MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2003498926 · doi:10.1353/lan.2000.0052

Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories Ed. by Keith Brown and JimMiller, and: Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of language Ed. by Peter V. Lamarque (review)

2000· article· en· W2003498926 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael A. Covington

Notice bibliographique

RevueLanguage · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLinguisticsUkrainianMetaphorNounMillerSociologyGrammarPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BOOK NOTICES 231 ing sociological, psychological and linguistic data', 124-36) propose a large-scale longitudinal project on immigrant identity and language choice, planning several sociolinguistic interviews for each of 100 subjects. Probably the most satisfying article here is that by Shana Poplack and Svitlana Budzhak-Jones, "The visible loanword: Processes of integration seen in bare English-origin nouns in Ukrainian', (137-67). With the goal of distinguishing codeswitching and borrowing, the authors compare grammatical treatment of English nouns in the Ukrainian discourse of first- and second-generation Ukrainian speakers in Canada. First-generation speakers treat English nouns as if they were Ukrainian, which argues for a bonowing rather than codeswitching analysis . Second generation speakers, in contrast, 'have not fully acquired either the presciptive details or variable conditioning of Ukrainian inflection' (159), suggesting that the vexed question of bonowing versus codeswitching may not be the most perspicacious approach to this generation's grammar. Only a loose thematic unity brings this volume together, but the variety of approaches attests to the widespread interest in second language acquisition and the likelihood that this book will interest a large audience. [Susan Meredith Burt, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh.] The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. By Ning Yu. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. Pp. vii, 278. Metaphor follows George Lakoffs view that 'figurative language lies at the core of communication and cognition' (2). Yu's stated goals in this book, a revision of his PhD dissertation, are to describe the mapping of the concrete and physical onto the abstract and nonphysical and to compare the Chinese with the English conceptual system. He says he wishes to 'call attention to the importance of metaphors in Chinese', and their 'considerable similarity' to their English counterparts (241). Y concentrates on three main types of metaphors: (1) those expressing anger and happiness, often as a liquid or gas in a container; (2) time as space, with objects moving toward or past a stationary observer, or with an observer walking through a stationary location ; and (3) events as attributes with a physical location (Tm in trouble.'). Y observes that while 'anger is heat' in both English and Chinese—following the métonymie principle of describing the physiological effects of emotions (237)—anger is often imagined as a 'hot liquid in a container' in English but as a 'gas' in Chinese. He also notes that Chinese tends to mention body parts explicitly in expressions involving emotion , e.g. 'spleen gas' means 'temper/anger', while English metaphors like 'he is seething with anger' mention no body part names. The book offers convenient summaries at the end of each topic-centered chapter plus a summary of the summaries in the conclusion. These may be a bit repetitive to an attentive reader, but they are useful for anyone who wants a quick, minimum-effort overview of Y's main points. Y certainly would have made things easier for most ofhis readers ifhe had incorporated the Chinese characters for the examples into the main text instead of relegating them to an appendix in the back of the book. There are a few minor typos, mostly in the Pinyin Romanizations, which very inconveniently lack tone markings. Y collected his data from the official PRC party organ, the People 's Daily, various other publications, and Chinese dictionaries. Y does point out that metaphors exist at different levels of awareness and intentionality . He may be right that more consciouslycreated metaphors are usually extensions of the relatively established ones in the language, but it might have been useful to clearly identify the 'basic' metaphors first, perhaps from a corpus of spoken rather than written Chinese. Many of the examples from the People 's Daily—which tends to employ a relatively stilted, bureaucratic style to report officially approved content—were 'sore thumb' metaphors that stood out as such in a text (example: 'The economy needs soft braking and soft landing.'); while in fact probably few people are conscious of 'gas' being a metaphor when they say someone 'got angry'. Some of the dictionary examples cited, like qián chén, 'previous dust' meaning 'past experience', are low frequency , literary, or dated items, though Y acknowledges this where...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,122
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,408

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0070,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0040,007
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1220,097

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLanguageMême sujetLanguage, Metaphor, and CognitionTravaux en français237 207