MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1998979618 · doi:10.1353/cjm.2008.0045

‘Bring Furth the Pagants.’ Essays in Early English Drama Presented to Alexandra F. Johnston ed. by David N. Klausner, Karen Sawyer Marsalek (review)

2008· article· en· W1998979618 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Teo

Notice bibliographique

RevueComitatus · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDramaHonorHistoryArt historyArtLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEWS 240 ‘Bring Furth the Pagants.’ Essays in Early English Drama Presented to Alexandra F. Johnston, ed. David N. Klausner and Karen Sawyer Marsalek (Toronto: University of Toronto Press 2007) 329 pp. As a voluminous collection of critical essays produced by illustrious scholars in honor of a well-known or retired scholar in academia, festschrift collections are often ambitious and of varying degrees of success in terms of the materials they assemble. This volume, ‘Bring Furth the Pagants.’ Essays in Early English Drama Presented to Alexandra F. Johnston, dedicates itself to the memory of Alexandra Ferguson Johnston, who pioneered the founding of the REED (Records of Early English Drama) project with Margaret Rogerson in 1975. While critical devotion to the material and socio-cultural conditions underlying the production and consumption of English drama in specific locales like London, York, and various shires forms a large bulk of this collection’s focus, thematic studies in theological and aesthetic themes are important groundbreaking contributions to the field of drama too. Being itself a form of compilatio, the REED project amasses the immense resources provided not only by scholars based at the University of Toronto, but also across Canada, the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, and also, archival materials pertaining to the performance of drama, minstrelsy, and pubic ceremonial culture in England before the Puritan closure of the London theaters in 1642. The volume does well to single out specific material aspects of dramatic performance pre-1642, such as local patronage records outside of London and socio-legislative and political conditions conducive or anathema to the performance of public drama and pageantry. A case-in-point is Sally-Beth Maclean’s essay, “The Southwest Entertains: Exeter and Local Performance Patronage,” in which Maclean argues for the existence of a performance landscape in the locale of Exeter as asserted by patron families who created a demand for such performances at home during the period between 1362 and 1485, the year of Henry VII’s seizure of the throne. She uses guildhall records, including roll calls, to determine the identities of the prominent aristocratic families in late medieval Devon—including the Beaumonts of Combe and Heanton, the Bonvilles of Shute, the Bourchiers of Tawstock, the Carews of Haccombe and Mohun’s Ottery, the Courtenays of Tiverton—and plots the rise and decline of these families using available architectural evidence to attempt reproducing the performance conditions in fifteenth-century Exeter. Similarly, Peter Meredith’s essay, “‘Young Men Will Do It’: Fun, Disorder, and Good Government in York, 1555; Some Thoughts on House Book 21,” uses House Book 21 of the York City Archives—which includes materials like expenditure records as stipulated by the city mayor for entertainment during that year, and records of riotous occurrences such as summer games involving characters like the Luty brothers and William Hosyar—to recreate a possible landscape replete with characters who either awaited entertainment from the performing troupes or provided a possible anti-culture, frustrating the performances. Another important aspect of critical study in the festschrift pertains to the significance of editorial and paleographical methods in approaching early English drama itself. Meg Twycross’s essay, “The Ordo Paginarum Revisited, With a Digital Camera,” studies the Ordo Paginarum (Order of Pageants), a record of the pageants of the York Corpus Christi plays as kept by the York REVIEWS 241 civic authorities in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries and compiled for the A/Y Memorandum Book for the facts that it can tell us about the particular plays performed during the time of the register’s compilation. The purported use of editorial and paleographical methods in approaching the manuscript of the Order of Pageants is not without its flaws, since Twycross draws our attention to the manuscript’s nature as a palimpsest, with details updated and erased when the contents of the pageants changed. Nevertheless, as an aside to her own observations, the incorporation of digital photography technology has supplemented her research work in REED by allowing a possible “virtual restoration” (Twycross 113) of the manuscript instead of facsimile scans. The volume also explores the question of the vital relationship between faith, authority, and drama in late medieval and Renaissance...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,206
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,887

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueComitatusMême sujetReformation and Early Modern ChristianityTravaux en français237 207