MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011013948 · doi:10.1353/ctr.2011.0061

Dancing in the Dark: Tu vois ce que je veux dire?

2011· article· fr· W2011013948 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Natalie Rewa

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTicketVisual artsArtDancePerformance artArt historyMedia studiesHumanitiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dancing in the Dark: Tu vois ce que je veux dire? Natalie Rewa (bio) Tu vois ce que je veux dire?, which was featured during the Festival TransAmériques in Montreal in May 2010, is a time-based de´rive (peregrination). It partners two complete strangers: one a volunteer signed on by the producers, and the other a ticket-buyer. Before they meet, the ticket-buying partner is blindfolded. Together they will negotiate an urban landscape and some of its interior spaces. The present writer was one of the blindfolded ticket-buyers, hence the point of view. The first edition of this "urban odyssey" in 2005 was a co-production by Projet in situ in association with three diverse organizations: The´aˆtre Le Merlan, Lieux Publics (an urban theatre company), and the National Institute for the Blind in Marseille. Three years later it was a contribution to the Biennale de danse in Lyon. The artistic directors of the walk are dancer Martin Chaput (originally from Montreal) and choreographer and anthropologist Martial Chazallon, whose company regularly collaborates with dancers, photographers, and visual and installation artists in France and South Africa. For a decade Chazallon has also been rechoreographing urban environments so as to interrupt the habits of the social and historical body. Such walks engage local sites and local artists as part of a kinesthetic lab, the emphasis being on the physicality of movement rather than descriptive touring. The experience is an active immersion in a kind of acoustic and tactile scenography. The title is playfully ambiguous because what you are told is very minimal and what you "see" in the mind's eye is immensely more than what is told. The seeing partner is under instructions not to describe, identify or confirm the assumptions, suppositions or guesses of the blindfolded one, except to warn about approaching hazards such as curbs and steps. Initially, the walk is a trust exercise in which the ticket-buying participant's own urban gait and habits of walking are adapted under seeing guidance. Chaput and Chazallon allow for both the heightened acoustic and other sensorial impressions engendered by the blindfold to take hold before the visits to various interior spatial and social environments begin. These will culminate in a final dance in a large gymnasium about two and half hours later. During the walk, generalized aural attention to street sounds is alternated with visits to defined spaces such as a cafe´, a yoga studio, a graphic exhibit, a church, and its internal ritual spaces including a confessional and a music lesson—a different selection for each ticket-holder. In Montreal the walk started from the second storey Long Haul/Le Corrid'art, a not-for-profit artist's space that otherwise serves as a hub for visual artists. Departures for the walk were timed so that there were only two or three ticket-holders in the gallery at any one time, and the briefings were simultaneous with a blindfold fitting. Click for larger view View full resolution The three-hour walk had a real vibrancy about it for each member of the couple; for the guides, showing the city provided a new perspective. Click for larger view View full resolution A volunteer guides the blindfolded walker and each walker is encouraged to take refreshment en route. Photo by Juan Saez My guide, Louise, was introduced. Her left elbow was my point of contact. Up to this point Tu vois ce que je veux dire? was like any number of trust walks used in workshops; the first five minutes of the walk were taken up with a careful descent to the street, down a circular staircase and to the sidewalk. On the street the guide fell silent and my pace became the measure for the walk. Tu vois ce que je veux dire? insists on the participant being immersed in the city and becoming a spectacle while being deprived of sight herself. Initially the walk appears to have absorbed the city—the sidewalks, the textures of fencing or railing, the construction materials of the buildings, and the public fountains and benches—but soon modulates into a complex sense of one's [End Page 121] presence...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207