Canada's Competitive Regulatory Framework - Atlantic Canada Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Using Experience. Since November 2003, industry, governments and regulators have been fully engaged in a project to identify opportunities for improvement in the regulatory systems governing oil and gas activities offshore Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia. The first wave of change, now completed, used recent experience to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of regulatory processes. The second step, now underway, involves renewal of the regulations with an objective of introducing more performance based or "goal oriented" criteria, where applicable, enabling efficient adaptation of new technologies and industry best practices. Working Collaboratively. There is no "one size" fits all when it comes to regulating offshore oil and gas activities. Some regimes consolidate the gateway to these interests through a single agency, while others require industry to address some of them directly with the responsible departments. Regardless of whether the interests are consolidated or addressed directly, the tensions among them remain. In Canada, we are using our own experience and lessons learned from others to bring multiple government and industry players to the table and align interests collaboratively. The Multiple Public Interests in the Offshore. The marine environment represents a significant challenge for governments because of the multiplicity of ocean interests. In general terms, the interests and issues that must be considered by offshore regulators and policy-makers include the following:Health and safety of workers - the primary challenge is to create regimes that ensure safety is not compromised. Within this challenge is the need to mesh land-based Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) experience with offshore OHS experience.Co-existence with other marine uses - the issue is primarily fishing and the degree of complexity depends upon the robustness of the fishing industry, gear types and proximity to exploration and development.Environmental interests - including the need to comply with national and International standards and agreements; waste disposal (drilling fluids, cuttings, produced water) in the marine environment; cumulative effects; oceans management regimes including Marine Protected Areas; seismic sound regulation and protecting marine species.Co-existence with other marine laws - brings into focus the regulation of other shipping interests and regulation for specialized offshore vessels such as mobile drilling units. The issue of marine security is also a significant one for the offshore in the post 9-11 environment.Economic Interests - cover the remaining significant area for regulatory challenge in the offshore. The interests include: local business development, capabilities and expectations as well as taxation, duties, and trade rules. Atlantic Canada Context and Background Canada - a federation. The fact that Canada is a federation is at times a strength and at others a challenge. Responsibility and jurisdiction for many matters is often not divided but instead is shared. As a result, although accountability is often shared as well, it also means the outcome is often a blend of national and provincial interests, which makes for more stable and enduring outcomes. In the case of Atlantic Canada's offshore oil and gas activities, political Accords were signed in the mid-eighties to merge provincial and federal offshore responsibilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".