Unexpected Periaortic Cavity During Heart Surgery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 43-year-old man was referred to our institution for surgical correction of aortic valvular disease discovered in the context of new onset aortic insufficiency with acute pulmonary edema. The patient had no medical history of cardiac disease besides an “innocent” heart murmur since youth, which had never been investigated. Of note, he had an acute episode of glomerulonephritis with secondary renal insufficiency and systemic hypertension 6 mo before, and septicemia from an infected percutaneous hemodialysis catheter 5 mo before admission. The patient was afebrile, appeared nonseptic at the time of admission for surgery. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed Grade IV aortic insufficiency and moderate aortic stenosis. There were no other abnormalities described. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination revealed a pulsatile cavity on the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa in the mid-esophageal long-axis view, close to the noncoronary cusp of a bicuspid aortic valve. The cavity had pronounced systolic enlargement (Fig. 1). Systolic flow in the cavity was apparent using color flow Doppler (Fig. 2; video loop can be accessed at www.anesthesia-analgesia.org).Figure 1.: Mid-esophageal long-axis view in end systole. The left ventricular outflow tract pseudoaneurysm (arrow) is at maximal size.Figure 2.: Mid-esophageal long-axis view displaying M-mode of the left ventricular outflow tract showing the holosystolic filling (white arrow) and diastolic emptying of the pseudoaneurysm.Visual inspection of the aortic valve showed no evidence of endocarditis. The presence of this undiagnosed cavity was confirmed by the surgeon, who isolated it from the left ventricle by means of an autologous pericardial patch. After aortic valve replacement, TEE showed significant reduction of flow in the cavity. The postoperative course was uneventful. A subsequent TTE study failed to show any residual cavity. Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) pseudoaneurysms, or pseudoaneurysms of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa, are rare complications of infective aortic endocarditis, trauma, and aortic valve replacement surgery. This is the first case of LVOT abscess that we have encountered in a 13-year-TEE database of approximately 8500 examinations. The incidence of fistulas or pseudoaneurysm complicating aortic annular abscesses is estimated to be 11% (1). Pseudoaneurysms associated with infective endocarditis of the aortic valve can occur anywhere from the left ventricle to more distal arteries, such as the superior mesenteric artery. Echocardiographic criteria of an LVOT pseudoaneurysm include a pulsatile nature (with systolic enlargement, easily diagnosed using M-mode) and communication with the LVOT (2). These can be associated with aortic regurgitation and rarely, mitral regurgitation. In one small study, it was shown that pseudoaneurysms of the LVOT are more readily observed with TEE than with TTE or aortography (3). In this case, the bicuspid aortic valve may have predisposed the patient to infective endocarditis, which may have been effectively treated with antibiotic therapy of his infected dialysis catheter. The pseudoaneurysm may have developed shortly thereafter.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».