The Making of a Revolutionary Icon: Vera Nikolaevna Figner and the People’s Will in the Wake of the Assassination of Tsar Aleksandr II
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A few minutes after two o'clock in the afternoon on 1 March 1881 (O.S.), the carriage of Tsar Aleksandr II traveled briskly along the Ekaterinskii canal in St. Petersburg. As the Imperial procession made its way along the snow-covered streets of the capital, the Emperor was in unusually high spirits.1 Just the day before he had learned that gendarmes had arrested the major revolutionary conspirator, Andrei Zheliabov.2 In August of 1879, Zheliabov and his narodovol'tsy comrades in the People's Will had formally condemned the Tsar to death in the hopes that Aleksandr II's assassination would precipitate a political and social revolution.3 Over the subsequent year and a half, the members of this revolutionary party repeatedly attempted to impose this sentence. Though each endeavor ended in failure, the members of this radical group came dangerously close on a number of occasions. In the weeks preceding 1 March, Aleksandr II and the Minister of Internal Affairs, Count Mikhail Loris-- Melikov, had been particularly concerned about an imminent danger to the Tsar.4 Consequently, the news of Zheliabov's arrest was especially welcome and quieted the pronounced fears of the Tsar's inner circle.5 With the terrorist leader in custody, the Tsar felt comfortable continuing his regular Sunday review of the troops at the Mikhailovskii Riding School. Thus, Aleksandr II set off as usual from the Winter Palace on this gray, frosty, Sunday afternoon. His decision to do so proved a fatal mistake. Frustrated by recent arrests and potential setbacks, the Executive Committee of the People's Will resolved that 1 March 1881 would be the day that Aleksandr II's death sentence was finally imposed. Unbeknownst to the Tsar and his ministers, the capture of Zheliabov actually heightened the danger to the Sovereign. Afraid that the decimation of their group was imminent, the leaders of the People's Will resolved to assassinate Aleksandr II without delay, regardless of the cost. For weeks, the revolutionaries' plans to murder the Emperor centered on Malaia Sadovaia Street, a thoroughfare which the Tsar regularly traveled en route to the Mikhailovskii Riding School. With two of their members posing as married merchants, the People's Will leadership let a cheese shop on Malaia Sadovaia Street, tunneled underground and prepared to lay a mine beneath the pavement. When Zheliabov, the driving force behind this plan was arrested on 27 February, the mine was not yet in place. Knowing that Aleksandr II was likely to pass the cheese shop on the morning of I March, the narodovol'tsy hurriedly readied their violent preparations. Throughout the night of 28 February/1 March, while one set of terrorists laid the mine under Malaia Sadovaia Street, several others6 gathered in the apartment of narodovol'tsy leader Vera Nikolaevna Figner and carefully prepared bombs which could be thrown by hand in case the underground mine failed. These contingency arrangements proved decisive. On the afternoon of 1 March, Aleksandr II eschewed the bustling, public route to the Riding School via Nevskii Prospect and Malaia Sadovaia Street, and opted to travel the more open Ekaterinskii Canal and Italianskaia Street where a would-be assassin would have less cover.7 This route variation rendered the narodovol'tsy's underground mine useless, but it did not foil the terrorists. For months they had shadowed the Tsar and noted his routines. The revolutionaries knew that Aleksandr II might follow the Ekaterinskii Canal en route to review the troops at the Riding School.8 Consequently, four revolutionaries equipped with the recently constructed hand-held bombs manned the Ekaterinskii Canal.9 After the review of the troops and a short visit with his cousin, the Grand Duchess Ekaterina Mikhailovna,10 Aleksandr II's cavalcade turned back onto the Ekaterinskii Canal just after two o'clock. Seeing that the Emperor was returning to the Winter Palace via the same course he had taken earlier in the day, Executive Committee member Sofia Perovskaia gave a pre-determined signal to the bomb-throwers to get ready to act. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».