In Quest of Fur: The Travel Journal of William O.K. Ross, 1909 (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: In Quest of Fur: The Travel Journal of William O.K. Ross, 1909 Anne Morton (bio) Philip E.L. Smith, editor. In Quest of Fur: The Travel Journal of William O.K. Ross, 1909 Creative. xii, 176. $14.95 This book is an edition of a diary in the possession of Montreal's McCord Museum. The editor was able to identify its author, William Oliver Kennedy Ross, through research in the daily journals of the Hudson's Bay Company post at Mingan. Ross (1864-1942) was a native of Quebec City of Irish descent. In the spring of 1909 as a fur buyer for Holt Renfrew he [End Page 545] travelled along the North Shore of the St Lawrence from Quebec City to Labrador and then by boat across the Strait of Belle Isle to Newfoundland. Why Ross kept the diary (and whether he kept other diaries, now lost) is a matter of speculation. Perhaps, as he was away from his family from mid-March to mid-June, able to communicate only by the occasional telegram, he wanted to use the diary as a help in talking about his trip. He may also have been aware that travelling with dogs and kometik 'down the Labrador coast' was likely to be an adventurous experience and one that might give him pleasure to look back on later in life. Almost a century later, Ross's diary is certainly worth reading by those interested in the fur trade and/or the region of Canada he visited. Travelling fur buyers are not well documented. In fact, the main source of documentation on them is the records of the Hudson's Bay Company, in which the comments are never lengthy and rarely sympathetic. The edition of Ross's diary thus fills a gap. His detailed accounts of his dogs and the vicissitudes of travelling with them are of special interest. The hair-raising descriptions of getting down steep hills are particularly fine. While Ross's descriptions of people are often brief, he was sometimes moved to write more. He was evidently touched by the fortitude of a five-year-old boy who had to walk over twelve miles in the soft snow of spring to bring aid to his brother, only two years older, who had been caught in a fox trap. Ross describes the child as 'poorly clad, short pants all torn, socks fell down over boots leaving the legs bare, and no mitts, no scarf, and little coat flying open.' Reading a diary can bring to life the world it describes and in which it was created. We need the editor's help, however, to set the diary in context. Philip E.L. Smith has been very diligent in amassing facts; the introduction and the endnotes occupy almost four times as many pages as the diary itself. Ross apparently never encountered a telegraph operator or Anglican lay reader on whom Smith was not able to dig up at least some biographical information. Yet we do not need to know everything Smith was able to find. His research runs the risk of smothering the diary rather than illuminating it. To some extent this is because so much is crammed into the back of the book. It might have been more helpful to intersperse the text of the diary with introductions to each community Ross visited or to each portion of his journey. The introduction contains a great deal of information on Ross himself. As most readers will be more interested in what the diary is about than they will in its author, these biographical details could have been presented in a more streamlined fashion. More background on the fur trade at the beginning of the last century, and on disease among sled dogs (a major source of anxiety to Ross), would have been useful, as would material on the practice of diary keeping. [End Page 546] Though this book, like Ross's journey, could have been easier going, it is still a valuable source on life and the fur trade in a remote part of Canada more than a century ago. We owe thanks to Smith and to his publishers for making...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».