MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2016433733 · doi:10.1177/002070200906400403

Seeking a Strategic Vision for Canada-China Relations

2009· article· en· W2016433733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wenran Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperpowerChinaForeign policyBeijingModernization theoryPolitical scienceGeneral partnershipGovernment (linguistics)International relationsPolitical economySociologyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In celebrating the 25th anniversary ofthe establishment ofthe Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, a key task is to reflect critically on Canada-China relations. As a rising global superpower and Canada's second-largest trading partner, China is rapidly becoming one ofthe most important countries for Canadian foreign policy. Canada's relations with China have undergone memorable and significant developments in recent decades. Ottawa opened trade with China in the early 1960s by selling it wheat, a scarce commodity in the world's most populated country, which at the time was experiencing famine on a massive scale. In 1970, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau established diplomatic relations with the People's Republic - ahead of most other western countries. The two countries have enjoyed steady improvements in bilateral ties over much ofthe past 40 years.Until the Conservatives came to power in early 2006 under the leadership of Stephen Harper, Canada's China policy was rather consistent and nonpartisan. This was the case under various Liberal governments and during the years when the Conservative government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was in office. Beijing had also viewed Canada as a friendly western power and, in recent years, increasingly as a potential market for China's dynamic modernization program. Chinese President Hu Jintao's visit to Canada in the autumn of 2005 marked a new height in bilateral ties. Both countries agreed to elevate their bilateral relations to a strategic partnership, a term that Beijing uses to define key close relations with countries around the world.But after the Conservatives took office in early 2006, Harper made unannounced and yet obvious changes to Canada's China policy. Ottawa stopped using the term strategic partnership to describe bilateral relations and removed China from the priority list of Canadian foreign policy. Harper has yet to visit China after three-and-a-half years in office.Nevertheless, there are also signs that the Conservative government is making major readjustments to its China file. Four federal ministers - of international trade, transport and infrastructure, foreign affairs, and finance - visited China over a four-month span this year, apparently to prepare the groundwork for Harper's visit to Beijing this fall. With such timing in mind, this article will review the rise of China as a global power and its implications for Canada, evaluate critical issues in Canada-China relations, and, finally, offer policy recommendations for a nonpartisan China policy.THE RISE OF CHINA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CANADAWhen the Asia Pacific Foundation was created a quarter of a century ago, China was just beginning its reform and open-door policy. China's story since then has been one of explosive economic growth and integration with the world. During this process, the state has changed from an ideologically driven communist apparatus into a market-oriented one. China today is the third-largest world economy, the second-largest trading nation, and the largest holder of foreign reserves. Beijing has become the largest debt holder of the United States, using much of its foreign earnings to purchase US treasury and other bonds and financing the US deficit economy. It also attracts the largest amount of foreign direct investment among the developing countries.All of this was driven by the Communist party of China and its push to modernize industry, agriculture, science and technology, and defence. Through a very competitive, cutthroat market economy, China has become deeply integrated into the world economy. China has the largest goods-andservices-to-GDP ratio among the major economies, much larger than that of Japan, South Korea, or other southeast Asian economies, with the exception of Singapore. This trend has accelerated since China entered the World Trade Organization in 2001.On the sociological level, however, China's growth story has also been about a very strong desire by ordinary Chinese to have a better life. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207