MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2021368496 · doi:10.1353/gpr.2014.0032

Herbert Has Lots for a Buck: How 12 Small Prairie Towns Reinvented Themselves for the 21st Century by Elizabeth McLachlan (review)

2014· article· en· W2021368496 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Murray Knuttila

Notice bibliographique

RevueGreat Plains research · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueRural development and sustainability
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Herbert Has Lots for a Buck: How 12 Small Prairie Towns Reinvented Themselves for the 21st Century by Elizabeth McLachlan Murray Knuttila Herbert Has Lots for a Buck: How 12 Small Prairie Towns Reinvented Themselves for the 21st Century. By Elizabeth McLachlan. Edmonton ab: NeWest Press, 2012. 227 pp. $19.95 paper. The small town seems to be a form of social organization endemic to the human condition, nowhere more so than on the North American Plains. Elizabeth McLachlan’s latest chronicle of life in western Canada addresses an important issue that many small towns face—survival in the face of a changing socioeconomic, political, and cultural global world. McLachlan narrates twelve stories of towns in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba that have avoided extinction because they, as the cover states, “reinvented themselves for the twenty-first century.” Virtually every chapter begins with some historical data about the community, followed by depressing portrayals of towns in decline before reinvention. She describes institutional closures and population loss, placing one town on the “verge of disintegration” (111), with “paint peeling or gone, their windows veiled with decades of grime” (23) or more graphically: “Empty storefronts pock the wide main street. A forsaken church has cracked and broken windows” (186). The theme of the book, however, is reinvention and how communities moved away from oblivion. The stories are as varied as the communities—their location, history, options and potentials, and their creativity and determination. Herschel (sk) discovered archeology and pre-Contact history, while Big Valley (ab) focused on the recent history of coal and railroads, making steam train rides and reenactments possible. Rosebud (ab) turned tragedy into hope and renewal with an arts school. The Mennonite traditions of Neubergthal (mb) kept the town alive. Craik and Meacham (sk) rely on environmental sustainability and arts/culture, respectively, in contrast with the picturesque town with the appropriate name of Plum Coulee (mb) plumbing its past for criminal activity and a connection with one of Canada’s most wealthy families. Forgive the plumbing pun; McLachlan herself enjoys a good pun as in her note that Vulcan (ab) faced an astronomical task in emerging as an international Star Trek center. The account of Lynn Lake (mb) adds the important element of one-industry nonagricultural towns devastated by external decisions but reinvented as a tourism center, a similar story to Elbow (sk) where a dam provided new options to its reliance of farming. Warner (ab) capitalized on a supposed Canadian obsession, hockey, but with a twist—girls’ and women’s hockey. Fittingly with one of her other books, McLachlan ends with Inglis (sk), where heritage and saving a grain elevator provided the spark. McLachlan writes in an easy flowing style, making the book a great read. The missing element that she sometimes tantalizes the reader with is the larger structural dynamics at work both in the initial creation of these communities and their subsequent fate. I speak, for example, of the deliberate settlement of the Canadian Plains as part of an industrialization strategy and then the deliberate radical transformation of that strategy fostering depopulation under the pressures of globalization. McLachlan hints at the dynamics of centralization and corporate growth (204), changing federal government policy such as abandoning the once-necessary infrastructure (203); however, these insights remain undeveloped. Additionally, I longed for some comment on the key actors or agents in the changes she describes, and how they organized the various interests in the community to undertake the actions that she describes. But these are the quibbles of a sociologist always wanting analysis of power and the detailed dynamics of social and community change. [End Page 212] This is a very readable and enjoyable book that will bring smiles to the faces and some joy to the hearts of everyone interested in the Great Plains of North America. Murray Knuttila Sociology Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario Copyright © 2014 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,636
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,105
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGreat Plains researchMême sujetRural development and sustainabilityTravaux en français237 207