MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005577743 · doi:10.1002/pbc.20158

Pediatric oncology in Norway

2004· article· en· W2005577743 on OpenAlexaff
Arty R. Coppes‐Zantinga, Max J. Coppes

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationMedicineHealth careNorwegianEconomic growthSocioeconomicsGeographyEnvironmental healthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With a population of approximately 4.6 million scattered over roughly 320,000 km2, Norway's population density is only ∼14 persons per km2. Almost one third of the country is north of the Arctic Circle, and only one in every 12 Norwegians lives there. Geographically, it is a very long country: the distance from the northernmost point to the farthest south is equal to the distance from the southern border of the country to Rome, Italy. Throughout most of history, Norway has been a poor country, with few natural resources of value. This has changed drastically in the past half century. Today, effective use of hydroelectric resources, industrialization, and 30 years of harvesting oil from the North Sea have made Norway one of the most prosperous countries in Europe. According to the economist, Norway's nominal GDP of US $ 191 billion in 2002 places the country only as 12th out of 19 West European countries, but their relatively small population results in a GDP per person (US $ 37,024), that makes Norway one of the wealthiest countries in the world 1. Free health care access has always been regarded as a basic human right in the Scandinavian countries, including Norway. A small fee is paid for visiting primary health care and outpatient clinics, but hospital services are free of charge for every citizen. Private hospitals are rare, and only recently have private initiatives in health service delivery been accepted as a valid supplement to public sector care. While pediatrics as a discipline evolved in the 19th century, it would take until just over two decades ago for an academic Department of Pediatrics to be established. The first Department of Pediatrics (Fig. 1) was established in January 1833 at The National Hospital (Rikshospitalet) in Oslo, Norway's capital, at a time when Norway had an infant mortality of over 100 per 1,000 life births. Since its inception, the department has been led by only five physicians, providing it with consistency in leadership and direction. Children's Ward at the National Hospital, circa 1883 (courtesy Prof. Sverre Lie). Until 1950, the Department of Pediatrics at the Rikshospitalet remained the only one of its kind in Norway. As such, it played an important role in the development of childhood health care services. In between the two World Wars, the department guided Norway in developing nutritional recommendation for babies and children. Prof. Theodor Bruun Frølich (1870–1947) for example, published several distinguished manuscripts on vitamin C and made great contributions to the nutrition of infants and children 2. In addition, the department contributed in developing effective disease prophylaxis strategies. After WWII, pediatrics as a subspecialty took off in Norway. This was the result of two events. First, the Norwegian Government made children's health a top priority. Second, Sweden, neutral during WWII, expressed a sincere desire after 1945 to contribute to Norway's post-war reconstruction. As a nation, Sweden provided1 Norway with two modern pediatric departments, one built in Oslo as part of the National Hospital, the other in Bergen. Soon thereafter, the Community Hospital in Oslo (Ullevål) also established a Department of Pediatrics. Within the next 15–20 years pediatric departments were established in many provinces. Today there are 19 pediatric departments with a total of 815 beds. In Norway, pediatrics is one of the busiest specialties with over 50,000 admissions annually. The Pediatric Department at the National Hospital in Oslo has been the center of the development of modern pediatrics in Norway. All the major pediatric subspecialties were initiated and developed at this institution. The new department, inaugurated in 1950, was led by Prof. Leif Salomonsen until 1967. Pediatric Hematology/Oncology was pioneered by Prof. Martin Seip together with Prof. Peter Johan Moe in the late 1950s. Dr. Seip had studied with Dr. Louis Diamond in Boston and was the first to describe total lipodystrophy 3, a condition that carries his name (Berardinelli–Seip syndrome). Seip also introduced leukemia therapy in this country in the late 1950s. Prof. Moe's main contribution was the introduction of high-dose methotrexate in the management of leukemia, thereby reducing the need for cranial irradiation in the treatment of this disease 4,5. Prof. Sverre O. Lie, SIOPs host this year, has been part of the pediatric oncology department since 1972. Today, the division is comprised of four staff physicians, three fellows, and 32 nurses. The 14-bed unit serves approximately 50 new patients with cancer each year and, as the only BMT center of the country, 10–20 patients requiring hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation. Together with his Scandinivian colleagues, Prof. Lie founded the Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (NOPHO) in 1981. As a result, today there are common diagnostic and therapy protocols in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden for many pediatric malignancies, including ALL, AML, and lymphomas. NOPHO has made several seminal contributions to the management of childhood cancers 6-8. In May 2000, the National Hospital (Rikshospitalet) moved to a new site in Gaustad, just outside Oslo. The new Rikshospitalet is aesthetically quite remarkable and has won several architectural awards. The art at this institution is Norway's largest public collection of art outside museums. This hospital currently employs over 4,000 people, including 500 physicians and over 1,500 nurses. The Department of Pediatrics has its own wings (Fig. 2), looking out into the wilderness. One of the two wings hosts the magnificent oncology ward. The National Hospital is host to the pre-congress meeting and is certainly worth a visit. Pediatric wings of new Children's Hospital, summer 2000 (courtesy Prof. Sverre Lie). With gratitude for his friendship and help, we acknowledge the input, information, and photographs provided to us by Prof. Sverre Lie. His comments and suggestions have been invaluable in preparing this manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207