MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1999739374 · doi:10.1353/smr.2007.0017

Franz Kafka's The Trial: Four Stage Adaptions (review)

2007· article· en· W1999739374 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Anthony Northey

Notice bibliographique

RevueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueFranz Kafka Literary Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTemptationPityPeriod (music)IdeologyGermanHistoryPoliticsOrder (exchange)Art historyLiteratureClassicsPhilosophyArtAestheticsLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Franz Kafka's The Trial: Four Stage Adaptions Anthony Northey Paul M. Malone . Franz Kafka's The Trial: Four Stage Adaptions. German Studies in Canada 13. Frankfurt/M.: Lang, 2003. 289 pp. ISBN 3-631-50606-6. This interesting study looks at four adaptations of Kafka's famous novel. They come from France, Britain, Germany/Sweden, and Canada, and they span the period from 1947 to 1985, an almost forty-year period of political and ideological change in Western culture not to mention the mutations in theatre trends. As the author works out in detail, these aspects play an important role in how four different playwrights put The Trial on the stage and in some cases why they tackled the seemingly thankless task of doing so. Thankless, for usually critics of adaptations of famous works seem unable to resist the temptation to take the easy route of lamenting the audacity of reworking a modern classic in a different genre while extolling the original, which has already proved its worth. They seem to have trouble accepting the adaptations as separate entities, as works of art in their own right, a status Malone argues for in his introductory chapter. The adaptations he has chosen are Le Procès by André Gide and Jean-Louis Barrault; Steven Berkoff's The Trial; Der Prozeß by Peter Weiß; and Sally Clark's The Trial of Judith K. As Malone admits, at least one other version, a Czech one, had to be left out – a pity, since it would have provided an interpretation by a member of the cultural surrounding in which Kafka had lived, albeit in another era, and might have offered a view of totalitarianism different from that of Gide/Barrault. In the 1950 translation of the French version I recently found an interesting note: "This adaptation by Jacqueline and Frank Sundstrom was first performed at the Pasadena Playhouse, California, December 7th, 1949, under the direction of Frank Sundstrom, who played the part of K." Here is apparently an adaptation of an adaptation, which along with the performance might have provided yet another perspective. And then, too, one more adaptation might have deserved mention: The Scapegoat, by John Matthews, which was produced by Piscator's Dramatic Workshop and performed in the President Theatre, New York, on 19 April 1950. Using observations Roger Mirza has made on adaptation of prose works for the stage as a guide, Malone dissects the transition from one genre to the other, following the same basic pattern with each of the four Trials, give or take particularities of one or the other that merit individual attention (the input of Gide versus Barrault, for [End Page 83] example, or Sally Clark's efforts generally to gain recognition in the male dominated world of Canadian theatre). He begins with the adapter's background and the genesis of the adaptation, followed by a scene-to-scene comparison with Kafka's novel – with references to the other adaptations – and finishes with the critics' reception of the plays. It is here that the author shows his diligence in researching his subject. He has assiduously collected a wealth of comment, although the large number of critics' one-liners in his text sometimes threatens to make one lose sight of the forest for the trees. There is sporadic mention of the visual material Malone must have encountered during his extensive research. Plans of the sets, drawings, or photos might have aided in bringing the productions back to life a bit more vividly than words alone, but very likey the publisher would have balked at the increased cost of publishing them. Yet if enough of them still exist, they would perhaps be worth gathering and preserving for posterity in another future publication – certainly more than just a scholarly coffee-table book. Gide/Barrault were the first to face the problem of externalizing a novel that takes place inside the mind. Fresh from the horrors of Nazi occupation and the Holocaust and from the (often summary) postwar trials of collaborators, which also touched Barrault, they also "had to navigate around a resurgent conservatism that expressed its fears of being overwhelmed by middle-European (i.e. Jewish) literature...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,644
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,752

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,121
Tête enseignante GPT0,339
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesMême sujetFranz Kafka Literary StudiesTravaux en français237 207