1 on financial Security and European Standardisation Committee (CEN) TC331 committee on postal standards where he chairs several sub-committees. He is also a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Center for Applied Cryptographic Research at the University of Waterloo (Canada), a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of ONETS Corp (China), member of the Board of Directors of Connecticut Technology Council and MIT Forum of Connecticut (USA) and Advisory Board of Axiom Venture Partners in Hartford, Connecticut (USA).University of St. Petersburg (Russia), Executive MS degree in Management Science from the Hartford Graduate Center of the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and PhD degree in Applied Mathematics from the Institute of Telecommunication Engineering in St. Petersburg.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle