MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2016433733 · doi:10.1177/002070200906400403

Seeking a Strategic Vision for Canada-China Relations

2009· article· en· W2016433733 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wenran Jiang

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Policy and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSuperpowerChinaForeign policyBeijingModernization theoryPolitical scienceGeneral partnershipGovernment (linguistics)International relationsPolitical economySociologyPoliticsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In celebrating the 25th anniversary ofthe establishment ofthe Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, a key task is to reflect critically on Canada-China relations. As a rising global superpower and Canada's second-largest trading partner, China is rapidly becoming one ofthe most important countries for Canadian foreign policy. Canada's relations with China have undergone memorable and significant developments in recent decades. Ottawa opened trade with China in the early 1960s by selling it wheat, a scarce commodity in the world's most populated country, which at the time was experiencing famine on a massive scale. In 1970, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau established diplomatic relations with the People's Republic - ahead of most other western countries. The two countries have enjoyed steady improvements in bilateral ties over much ofthe past 40 years.Until the Conservatives came to power in early 2006 under the leadership of Stephen Harper, Canada's China policy was rather consistent and nonpartisan. This was the case under various Liberal governments and during the years when the Conservative government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was in office. Beijing had also viewed Canada as a friendly western power and, in recent years, increasingly as a potential market for China's dynamic modernization program. Chinese President Hu Jintao's visit to Canada in the autumn of 2005 marked a new height in bilateral ties. Both countries agreed to elevate their bilateral relations to a strategic partnership, a term that Beijing uses to define key close relations with countries around the world.But after the Conservatives took office in early 2006, Harper made unannounced and yet obvious changes to Canada's China policy. Ottawa stopped using the term strategic partnership to describe bilateral relations and removed China from the priority list of Canadian foreign policy. Harper has yet to visit China after three-and-a-half years in office.Nevertheless, there are also signs that the Conservative government is making major readjustments to its China file. Four federal ministers - of international trade, transport and infrastructure, foreign affairs, and finance - visited China over a four-month span this year, apparently to prepare the groundwork for Harper's visit to Beijing this fall. With such timing in mind, this article will review the rise of China as a global power and its implications for Canada, evaluate critical issues in Canada-China relations, and, finally, offer policy recommendations for a nonpartisan China policy.THE RISE OF CHINA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CANADAWhen the Asia Pacific Foundation was created a quarter of a century ago, China was just beginning its reform and open-door policy. China's story since then has been one of explosive economic growth and integration with the world. During this process, the state has changed from an ideologically driven communist apparatus into a market-oriented one. China today is the third-largest world economy, the second-largest trading nation, and the largest holder of foreign reserves. Beijing has become the largest debt holder of the United States, using much of its foreign earnings to purchase US treasury and other bonds and financing the US deficit economy. It also attracts the largest amount of foreign direct investment among the developing countries.All of this was driven by the Communist party of China and its push to modernize industry, agriculture, science and technology, and defence. Through a very competitive, cutthroat market economy, China has become deeply integrated into the world economy. China has the largest goods-andservices-to-GDP ratio among the major economies, much larger than that of Japan, South Korea, or other southeast Asian economies, with the exception of Singapore. This trend has accelerated since China entered the World Trade Organization in 2001.On the sociological level, however, China's growth story has also been about a very strong desire by ordinary Chinese to have a better life. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,844
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,333
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisMême sujetCanadian Policy and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207