MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2010229032 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2010.0005

The Politics and Poetics of Sisterhood: Anna Mary Howitt's The Sisters in Art

2010· article· en· W2010229032 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alexandra K. Wettlaufer

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTravel Writing and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoeticsPoliticsIdentity (music)Order (exchange)PaintingArtArt historySociologyAestheticsLiteratureGender studiesLawPoetryPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Politics and Poetics of Sisterhood:Anna Mary Howitt's The Sisters in Art Alexandra Wettlaufer (bio) The emergence of the professional female painter during the Victorian period was notably tied to political as well as economic and aesthetic concerns. As Deborah Cherry reminds us, art "became a battleground for intense debates about the role of women in contemporary society" when the 1840s and 1850s produced a number of young women who became both "artists and activists" (Beyond the Frame 11). As women entered the field of cultural production in unprecedented numbers during the Victorian era, many self-consciously constructed an artistic identity that engaged with larger issues of representation, gender, labour, education, and collectivity. Striking in these works of the 1840s to the 1860s is the common desire to shift away from the idea of the "exceptional woman" as artist—embodied in Mme de Staël's fictitious Corinne and the real-life careers of eighteenth-century painters Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun and Angelica Kauffman—and to forge a definition of art that could encompass all women—not just singular and exceptional women—in its norms and hierarchies. For, as Mary Sheriff so eloquently demonstrates, "separation from other women is the price a woman pays for her exceptionalness" while she is "managed, contained and controlled" in order to prevent the exception from becoming the rule (Exceptional Woman 2-3). Although Sheriff explores the ways in which the exceptional woman "contained subversive potential" ("So What Are You" 49), the exceptional woman's singularity is nonetheless always part of the equation. In a departure from the paradigms established at the end of the eighteenth century, a significant number of women in the nineteenth century embraced the ideal of sisterhood as an important component of female artistic identity and advancement. This communal ideal became a popular trope in British women's fiction (see, for example, Auerbach; Marcus; Rogers), and at the same time, the very word sisterhood resonated not only with familial overtones1 but also with religious ones closely tied to charitable and reform work through the Anglican and Catholic churches.2 In this latter sense, sisterhood became associated both with communal labour and with female spiritual community, and, as Dinah Craik reflected in her essay "On Sisterhood" (on a friend's becoming an Anglican sister), "entering a Sisterhood, almost any sort of Sisterhood where there was work to do, authority to compel the doing of it, and companionship to sweeten the same, would have saved many a woman from a lunatic asylum" [End Page 129] (55). Martha Vicinus notes that the religious sisterhoods "were clearly in the vanguard of women's single-sex organizations" at mid-century and "offered examples of fully trained and educated single women dedicated to nursing, teaching, and good works. They also demonstrated the greater effectiveness of women working in organized groups" (48, 46). Accordingly, sisterhoods set the stage for a growing demand for expanded educational opportunities for women and signalled the powerful potential of female collective engagement in the social (and by extension the political) realm. For Anna Mary Howitt and her cohort of self-proclaimed "sisters in art," the politics and poetics of sisterhood were further shaped by the contemporaneous Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, which served as both an inspiration and a symbol of exclusion. Loosely affiliated with the group both as a painter and as a writer, Howitt maintained a long-term friendship with D.G. Rossetti, and, as a casual but affectionate drawing from 1852 attests, Rossetti appreciated Anna Mary's passionate intensity. Like the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, Howitt and her friends embraced the desire for a socially engaged art, the belief in the strong connection between work and identity, a spiritual impetus for art, and a commitment to collaboration. Thematically and stylistically, the paintings and poems of the art sisterhood reflected an undeniably Pre-Raphaelite aesthetic, yet despite these intersections and their participation in some of the group's activities,3 women were never considered members of the fraternity. As Jason Rosenfeld has documented, the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was "an insistently patriarchal construction" (72), and like the fraternal associations of the period (trade guilds, compagnonnages, Masonic orders, Gesellenverbande), the artistic brotherhood was...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,975
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,228

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetTravel Writing and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207