MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2005793118 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181dab2c2

Fluorescent Intraoperative Tissue Angiography with Indocyanine Green: Evaluation of Nipple-Areola Vascularity during Breast Reduction Surgery

2010· article· en· W2005793118 sur OpenAlex
John Murray, Glyn Jones, Eric T. Elwood, Lisa A. Whitty, Chris Garcia

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineIndocyanine greenAreolaVascularitySurgeryPerfusionBreast surgeryAngiographyDissection (medical)RadiologyBreast cancerInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir: Intraoperative evaluation of the nipple-areola complex during breast reduction surgery can be difficult. Nipple-areola complexes that preoperatively are very pale or very dark may present the greatest challenge in this clinical evaluation, either during dissection of the pedicle or after inset of the nipple-areola complex. However, fluorescent intraoperative tissue angiography with indocyanine green assists the surgeon in evaluating nipple vascularity. All women who were to undergo breast reduction surgery were candidates for this study. Women with an allergy to iodinated contrast dye were excluded. All breasts underwent reduction using a superior, superomedial, or inferior pedicle. Immediately after dissection of the pedicle, 4 ml (2.5 mg/ml) of indocyanine green (Akorn, Inc., Buffalo Grove, Ill.) was infused through a peripheral intravenous catheter by the anesthesia personnel, followed by a 10-ml saline flush. Eight seconds after infusion, real-time fluorescent videoangiography of the nipple-areola complex was captured for 1 minute using the Novadaq Spy SP2001 imaging laser (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Arterial phase imaging was initially completed, before inset of the nipple-areola complex. If nipple-areola complex perfusion proved acceptable, the nipple-areola complex was then inset. After being inset, the nipple-areola complex was once again imaged in arterial phase using the same technique (Fig. 1). If perfusion once again appeared acceptable, the nipple-areola complex was imaged 10 minutes later without indocyanine green injection, to examine venous outflow (Fig. 2). If nipple-areola complex outflow was compromised, as seen with a persistently bright fluorescence, the pedicle or skin flaps would be revised or the nipple-areola complex would be grafted.Fig. 1.: Fluorescence of the nipple-areola complex after inset, 1 minute after indocyanine green infusion, showing excellent arterial perfusion.Fig. 2.: Indocyanine green fluorescence of the same nipple-areola complex 10 minutes after indocyanine green infusion, representative of the venous phase. Note the minimal fluorescence of the nipple-areola complex, consistent with excellent venous outflow.In 12 women, we completed 22 reduction mammaplasties. The average notch-to-nipple distance was 33 cm and the average resection weight was a 635 g. Preoperatively, three nipples were very pale, eight nipples were cream colored, seven were tan, two were light brown, and two were dark brown. All nipple-areola complexes exhibited healthy arterial and venous phases after inset. All breasts healed without complication and with acceptable cosmetic appearance. Although intraoperative surgical decisions were not altered based on these images, they nonetheless supported the surgeon's operative evaluation. Fluorescent tissue imaging has been widely used for many years, especially with fluorescein.1 However, fluorescein can only be injected once during an operation because of its long half-life, typically fading over 24 hours after injection. However, as indocyanine green is hepatically metabolized, its half-life is 2.5 to 3 minutes. Indocyanine green may be injected multiple times during an operation to evaluate potentially ischemic or congested tissues.2 In addition, indocyanine green binds to albumin, allowing it to remain intravascular. As indocyanine green remains in congested tissues, it will remain highly luminescent. Indocyanine green has proven helpful to evaluate perfusion of soft tissue in many clinical settings, to include open heart surgery, burn surgery, free tissue transfer, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction.3–5 Intraoperative fluorescence of the nipple-areola complex with indocyanine green during reduction mammaplasty helps to evaluate the nipple-areola complex for vascular compromise. Indocyanine green videofluorography may be used repeatedly during the same operation and helps to evaluate both the arterial microcirculatory inflow and venous outflow. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to disclose in relation to the content of this article. John D. Murray, M.D. Glyn E. Jones, M.D. Eric T. Elwood, M.D. Lisa A. Whitty, M.D. Chris Garcia, B.S. University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria Peoria, Ill.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,218
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,246
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle