The Making of a Revolutionary Icon: Vera Nikolaevna Figner and the People’s Will in the Wake of the Assassination of Tsar Aleksandr II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A few minutes after two o'clock in the afternoon on 1 March 1881 (O.S.), the carriage of Tsar Aleksandr II traveled briskly along the Ekaterinskii canal in St. Petersburg. As the Imperial procession made its way along the snow-covered streets of the capital, the Emperor was in unusually high spirits.1 Just the day before he had learned that gendarmes had arrested the major revolutionary conspirator, Andrei Zheliabov.2 In August of 1879, Zheliabov and his narodovol'tsy comrades in the People's Will had formally condemned the Tsar to death in the hopes that Aleksandr II's assassination would precipitate a political and social revolution.3 Over the subsequent year and a half, the members of this revolutionary party repeatedly attempted to impose this sentence. Though each endeavor ended in failure, the members of this radical group came dangerously close on a number of occasions. In the weeks preceding 1 March, Aleksandr II and the Minister of Internal Affairs, Count Mikhail Loris-- Melikov, had been particularly concerned about an imminent danger to the Tsar.4 Consequently, the news of Zheliabov's arrest was especially welcome and quieted the pronounced fears of the Tsar's inner circle.5 With the terrorist leader in custody, the Tsar felt comfortable continuing his regular Sunday review of the troops at the Mikhailovskii Riding School. Thus, Aleksandr II set off as usual from the Winter Palace on this gray, frosty, Sunday afternoon. His decision to do so proved a fatal mistake. Frustrated by recent arrests and potential setbacks, the Executive Committee of the People's Will resolved that 1 March 1881 would be the day that Aleksandr II's death sentence was finally imposed. Unbeknownst to the Tsar and his ministers, the capture of Zheliabov actually heightened the danger to the Sovereign. Afraid that the decimation of their group was imminent, the leaders of the People's Will resolved to assassinate Aleksandr II without delay, regardless of the cost. For weeks, the revolutionaries' plans to murder the Emperor centered on Malaia Sadovaia Street, a thoroughfare which the Tsar regularly traveled en route to the Mikhailovskii Riding School. With two of their members posing as married merchants, the People's Will leadership let a cheese shop on Malaia Sadovaia Street, tunneled underground and prepared to lay a mine beneath the pavement. When Zheliabov, the driving force behind this plan was arrested on 27 February, the mine was not yet in place. Knowing that Aleksandr II was likely to pass the cheese shop on the morning of I March, the narodovol'tsy hurriedly readied their violent preparations. Throughout the night of 28 February/1 March, while one set of terrorists laid the mine under Malaia Sadovaia Street, several others6 gathered in the apartment of narodovol'tsy leader Vera Nikolaevna Figner and carefully prepared bombs which could be thrown by hand in case the underground mine failed. These contingency arrangements proved decisive. On the afternoon of 1 March, Aleksandr II eschewed the bustling, public route to the Riding School via Nevskii Prospect and Malaia Sadovaia Street, and opted to travel the more open Ekaterinskii Canal and Italianskaia Street where a would-be assassin would have less cover.7 This route variation rendered the narodovol'tsy's underground mine useless, but it did not foil the terrorists. For months they had shadowed the Tsar and noted his routines. The revolutionaries knew that Aleksandr II might follow the Ekaterinskii Canal en route to review the troops at the Riding School.8 Consequently, four revolutionaries equipped with the recently constructed hand-held bombs manned the Ekaterinskii Canal.9 After the review of the troops and a short visit with his cousin, the Grand Duchess Ekaterina Mikhailovna,10 Aleksandr II's cavalcade turned back onto the Ekaterinskii Canal just after two o'clock. Seeing that the Emperor was returning to the Winter Palace via the same course he had taken earlier in the day, Executive Committee member Sofia Perovskaia gave a pre-determined signal to the bomb-throwers to get ready to act. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".