MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2007214708 · doi:10.1002/mds.25245

<i>C9ORF72</i> expansion is not a significant cause of sporadic spinocerebellar ataxia

2012· letter· en· W2007214708 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brent L. Fogel, Mochtar Pribadi, Sarah Pi, Susan Perlman, Daniel H. Geschwind, Giovanni Coppola

Notice bibliographique

RevueMovement Disorders · 2012
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental Health
Mots-clésC9orf72Spinocerebellar ataxiaFrontotemporal dementiaAtaxiaAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisCerebellar ataxiaTrinucleotide repeat expansionParkinsonismAtrophyDementiaCerebellumPathologyPsychologyNeuroscienceMedicineGeneticsDiseaseBiologyAlleleGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Hexanucleotide expansions within the first intron of the C9ORF72 gene are a significant cause of familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), alone or in combination, as well as sporadic ALS worldwide.1-3 Several recent reports have described cases that broaden the clinical phenotype to include behavioral-variant FTD with or without early psychiatric presentations and parkinsonian features4, 5 and primary progressive aphasia.6 There is also a report of a patient with a family history of ALS and cerebellar ataxia,5 an intriguing finding as neuroimaging of C9ORF72 patients shows cerebellar atrophy, which is not typically observed with other FTD-related mutations such as MAPT or GRN.7 Cerebellar neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions have also been observed in multiple studies,6, 7 yet clinical cerebellar ataxia has not been detected in any large cohorts of C9ORF72 patients with FTD and/or ALS.1-3, 7 Because a majority of adult-onset ataxia cases are of unknown etiology, these observations raise the possibility that C9ORF72 may contribute to the development of sporadic spinocerebellar ataxia. To address this question, we examined 209 adult-onset sporadic ataxia patients for C9ORF7 hexanucleotide expansion (Table 1). All patients were screened for common genetic spinocerebellar ataxias including SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, and/or Friedreich ataxia. Most patients (40%) had pure cerebellar ataxia, but given the known C9ORF72 phenotypes, cases associated with upper motor neuron signs, dementia, and parkinsonism were also included. Approximately one third of these patients met possible or probable criteria for multiple system atrophy. Testing was performed as previously described,3 and only 1 positive case was identified (1 of 209, 0.5%). This patient, currently age 53, developed slowly progressive cerebellar dysfunction in her early 20s with falls by age 25. Upper motor neuron features of increased lower extremity tone and hyperreflexia were present, but annual assessments have shown no lower motor neuron involvement or cognitive decline. MRI has shown cerebellar atrophy with no frontal or temporal involvement. Evaluation for other genetic causes involving the APTX, ATN1, ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, ATXN7, ATXN8, ATXN10, CACNA1A, FMR1, FXN, KCNC3, PRKCG, PP2R2B, SACS, SETX, SPTBN2, and TBP genes was unremarkable. She is white with French-Canadian ancestry. As with the prior reported C9ORF72 ataxia case,5 family history was notable for her father and paternal uncle being diagnosed with ALS and dying within 2 years of symptom onset. There were no other affected family members. We speculate that the clinical findings seen in our patient represent a rare (<1%) C9ORF72 phenotype5; however, given the lack of other affected family members or unrelated cases, we cannot confirm this. C9ORF72 penetrance varies by age, with full penetrance occurring by the ninth decade,1 and it is possible that our patient will still develop a more classic phenotype. Regardless, this study does not support genetic testing for C9ORF72 expansion in sporadic spinocerebellar ataxia, although, as our study only examined sporadic-onset cases, it remains possible that C9ORF72 may contribute more significantly to dominant familial forms. For now, C9ORF72 testing would only be indicated for ataxia patients with a family history of ALS and/or FTD. We thank all the patients and their families who contributed to this project. Brent L. Fogel and Giovanni Coppola were responsible for the conception and design of the research project. Mochtar Pribadi and Sarah Pi were responsible for project execution. Susan L. Perlman and Daniel H. Geschwind supervised the clinical phenotyping and the molecular aspects of the project, respectively. Brent L. Fogel wrote the manuscript, and Brent L. Fogel, Giovanni Coppola, Susan L. Perlman, and Daniel H. Geschwind were responsible for its review and critique. Financial Disclosures: Mochtar Pribadi and Sarah Pi have nothing to disclose. Brent L. Fogel has received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Ataxia Foundation. Susan L. Perlman has received support from Santhera Pharmaceuticals to conduct a phase 3 idebenone study. Daniel H. Geschwind has received royalty payments from Yale University and Chemicon for antibody sales and funding from the NIH and private foundations. Giovanni Coppola has received funding from the NIH, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and private foundations. Brent L. Fogel MD, PhD*, Mochtar Pribadi PhD*, Sarah Pi*, Susan L. Perlman MD*, Daniel H. Geschwind MD, PhD* , Giovanni Coppola MD* , * Program in Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, California, USA, Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA, Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations22
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMovement DisordersMême sujetAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchTravaux en français237 207