MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005793118 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181dab2c2

Fluorescent Intraoperative Tissue Angiography with Indocyanine Green: Evaluation of Nipple-Areola Vascularity during Breast Reduction Surgery

2010· article· en· W2005793118 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Murray, Glyn Jones, Eric T. Elwood, Lisa A. Whitty, Chris Garcia

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIndocyanine greenAreolaVascularitySurgeryPerfusionBreast surgeryAngiographyDissection (medical)RadiologyBreast cancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir: Intraoperative evaluation of the nipple-areola complex during breast reduction surgery can be difficult. Nipple-areola complexes that preoperatively are very pale or very dark may present the greatest challenge in this clinical evaluation, either during dissection of the pedicle or after inset of the nipple-areola complex. However, fluorescent intraoperative tissue angiography with indocyanine green assists the surgeon in evaluating nipple vascularity. All women who were to undergo breast reduction surgery were candidates for this study. Women with an allergy to iodinated contrast dye were excluded. All breasts underwent reduction using a superior, superomedial, or inferior pedicle. Immediately after dissection of the pedicle, 4 ml (2.5 mg/ml) of indocyanine green (Akorn, Inc., Buffalo Grove, Ill.) was infused through a peripheral intravenous catheter by the anesthesia personnel, followed by a 10-ml saline flush. Eight seconds after infusion, real-time fluorescent videoangiography of the nipple-areola complex was captured for 1 minute using the Novadaq Spy SP2001 imaging laser (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Arterial phase imaging was initially completed, before inset of the nipple-areola complex. If nipple-areola complex perfusion proved acceptable, the nipple-areola complex was then inset. After being inset, the nipple-areola complex was once again imaged in arterial phase using the same technique (Fig. 1). If perfusion once again appeared acceptable, the nipple-areola complex was imaged 10 minutes later without indocyanine green injection, to examine venous outflow (Fig. 2). If nipple-areola complex outflow was compromised, as seen with a persistently bright fluorescence, the pedicle or skin flaps would be revised or the nipple-areola complex would be grafted.Fig. 1.: Fluorescence of the nipple-areola complex after inset, 1 minute after indocyanine green infusion, showing excellent arterial perfusion.Fig. 2.: Indocyanine green fluorescence of the same nipple-areola complex 10 minutes after indocyanine green infusion, representative of the venous phase. Note the minimal fluorescence of the nipple-areola complex, consistent with excellent venous outflow.In 12 women, we completed 22 reduction mammaplasties. The average notch-to-nipple distance was 33 cm and the average resection weight was a 635 g. Preoperatively, three nipples were very pale, eight nipples were cream colored, seven were tan, two were light brown, and two were dark brown. All nipple-areola complexes exhibited healthy arterial and venous phases after inset. All breasts healed without complication and with acceptable cosmetic appearance. Although intraoperative surgical decisions were not altered based on these images, they nonetheless supported the surgeon's operative evaluation. Fluorescent tissue imaging has been widely used for many years, especially with fluorescein.1 However, fluorescein can only be injected once during an operation because of its long half-life, typically fading over 24 hours after injection. However, as indocyanine green is hepatically metabolized, its half-life is 2.5 to 3 minutes. Indocyanine green may be injected multiple times during an operation to evaluate potentially ischemic or congested tissues.2 In addition, indocyanine green binds to albumin, allowing it to remain intravascular. As indocyanine green remains in congested tissues, it will remain highly luminescent. Indocyanine green has proven helpful to evaluate perfusion of soft tissue in many clinical settings, to include open heart surgery, burn surgery, free tissue transfer, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction.3–5 Intraoperative fluorescence of the nipple-areola complex with indocyanine green during reduction mammaplasty helps to evaluate the nipple-areola complex for vascular compromise. Indocyanine green videofluorography may be used repeatedly during the same operation and helps to evaluate both the arterial microcirculatory inflow and venous outflow. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to disclose in relation to the content of this article. John D. Murray, M.D. Glyn E. Jones, M.D. Eric T. Elwood, M.D. Lisa A. Whitty, M.D. Chris Garcia, B.S. University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria Peoria, Ill.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesFrench-language works237,207