MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998979618 · doi:10.1353/cjm.2008.0045

‘Bring Furth the Pagants.’ Essays in Early English Drama Presented to Alexandra F. Johnston ed. by David N. Klausner, Karen Sawyer Marsalek (review)

2008· article· en· W1998979618 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin Teo

Bibliographic record

VenueComitatus · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaHonorHistoryArt historyArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

REVIEWS 240 ‘Bring Furth the Pagants.’ Essays in Early English Drama Presented to Alexandra F. Johnston, ed. David N. Klausner and Karen Sawyer Marsalek (Toronto: University of Toronto Press 2007) 329 pp. As a voluminous collection of critical essays produced by illustrious scholars in honor of a well-known or retired scholar in academia, festschrift collections are often ambitious and of varying degrees of success in terms of the materials they assemble. This volume, ‘Bring Furth the Pagants.’ Essays in Early English Drama Presented to Alexandra F. Johnston, dedicates itself to the memory of Alexandra Ferguson Johnston, who pioneered the founding of the REED (Records of Early English Drama) project with Margaret Rogerson in 1975. While critical devotion to the material and socio-cultural conditions underlying the production and consumption of English drama in specific locales like London, York, and various shires forms a large bulk of this collection’s focus, thematic studies in theological and aesthetic themes are important groundbreaking contributions to the field of drama too. Being itself a form of compilatio, the REED project amasses the immense resources provided not only by scholars based at the University of Toronto, but also across Canada, the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom, and also, archival materials pertaining to the performance of drama, minstrelsy, and pubic ceremonial culture in England before the Puritan closure of the London theaters in 1642. The volume does well to single out specific material aspects of dramatic performance pre-1642, such as local patronage records outside of London and socio-legislative and political conditions conducive or anathema to the performance of public drama and pageantry. A case-in-point is Sally-Beth Maclean’s essay, “The Southwest Entertains: Exeter and Local Performance Patronage,” in which Maclean argues for the existence of a performance landscape in the locale of Exeter as asserted by patron families who created a demand for such performances at home during the period between 1362 and 1485, the year of Henry VII’s seizure of the throne. She uses guildhall records, including roll calls, to determine the identities of the prominent aristocratic families in late medieval Devon—including the Beaumonts of Combe and Heanton, the Bonvilles of Shute, the Bourchiers of Tawstock, the Carews of Haccombe and Mohun’s Ottery, the Courtenays of Tiverton—and plots the rise and decline of these families using available architectural evidence to attempt reproducing the performance conditions in fifteenth-century Exeter. Similarly, Peter Meredith’s essay, “‘Young Men Will Do It’: Fun, Disorder, and Good Government in York, 1555; Some Thoughts on House Book 21,” uses House Book 21 of the York City Archives—which includes materials like expenditure records as stipulated by the city mayor for entertainment during that year, and records of riotous occurrences such as summer games involving characters like the Luty brothers and William Hosyar—to recreate a possible landscape replete with characters who either awaited entertainment from the performing troupes or provided a possible anti-culture, frustrating the performances. Another important aspect of critical study in the festschrift pertains to the significance of editorial and paleographical methods in approaching early English drama itself. Meg Twycross’s essay, “The Ordo Paginarum Revisited, With a Digital Camera,” studies the Ordo Paginarum (Order of Pageants), a record of the pageants of the York Corpus Christi plays as kept by the York REVIEWS 241 civic authorities in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries and compiled for the A/Y Memorandum Book for the facts that it can tell us about the particular plays performed during the time of the register’s compilation. The purported use of editorial and paleographical methods in approaching the manuscript of the Order of Pageants is not without its flaws, since Twycross draws our attention to the manuscript’s nature as a palimpsest, with details updated and erased when the contents of the pageants changed. Nevertheless, as an aside to her own observations, the incorporation of digital photography technology has supplemented her research work in REED by allowing a possible “virtual restoration” (Twycross 113) of the manuscript instead of facsimile scans. The volume also explores the question of the vital relationship between faith, authority, and drama in late medieval and Renaissance...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComitatusSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207