MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999009082 · doi:10.1681/asn.2010010072

Of Mice and Men

2010· letter· en· W1999009082 on OpenAlexafffundabout
York Pei

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPKD1Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseasePolycystic kidney diseaseCiliumKidneyBiologyKidney diseaseDiseaseKidney developmentPathogenesisPositional cloningMedicineCell biologyInternal medicineBioinformaticsGeneticsEndocrinologyLocus (genetics)Gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common monogenic kidney disease and accounts for approximately 5% of ESRD in developed countries. Focal development of renal cysts, which increase in number and size with age, leads to distortion of the normal kidney architecture and ultimately ESRD in a majority of patients by the fifth decade of life. Currently, clinical management of ADPKD is limited to nonspecific measures such as BP control, dialysis, and transplantation. Most cases of ADPKD are due to mutations of two genes: PKD1 and PKD2. Positional cloning of PKD1 in 1995 and PKD2 in 1996 represented a major research landmark and provided researchers essential genomic reagents for elucidating the molecular pathogenesis of ADPKD.1,2 In the past 15 years, we have witnessed important advances in our fundamental understanding of ADPKD. For example, we have learned that polycystin-1 and -2, the proteins encoded by PKD1 and PKD2, respectively, are components of a novel multifunctional signaling pathway that regulates growth, differentiation, and maintenance of three-dimensional spatial orientation of tubular epithelial cells3; that complete loss or significant reduction of polycystin levels beyond a critical threshold within tubular epithelial cells triggers clonal formation of individual cysts4,5; that the polycystin-1/2 complex at the primary cilium serves as a mechanosensor of urine flow to modulate calcium influx and intracellular signaling3,6; and that perturbation of multiple signaling pathways modifies growth of renal cysts.7,8 The next decade holds the exciting possibility that some of these novel insights may be translated into mechanism-based drug treatments that target renal cyst growth and thereby delay or prevent ESRD. Indeed, a recent review highlighted at least six classes of drugs with distinct mechanisms to modulate intracellular calcium, cAMP, CFTR chloride channels, MAPK-ERK, mTOR signaling, or cell cycle that may have therapeutic potential for human ADPKD.8 The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine/threonine kinase that functions as a sensor and integrator of nutrient availability and growth factor stimulation to regulate cell size, proliferation, and survival.9 Inhibition of mTOR signaling was proposed recently as a promising approach for treatment of ADPKD. The first clue that mTOR may be involved in the pathogenesis of ADPKD is provided by the observation of patients with a rare syndrome in which genomic deletion of PKD1 and the adjacent gene, TSC2, results in unusually severe renal cystic disease and ESRD by the second decade of life. TSC2 mutations cause tuberous sclerosis, another renal cystic disease, and tuberin, the protein encoded by TSC2, is an upstream regulator of mTOR. Thus, increased renal disease severity seen in this syndrome compared with ADPKD or tuberous sclerosis alone suggests a synergistic interaction of polycystin-1 and tuberin pathways, possibly through mTOR.10 In a later study, Shillingford et al.11 showed that polycystin-1 indeed interacts with tuberin in vitro, that mTOR activity is aberrantly activated in cystic epithelia of patients with ADPKD, and that experimental mTOR inhibition significantly ameliorates renal cystic disease in orpk-rescue and bpk mouse models. The efficacy of rapamycin was also demonstrated in the Han rat and folliculin mouse models of PKD,12 and two small, retrospective, case-control studies showed that rapamycin treatment associates with regression of native polycystic kidney or liver volume in renal transplant patients with ADPKD.11,13 Collectively, these data suggest a potential therapeutic role of mTOR inhibition in ADPKD; however, none of the experimental studies that demonstrate the efficacy of rapamycin used an orthologous model of human ADPKD. Nevertheless, two randomized clinical trials have been launched to test the efficacy of mTOR inhibition in ADPKD.8 In this issue of JASN, Shillingford et al.12 answer the much anticipated question, “Does mTOR inhibition work in an orthologous model of human ADPKD?” Using the Pkd1cond/cond:Nescre conditional null mice, they showed that nestin Cre-mediated deletion of Pkd1 alleles results in aberrant mTOR activation in cystic epithelia, moderate cystic disease by 4 weeks of age, and severe cystic disease and renal failure by 7 weeks of age. Experimental mTOR inhibition starting at 4 weeks of age results in dramatic regression of renal cyst size and preservation of renal function. Mechanistically, these therapeutic effects are related to decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis of cystic epithelia and decreased interstitial fibrosis. Moreover, although the rapamycin dosage (5 mg/kg) used is much higher than that used in organ transplants, the steady-state drug levels are comparable to those seen in transplant recipients. Taken together, these data demonstrate both efficacy and feasibility of this experimental approach and provides a strong justification for ongoing human clinical trials. Despite these promising results, it is unclear whether mTOR inhibition will work in human ADPKD. As acknowledged by Shillingford et al.,12 there is no perfect mouse model that completely replicates human ADPKD in which biallelic inactivation of PKD1 or PKD2 through germline and somatic mutations within individual epithelial cells is thought to be a common albeit nonexclusive mechanism for cyst formation.3–5,14,15 More recent studies showed the response of tubular epithelia to acquired somatic loss of Pkd1 is determined by the developmental state of the kidneys: Conditional inactivation of Pkd1 in mice before postnatal day 13 results in severely cystic kidneys within 3 to 6 weeks, whereas inactivation at day 14 or later results in focal cysts after 3 to 5 months and severe cystic disease only by 1 year of age.14,15 These dramatically different responses to Pkd1 inactivation between the very young and older mice suggest that different pathways may be altered between the two groups. To date, most published mouse models used for testing therapies for ADPKD (including this study, which induced early Pkd1 loss in a mosaic pattern) result in a rapid course, compressing into several months the cystic disease that develops over several decades in patients.14 Given the marked differences in the kinetics of cyst expansion,14,15 it is unclear whether any drug treatment proven effective in the early-onset models will be equally effective for the slowly progressive human ADPKD. In addition, serious long-term adverse effects of mTOR inhibition, particularly cancer, may not be predictable by animal studies. Thus, the efficacy and tolerability of mTOR inhibition in ADPKD can be answered ultimately only by well-conducted randomized, controlled trials of patients. With cautious optimism, the PKD community looks forward to the completion of the human studies. Disclosures Y.P. has served as a consultant for Novartis, Plexxikon, Roche, and Wyatt. This work was supported by a grant from Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.078

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207