MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2005577743 · doi:10.1002/pbc.20158

Pediatric oncology in Norway

2004· article· en· W2005577743 sur OpenAlexaff
Arty R. Coppes‐Zantinga, Max J. Coppes

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Établissements canadiensAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPopulationMedicineHealth careNorwegianEconomic growthSocioeconomicsGeographyEnvironmental healthEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

With a population of approximately 4.6 million scattered over roughly 320,000 km2, Norway's population density is only ∼14 persons per km2. Almost one third of the country is north of the Arctic Circle, and only one in every 12 Norwegians lives there. Geographically, it is a very long country: the distance from the northernmost point to the farthest south is equal to the distance from the southern border of the country to Rome, Italy. Throughout most of history, Norway has been a poor country, with few natural resources of value. This has changed drastically in the past half century. Today, effective use of hydroelectric resources, industrialization, and 30 years of harvesting oil from the North Sea have made Norway one of the most prosperous countries in Europe. According to the economist, Norway's nominal GDP of US $ 191 billion in 2002 places the country only as 12th out of 19 West European countries, but their relatively small population results in a GDP per person (US $ 37,024), that makes Norway one of the wealthiest countries in the world 1. Free health care access has always been regarded as a basic human right in the Scandinavian countries, including Norway. A small fee is paid for visiting primary health care and outpatient clinics, but hospital services are free of charge for every citizen. Private hospitals are rare, and only recently have private initiatives in health service delivery been accepted as a valid supplement to public sector care. While pediatrics as a discipline evolved in the 19th century, it would take until just over two decades ago for an academic Department of Pediatrics to be established. The first Department of Pediatrics (Fig. 1) was established in January 1833 at The National Hospital (Rikshospitalet) in Oslo, Norway's capital, at a time when Norway had an infant mortality of over 100 per 1,000 life births. Since its inception, the department has been led by only five physicians, providing it with consistency in leadership and direction. Children's Ward at the National Hospital, circa 1883 (courtesy Prof. Sverre Lie). Until 1950, the Department of Pediatrics at the Rikshospitalet remained the only one of its kind in Norway. As such, it played an important role in the development of childhood health care services. In between the two World Wars, the department guided Norway in developing nutritional recommendation for babies and children. Prof. Theodor Bruun Frølich (1870–1947) for example, published several distinguished manuscripts on vitamin C and made great contributions to the nutrition of infants and children 2. In addition, the department contributed in developing effective disease prophylaxis strategies. After WWII, pediatrics as a subspecialty took off in Norway. This was the result of two events. First, the Norwegian Government made children's health a top priority. Second, Sweden, neutral during WWII, expressed a sincere desire after 1945 to contribute to Norway's post-war reconstruction. As a nation, Sweden provided1 Norway with two modern pediatric departments, one built in Oslo as part of the National Hospital, the other in Bergen. Soon thereafter, the Community Hospital in Oslo (Ullevål) also established a Department of Pediatrics. Within the next 15–20 years pediatric departments were established in many provinces. Today there are 19 pediatric departments with a total of 815 beds. In Norway, pediatrics is one of the busiest specialties with over 50,000 admissions annually. The Pediatric Department at the National Hospital in Oslo has been the center of the development of modern pediatrics in Norway. All the major pediatric subspecialties were initiated and developed at this institution. The new department, inaugurated in 1950, was led by Prof. Leif Salomonsen until 1967. Pediatric Hematology/Oncology was pioneered by Prof. Martin Seip together with Prof. Peter Johan Moe in the late 1950s. Dr. Seip had studied with Dr. Louis Diamond in Boston and was the first to describe total lipodystrophy 3, a condition that carries his name (Berardinelli–Seip syndrome). Seip also introduced leukemia therapy in this country in the late 1950s. Prof. Moe's main contribution was the introduction of high-dose methotrexate in the management of leukemia, thereby reducing the need for cranial irradiation in the treatment of this disease 4,5. Prof. Sverre O. Lie, SIOPs host this year, has been part of the pediatric oncology department since 1972. Today, the division is comprised of four staff physicians, three fellows, and 32 nurses. The 14-bed unit serves approximately 50 new patients with cancer each year and, as the only BMT center of the country, 10–20 patients requiring hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation. Together with his Scandinivian colleagues, Prof. Lie founded the Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (NOPHO) in 1981. As a result, today there are common diagnostic and therapy protocols in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden for many pediatric malignancies, including ALL, AML, and lymphomas. NOPHO has made several seminal contributions to the management of childhood cancers 6-8. In May 2000, the National Hospital (Rikshospitalet) moved to a new site in Gaustad, just outside Oslo. The new Rikshospitalet is aesthetically quite remarkable and has won several architectural awards. The art at this institution is Norway's largest public collection of art outside museums. This hospital currently employs over 4,000 people, including 500 physicians and over 1,500 nurses. The Department of Pediatrics has its own wings (Fig. 2), looking out into the wilderness. One of the two wings hosts the magnificent oncology ward. The National Hospital is host to the pre-congress meeting and is certainly worth a visit. Pediatric wings of new Children's Hospital, summer 2000 (courtesy Prof. Sverre Lie). With gratitude for his friendship and help, we acknowledge the input, information, and photographs provided to us by Prof. Sverre Lie. His comments and suggestions have been invaluable in preparing this manuscript.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,036
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,096

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0290,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,307 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePediatric Blood & CancerMême sujetChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeTravaux en français237 207