MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unexpected Periaortic Cavity During Heart Surgery

2006· article· en· W2009144821 on OpenAlexaff
S bastien Garneau, Philippe Demers, Andr Y. Denault

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricular outflow tractCardiologyInternal medicinePseudoaneurysmAortic valveDiastoleSurgeryBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 43-year-old man was referred to our institution for surgical correction of aortic valvular disease discovered in the context of new onset aortic insufficiency with acute pulmonary edema. The patient had no medical history of cardiac disease besides an “innocent” heart murmur since youth, which had never been investigated. Of note, he had an acute episode of glomerulonephritis with secondary renal insufficiency and systemic hypertension 6 mo before, and septicemia from an infected percutaneous hemodialysis catheter 5 mo before admission. The patient was afebrile, appeared nonseptic at the time of admission for surgery. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed Grade IV aortic insufficiency and moderate aortic stenosis. There were no other abnormalities described. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination revealed a pulsatile cavity on the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa in the mid-esophageal long-axis view, close to the noncoronary cusp of a bicuspid aortic valve. The cavity had pronounced systolic enlargement (Fig. 1). Systolic flow in the cavity was apparent using color flow Doppler (Fig. 2; video loop can be accessed at www.anesthesia-analgesia.org).Figure 1.: Mid-esophageal long-axis view in end systole. The left ventricular outflow tract pseudoaneurysm (arrow) is at maximal size.Figure 2.: Mid-esophageal long-axis view displaying M-mode of the left ventricular outflow tract showing the holosystolic filling (white arrow) and diastolic emptying of the pseudoaneurysm.Visual inspection of the aortic valve showed no evidence of endocarditis. The presence of this undiagnosed cavity was confirmed by the surgeon, who isolated it from the left ventricle by means of an autologous pericardial patch. After aortic valve replacement, TEE showed significant reduction of flow in the cavity. The postoperative course was uneventful. A subsequent TTE study failed to show any residual cavity. Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) pseudoaneurysms, or pseudoaneurysms of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa, are rare complications of infective aortic endocarditis, trauma, and aortic valve replacement surgery. This is the first case of LVOT abscess that we have encountered in a 13-year-TEE database of approximately 8500 examinations. The incidence of fistulas or pseudoaneurysm complicating aortic annular abscesses is estimated to be 11% (1). Pseudoaneurysms associated with infective endocarditis of the aortic valve can occur anywhere from the left ventricle to more distal arteries, such as the superior mesenteric artery. Echocardiographic criteria of an LVOT pseudoaneurysm include a pulsatile nature (with systolic enlargement, easily diagnosed using M-mode) and communication with the LVOT (2). These can be associated with aortic regurgitation and rarely, mitral regurgitation. In one small study, it was shown that pseudoaneurysms of the LVOT are more readily observed with TEE than with TTE or aortography (3). In this case, the bicuspid aortic valve may have predisposed the patient to infective endocarditis, which may have been effectively treated with antibiotic therapy of his infected dialysis catheter. The pseudoaneurysm may have developed shortly thereafter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207