MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021368496 · doi:10.1353/gpr.2014.0032

Herbert Has Lots for a Buck: How 12 Small Prairie Towns Reinvented Themselves for the 21st Century by Elizabeth McLachlan (review)

2014· article· en· W2021368496 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Murray Knuttila

Bibliographic record

VenueGreat Plains research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Herbert Has Lots for a Buck: How 12 Small Prairie Towns Reinvented Themselves for the 21st Century by Elizabeth McLachlan Murray Knuttila Herbert Has Lots for a Buck: How 12 Small Prairie Towns Reinvented Themselves for the 21st Century. By Elizabeth McLachlan. Edmonton ab: NeWest Press, 2012. 227 pp. $19.95 paper. The small town seems to be a form of social organization endemic to the human condition, nowhere more so than on the North American Plains. Elizabeth McLachlan’s latest chronicle of life in western Canada addresses an important issue that many small towns face—survival in the face of a changing socioeconomic, political, and cultural global world. McLachlan narrates twelve stories of towns in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba that have avoided extinction because they, as the cover states, “reinvented themselves for the twenty-first century.” Virtually every chapter begins with some historical data about the community, followed by depressing portrayals of towns in decline before reinvention. She describes institutional closures and population loss, placing one town on the “verge of disintegration” (111), with “paint peeling or gone, their windows veiled with decades of grime” (23) or more graphically: “Empty storefronts pock the wide main street. A forsaken church has cracked and broken windows” (186). The theme of the book, however, is reinvention and how communities moved away from oblivion. The stories are as varied as the communities—their location, history, options and potentials, and their creativity and determination. Herschel (sk) discovered archeology and pre-Contact history, while Big Valley (ab) focused on the recent history of coal and railroads, making steam train rides and reenactments possible. Rosebud (ab) turned tragedy into hope and renewal with an arts school. The Mennonite traditions of Neubergthal (mb) kept the town alive. Craik and Meacham (sk) rely on environmental sustainability and arts/culture, respectively, in contrast with the picturesque town with the appropriate name of Plum Coulee (mb) plumbing its past for criminal activity and a connection with one of Canada’s most wealthy families. Forgive the plumbing pun; McLachlan herself enjoys a good pun as in her note that Vulcan (ab) faced an astronomical task in emerging as an international Star Trek center. The account of Lynn Lake (mb) adds the important element of one-industry nonagricultural towns devastated by external decisions but reinvented as a tourism center, a similar story to Elbow (sk) where a dam provided new options to its reliance of farming. Warner (ab) capitalized on a supposed Canadian obsession, hockey, but with a twist—girls’ and women’s hockey. Fittingly with one of her other books, McLachlan ends with Inglis (sk), where heritage and saving a grain elevator provided the spark. McLachlan writes in an easy flowing style, making the book a great read. The missing element that she sometimes tantalizes the reader with is the larger structural dynamics at work both in the initial creation of these communities and their subsequent fate. I speak, for example, of the deliberate settlement of the Canadian Plains as part of an industrialization strategy and then the deliberate radical transformation of that strategy fostering depopulation under the pressures of globalization. McLachlan hints at the dynamics of centralization and corporate growth (204), changing federal government policy such as abandoning the once-necessary infrastructure (203); however, these insights remain undeveloped. Additionally, I longed for some comment on the key actors or agents in the changes she describes, and how they organized the various interests in the community to undertake the actions that she describes. But these are the quibbles of a sociologist always wanting analysis of power and the detailed dynamics of social and community change. [End Page 212] This is a very readable and enjoyable book that will bring smiles to the faces and some joy to the hearts of everyone interested in the Great Plains of North America. Murray Knuttila Sociology Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario Copyright © 2014 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreat Plains researchSame topicRural development and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207