MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999009082 · doi:10.1681/asn.2010010072

Of Mice and Men

2010· letter· en· W1999009082 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
York Pei

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2010
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clésPKD1Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseasePolycystic kidney diseaseCiliumKidneyBiologyKidney diseaseDiseaseKidney developmentPathogenesisPositional cloningMedicineCell biologyInternal medicineBioinformaticsGeneticsEndocrinologyLocus (genetics)Gene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common monogenic kidney disease and accounts for approximately 5% of ESRD in developed countries. Focal development of renal cysts, which increase in number and size with age, leads to distortion of the normal kidney architecture and ultimately ESRD in a majority of patients by the fifth decade of life. Currently, clinical management of ADPKD is limited to nonspecific measures such as BP control, dialysis, and transplantation. Most cases of ADPKD are due to mutations of two genes: PKD1 and PKD2. Positional cloning of PKD1 in 1995 and PKD2 in 1996 represented a major research landmark and provided researchers essential genomic reagents for elucidating the molecular pathogenesis of ADPKD.1,2 In the past 15 years, we have witnessed important advances in our fundamental understanding of ADPKD. For example, we have learned that polycystin-1 and -2, the proteins encoded by PKD1 and PKD2, respectively, are components of a novel multifunctional signaling pathway that regulates growth, differentiation, and maintenance of three-dimensional spatial orientation of tubular epithelial cells3; that complete loss or significant reduction of polycystin levels beyond a critical threshold within tubular epithelial cells triggers clonal formation of individual cysts4,5; that the polycystin-1/2 complex at the primary cilium serves as a mechanosensor of urine flow to modulate calcium influx and intracellular signaling3,6; and that perturbation of multiple signaling pathways modifies growth of renal cysts.7,8 The next decade holds the exciting possibility that some of these novel insights may be translated into mechanism-based drug treatments that target renal cyst growth and thereby delay or prevent ESRD. Indeed, a recent review highlighted at least six classes of drugs with distinct mechanisms to modulate intracellular calcium, cAMP, CFTR chloride channels, MAPK-ERK, mTOR signaling, or cell cycle that may have therapeutic potential for human ADPKD.8 The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine/threonine kinase that functions as a sensor and integrator of nutrient availability and growth factor stimulation to regulate cell size, proliferation, and survival.9 Inhibition of mTOR signaling was proposed recently as a promising approach for treatment of ADPKD. The first clue that mTOR may be involved in the pathogenesis of ADPKD is provided by the observation of patients with a rare syndrome in which genomic deletion of PKD1 and the adjacent gene, TSC2, results in unusually severe renal cystic disease and ESRD by the second decade of life. TSC2 mutations cause tuberous sclerosis, another renal cystic disease, and tuberin, the protein encoded by TSC2, is an upstream regulator of mTOR. Thus, increased renal disease severity seen in this syndrome compared with ADPKD or tuberous sclerosis alone suggests a synergistic interaction of polycystin-1 and tuberin pathways, possibly through mTOR.10 In a later study, Shillingford et al.11 showed that polycystin-1 indeed interacts with tuberin in vitro, that mTOR activity is aberrantly activated in cystic epithelia of patients with ADPKD, and that experimental mTOR inhibition significantly ameliorates renal cystic disease in orpk-rescue and bpk mouse models. The efficacy of rapamycin was also demonstrated in the Han rat and folliculin mouse models of PKD,12 and two small, retrospective, case-control studies showed that rapamycin treatment associates with regression of native polycystic kidney or liver volume in renal transplant patients with ADPKD.11,13 Collectively, these data suggest a potential therapeutic role of mTOR inhibition in ADPKD; however, none of the experimental studies that demonstrate the efficacy of rapamycin used an orthologous model of human ADPKD. Nevertheless, two randomized clinical trials have been launched to test the efficacy of mTOR inhibition in ADPKD.8 In this issue of JASN, Shillingford et al.12 answer the much anticipated question, “Does mTOR inhibition work in an orthologous model of human ADPKD?” Using the Pkd1cond/cond:Nescre conditional null mice, they showed that nestin Cre-mediated deletion of Pkd1 alleles results in aberrant mTOR activation in cystic epithelia, moderate cystic disease by 4 weeks of age, and severe cystic disease and renal failure by 7 weeks of age. Experimental mTOR inhibition starting at 4 weeks of age results in dramatic regression of renal cyst size and preservation of renal function. Mechanistically, these therapeutic effects are related to decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis of cystic epithelia and decreased interstitial fibrosis. Moreover, although the rapamycin dosage (5 mg/kg) used is much higher than that used in organ transplants, the steady-state drug levels are comparable to those seen in transplant recipients. Taken together, these data demonstrate both efficacy and feasibility of this experimental approach and provides a strong justification for ongoing human clinical trials. Despite these promising results, it is unclear whether mTOR inhibition will work in human ADPKD. As acknowledged by Shillingford et al.,12 there is no perfect mouse model that completely replicates human ADPKD in which biallelic inactivation of PKD1 or PKD2 through germline and somatic mutations within individual epithelial cells is thought to be a common albeit nonexclusive mechanism for cyst formation.3–5,14,15 More recent studies showed the response of tubular epithelia to acquired somatic loss of Pkd1 is determined by the developmental state of the kidneys: Conditional inactivation of Pkd1 in mice before postnatal day 13 results in severely cystic kidneys within 3 to 6 weeks, whereas inactivation at day 14 or later results in focal cysts after 3 to 5 months and severe cystic disease only by 1 year of age.14,15 These dramatically different responses to Pkd1 inactivation between the very young and older mice suggest that different pathways may be altered between the two groups. To date, most published mouse models used for testing therapies for ADPKD (including this study, which induced early Pkd1 loss in a mosaic pattern) result in a rapid course, compressing into several months the cystic disease that develops over several decades in patients.14 Given the marked differences in the kinetics of cyst expansion,14,15 it is unclear whether any drug treatment proven effective in the early-onset models will be equally effective for the slowly progressive human ADPKD. In addition, serious long-term adverse effects of mTOR inhibition, particularly cancer, may not be predictable by animal studies. Thus, the efficacy and tolerability of mTOR inhibition in ADPKD can be answered ultimately only by well-conducted randomized, controlled trials of patients. With cautious optimism, the PKD community looks forward to the completion of the human studies. Disclosures Y.P. has served as a consultant for Novartis, Plexxikon, Roche, and Wyatt. This work was supported by a grant from Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,146
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,490

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1460,078

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2010
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the American Society of NephrologyMême sujetGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesTravaux en français237 207