MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010229032 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2010.0005

The Politics and Poetics of Sisterhood: Anna Mary Howitt's The Sisters in Art

2010· article· en· W2010229032 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alexandra K. Wettlaufer

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsPoliticsIdentity (music)Order (exchange)PaintingArtArt historySociologyAestheticsLiteratureGender studiesLawPoetryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Politics and Poetics of Sisterhood:Anna Mary Howitt's The Sisters in Art Alexandra Wettlaufer (bio) The emergence of the professional female painter during the Victorian period was notably tied to political as well as economic and aesthetic concerns. As Deborah Cherry reminds us, art "became a battleground for intense debates about the role of women in contemporary society" when the 1840s and 1850s produced a number of young women who became both "artists and activists" (Beyond the Frame 11). As women entered the field of cultural production in unprecedented numbers during the Victorian era, many self-consciously constructed an artistic identity that engaged with larger issues of representation, gender, labour, education, and collectivity. Striking in these works of the 1840s to the 1860s is the common desire to shift away from the idea of the "exceptional woman" as artist—embodied in Mme de Staël's fictitious Corinne and the real-life careers of eighteenth-century painters Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun and Angelica Kauffman—and to forge a definition of art that could encompass all women—not just singular and exceptional women—in its norms and hierarchies. For, as Mary Sheriff so eloquently demonstrates, "separation from other women is the price a woman pays for her exceptionalness" while she is "managed, contained and controlled" in order to prevent the exception from becoming the rule (Exceptional Woman 2-3). Although Sheriff explores the ways in which the exceptional woman "contained subversive potential" ("So What Are You" 49), the exceptional woman's singularity is nonetheless always part of the equation. In a departure from the paradigms established at the end of the eighteenth century, a significant number of women in the nineteenth century embraced the ideal of sisterhood as an important component of female artistic identity and advancement. This communal ideal became a popular trope in British women's fiction (see, for example, Auerbach; Marcus; Rogers), and at the same time, the very word sisterhood resonated not only with familial overtones1 but also with religious ones closely tied to charitable and reform work through the Anglican and Catholic churches.2 In this latter sense, sisterhood became associated both with communal labour and with female spiritual community, and, as Dinah Craik reflected in her essay "On Sisterhood" (on a friend's becoming an Anglican sister), "entering a Sisterhood, almost any sort of Sisterhood where there was work to do, authority to compel the doing of it, and companionship to sweeten the same, would have saved many a woman from a lunatic asylum" [End Page 129] (55). Martha Vicinus notes that the religious sisterhoods "were clearly in the vanguard of women's single-sex organizations" at mid-century and "offered examples of fully trained and educated single women dedicated to nursing, teaching, and good works. They also demonstrated the greater effectiveness of women working in organized groups" (48, 46). Accordingly, sisterhoods set the stage for a growing demand for expanded educational opportunities for women and signalled the powerful potential of female collective engagement in the social (and by extension the political) realm. For Anna Mary Howitt and her cohort of self-proclaimed "sisters in art," the politics and poetics of sisterhood were further shaped by the contemporaneous Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, which served as both an inspiration and a symbol of exclusion. Loosely affiliated with the group both as a painter and as a writer, Howitt maintained a long-term friendship with D.G. Rossetti, and, as a casual but affectionate drawing from 1852 attests, Rossetti appreciated Anna Mary's passionate intensity. Like the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, Howitt and her friends embraced the desire for a socially engaged art, the belief in the strong connection between work and identity, a spiritual impetus for art, and a commitment to collaboration. Thematically and stylistically, the paintings and poems of the art sisterhood reflected an undeniably Pre-Raphaelite aesthetic, yet despite these intersections and their participation in some of the group's activities,3 women were never considered members of the fraternity. As Jason Rosenfeld has documented, the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was "an insistently patriarchal construction" (72), and like the fraternal associations of the period (trade guilds, compagnonnages, Masonic orders, Gesellenverbande), the artistic brotherhood was...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207