Towards a framework for increasing help-seeking for social anxiety disorder
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Social anxiety disorder (SAnD) is a condition in which the individual experiences persistent, excessive fear in social and performance situations, leading to their avoidance, or intense distress and impaired role functioning, including social, educational and occupational, and routine functioning (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Estimates of the prevalence of social phobia vary markedly (Fehm et al., 2005; Furmark, 2002; Somers et al., 2006). However, the condition is clearly common in many western countries, with nationally representative samples yielding Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) lifetime and 12-month prevalences of 8.7% (McEvoy et al., 2011) and 4.7%, respectively, in Australia (Slade et al., 2009), 7.8% and 4.8% in The Netherlands (Bijl et al., 1998) and 12.1% (Kessler et al., 2005a) and 6.8% (Kessler et al., 2005b) in the USA. SAnD is one of the most prevalent of the anxiety disorders (Bijl et al., 1998; Kessler et al., 2005b; McEvoy et al., 2011). \n \nSAnD typically emerges in childhood or adolescence with a reported median age of onset of 13 years in Australia (McEvoy et al., 2011) and 16 years in the USA (Magee et al., 1996). The condition involves a chronic course with a mean duration of at least 20 years (Canadian Psychiatric Association, 2006) and a high rate of comorbidity with other mental disorders (Furmark, 2002). It is more prevalent in women than men (Furmark, 2002; McEvoy et al., 2011; Somers et al., 2006). SAnD exerts a profound, negative impact on quality of life, is a significant risk factor for the development of major depressive disorder, and is associated with substance misuse (Stein and Stein, 2008) and increased levels of suicidality, even in the absence of comorbid depression (Fehm et al., 2005). SAnD is also associated with significant societal costs; for example, one study reported that 22% of SAnD participants were on disability or welfare benefits compared to 10% of controls (Furmark, 2002). At an individual level, the severity of disability associated with pure SAnD is as high as that associated with pure depression (Fehm et al., 2005). For example, the work loss index for SAnD adjusted for comorbidity is the same as for affective disorder and exceeds that for significant physical illness such as diabetes and heart disease (Alonso et al., 2004). Sub-threshold social anxiety is also associated with substantial disability, leading some researchers to propose the use of a dimensional rather than a categorical approach to the assessment of the condition (Filho et al., 2010). \n \nDespite the distressing nature of SAnD, the availability of effective psychopharmacological and psychological treatments for the condition, and its unremitting nature if left untreated, only a minority of individuals with SAnD seek professional treatment (Grant et al., 2005; Magee et al., 1996; Ormel et al., 2008; Schneier et al., 1992). Across the nine high-income countries sampled in the World Mental Health Survey, only 20.8% of individuals with SAnD reported seeking professional help (Ormel et al., 2008). Moreover, it has been reported that only 7% of people with SAnD receive ‘notionally effective treatment’ (Andrews et al., 2004). It has been calculated that with 70% and 100% coverage using optimal current treatments for SAnD, this currently very low level of disability prevention could be increased to 34% and 49%, respectively (Andrews et al., 2004). Thus, there is a clear need to promote help-seeking and access to evidence-based treatments among individuals with SAnD. However, to date, SAnD has been relegated to the role of Cinderella compared to depressive disorders, with public awareness campaigns focused almost exclusively on promoting help-seeking for depression.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».