Canada's Competitive Regulatory Framework - Atlantic Canada Perspective
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Using Experience. Since November 2003, industry, governments and regulators have been fully engaged in a project to identify opportunities for improvement in the regulatory systems governing oil and gas activities offshore Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia. The first wave of change, now completed, used recent experience to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of regulatory processes. The second step, now underway, involves renewal of the regulations with an objective of introducing more performance based or "goal oriented" criteria, where applicable, enabling efficient adaptation of new technologies and industry best practices. Working Collaboratively. There is no "one size" fits all when it comes to regulating offshore oil and gas activities. Some regimes consolidate the gateway to these interests through a single agency, while others require industry to address some of them directly with the responsible departments. Regardless of whether the interests are consolidated or addressed directly, the tensions among them remain. In Canada, we are using our own experience and lessons learned from others to bring multiple government and industry players to the table and align interests collaboratively. The Multiple Public Interests in the Offshore. The marine environment represents a significant challenge for governments because of the multiplicity of ocean interests. In general terms, the interests and issues that must be considered by offshore regulators and policy-makers include the following:Health and safety of workers - the primary challenge is to create regimes that ensure safety is not compromised. Within this challenge is the need to mesh land-based Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) experience with offshore OHS experience.Co-existence with other marine uses - the issue is primarily fishing and the degree of complexity depends upon the robustness of the fishing industry, gear types and proximity to exploration and development.Environmental interests - including the need to comply with national and International standards and agreements; waste disposal (drilling fluids, cuttings, produced water) in the marine environment; cumulative effects; oceans management regimes including Marine Protected Areas; seismic sound regulation and protecting marine species.Co-existence with other marine laws - brings into focus the regulation of other shipping interests and regulation for specialized offshore vessels such as mobile drilling units. The issue of marine security is also a significant one for the offshore in the post 9-11 environment.Economic Interests - cover the remaining significant area for regulatory challenge in the offshore. The interests include: local business development, capabilities and expectations as well as taxation, duties, and trade rules. Atlantic Canada Context and Background Canada - a federation. The fact that Canada is a federation is at times a strength and at others a challenge. Responsibility and jurisdiction for many matters is often not divided but instead is shared. As a result, although accountability is often shared as well, it also means the outcome is often a blend of national and provincial interests, which makes for more stable and enduring outcomes. In the case of Atlantic Canada's offshore oil and gas activities, political Accords were signed in the mid-eighties to merge provincial and federal offshore responsibilities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».