MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2007214708 · doi:10.1002/mds.25245

<i>C9ORF72</i> expansion is not a significant cause of sporadic spinocerebellar ataxia

2012· letter· en· W2007214708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brent L. Fogel, Mochtar Pribadi, Sarah Pi, Susan Perlman, Daniel H. Geschwind, Giovanni Coppola

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental Health
KeywordsC9orf72Spinocerebellar ataxiaFrontotemporal dementiaAtaxiaAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisCerebellar ataxiaTrinucleotide repeat expansionParkinsonismAtrophyDementiaCerebellumPathologyPsychologyNeuroscienceMedicineGeneticsDiseaseBiologyAlleleGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hexanucleotide expansions within the first intron of the C9ORF72 gene are a significant cause of familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), alone or in combination, as well as sporadic ALS worldwide.1-3 Several recent reports have described cases that broaden the clinical phenotype to include behavioral-variant FTD with or without early psychiatric presentations and parkinsonian features4, 5 and primary progressive aphasia.6 There is also a report of a patient with a family history of ALS and cerebellar ataxia,5 an intriguing finding as neuroimaging of C9ORF72 patients shows cerebellar atrophy, which is not typically observed with other FTD-related mutations such as MAPT or GRN.7 Cerebellar neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions have also been observed in multiple studies,6, 7 yet clinical cerebellar ataxia has not been detected in any large cohorts of C9ORF72 patients with FTD and/or ALS.1-3, 7 Because a majority of adult-onset ataxia cases are of unknown etiology, these observations raise the possibility that C9ORF72 may contribute to the development of sporadic spinocerebellar ataxia. To address this question, we examined 209 adult-onset sporadic ataxia patients for C9ORF7 hexanucleotide expansion (Table 1). All patients were screened for common genetic spinocerebellar ataxias including SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, and/or Friedreich ataxia. Most patients (40%) had pure cerebellar ataxia, but given the known C9ORF72 phenotypes, cases associated with upper motor neuron signs, dementia, and parkinsonism were also included. Approximately one third of these patients met possible or probable criteria for multiple system atrophy. Testing was performed as previously described,3 and only 1 positive case was identified (1 of 209, 0.5%). This patient, currently age 53, developed slowly progressive cerebellar dysfunction in her early 20s with falls by age 25. Upper motor neuron features of increased lower extremity tone and hyperreflexia were present, but annual assessments have shown no lower motor neuron involvement or cognitive decline. MRI has shown cerebellar atrophy with no frontal or temporal involvement. Evaluation for other genetic causes involving the APTX, ATN1, ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, ATXN7, ATXN8, ATXN10, CACNA1A, FMR1, FXN, KCNC3, PRKCG, PP2R2B, SACS, SETX, SPTBN2, and TBP genes was unremarkable. She is white with French-Canadian ancestry. As with the prior reported C9ORF72 ataxia case,5 family history was notable for her father and paternal uncle being diagnosed with ALS and dying within 2 years of symptom onset. There were no other affected family members. We speculate that the clinical findings seen in our patient represent a rare (<1%) C9ORF72 phenotype5; however, given the lack of other affected family members or unrelated cases, we cannot confirm this. C9ORF72 penetrance varies by age, with full penetrance occurring by the ninth decade,1 and it is possible that our patient will still develop a more classic phenotype. Regardless, this study does not support genetic testing for C9ORF72 expansion in sporadic spinocerebellar ataxia, although, as our study only examined sporadic-onset cases, it remains possible that C9ORF72 may contribute more significantly to dominant familial forms. For now, C9ORF72 testing would only be indicated for ataxia patients with a family history of ALS and/or FTD. We thank all the patients and their families who contributed to this project. Brent L. Fogel and Giovanni Coppola were responsible for the conception and design of the research project. Mochtar Pribadi and Sarah Pi were responsible for project execution. Susan L. Perlman and Daniel H. Geschwind supervised the clinical phenotyping and the molecular aspects of the project, respectively. Brent L. Fogel wrote the manuscript, and Brent L. Fogel, Giovanni Coppola, Susan L. Perlman, and Daniel H. Geschwind were responsible for its review and critique. Financial Disclosures: Mochtar Pribadi and Sarah Pi have nothing to disclose. Brent L. Fogel has received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Ataxia Foundation. Susan L. Perlman has received support from Santhera Pharmaceuticals to conduct a phase 3 idebenone study. Daniel H. Geschwind has received royalty payments from Yale University and Chemicon for antibody sales and funding from the NIH and private foundations. Giovanni Coppola has received funding from the NIH, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, and private foundations. Brent L. Fogel MD, PhD*, Mochtar Pribadi PhD*, Sarah Pi*, Susan L. Perlman MD*, Daniel H. Geschwind MD, PhD* , Giovanni Coppola MD* , * Program in Neurogenetics, Department of Neurology David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, California, USA, Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA, Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207