Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dancing in the Dark: Tu vois ce que je veux dire? Natalie Rewa (bio) Tu vois ce que je veux dire?, which was featured during the Festival TransAmériques in Montreal in May 2010, is a time-based de´rive (peregrination). It partners two complete strangers: one a volunteer signed on by the producers, and the other a ticket-buyer. Before they meet, the ticket-buying partner is blindfolded. Together they will negotiate an urban landscape and some of its interior spaces. The present writer was one of the blindfolded ticket-buyers, hence the point of view. The first edition of this "urban odyssey" in 2005 was a co-production by Projet in situ in association with three diverse organizations: The´aˆtre Le Merlan, Lieux Publics (an urban theatre company), and the National Institute for the Blind in Marseille. Three years later it was a contribution to the Biennale de danse in Lyon. The artistic directors of the walk are dancer Martin Chaput (originally from Montreal) and choreographer and anthropologist Martial Chazallon, whose company regularly collaborates with dancers, photographers, and visual and installation artists in France and South Africa. For a decade Chazallon has also been rechoreographing urban environments so as to interrupt the habits of the social and historical body. Such walks engage local sites and local artists as part of a kinesthetic lab, the emphasis being on the physicality of movement rather than descriptive touring. The experience is an active immersion in a kind of acoustic and tactile scenography. The title is playfully ambiguous because what you are told is very minimal and what you "see" in the mind's eye is immensely more than what is told. The seeing partner is under instructions not to describe, identify or confirm the assumptions, suppositions or guesses of the blindfolded one, except to warn about approaching hazards such as curbs and steps. Initially, the walk is a trust exercise in which the ticket-buying participant's own urban gait and habits of walking are adapted under seeing guidance. Chaput and Chazallon allow for both the heightened acoustic and other sensorial impressions engendered by the blindfold to take hold before the visits to various interior spatial and social environments begin. These will culminate in a final dance in a large gymnasium about two and half hours later. During the walk, generalized aural attention to street sounds is alternated with visits to defined spaces such as a cafe´, a yoga studio, a graphic exhibit, a church, and its internal ritual spaces including a confessional and a music lesson—a different selection for each ticket-holder. In Montreal the walk started from the second storey Long Haul/Le Corrid'art, a not-for-profit artist's space that otherwise serves as a hub for visual artists. Departures for the walk were timed so that there were only two or three ticket-holders in the gallery at any one time, and the briefings were simultaneous with a blindfold fitting. Click for larger view View full resolution The three-hour walk had a real vibrancy about it for each member of the couple; for the guides, showing the city provided a new perspective. Click for larger view View full resolution A volunteer guides the blindfolded walker and each walker is encouraged to take refreshment en route. Photo by Juan Saez My guide, Louise, was introduced. Her left elbow was my point of contact. Up to this point Tu vois ce que je veux dire? was like any number of trust walks used in workshops; the first five minutes of the walk were taken up with a careful descent to the street, down a circular staircase and to the sidewalk. On the street the guide fell silent and my pace became the measure for the walk. Tu vois ce que je veux dire? insists on the participant being immersed in the city and becoming a spectacle while being deprived of sight herself. Initially the walk appears to have absorbed the city—the sidewalks, the textures of fencing or railing, the construction materials of the buildings, and the public fountains and benches—but soon modulates into a complex sense of one's [End Page 121] presence...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,036 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».