An Exemplary Whig: Edward Kent and the Whig Disposition in American Politics and Law
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Seventy men have held the office of Maine governor since statehood in 1820. In An Exemplary Whig David M. Gold outlines in rich detail the life and work of Edward Kent, who served as governor in the years 1838–1839 and 1841–1842. Following the lead of Michael F. Holt in The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party (1999), Gold asserts that the political decisions that had the greatest impact on nineteenth-century Americans happened at the state level. As such, state governors deserve biographical reconsideration from historians. Kent graduated from Harvard University in 1821 and counted his classmate Ralph Waldo Emerson as one of his oldest friends. Rather than pursuing a career in letters, however, he became a Bangor lawyer and drifted into Whig politics. Gold suggests Kent toed the party line on most issues and was indeed an exemplary Whig: he supported Henry Clay's economics of national development and banking, opposed the expansion of slavery, and advocated temperance legislation (Kent was second only to Neal Dow, the father of the “Maine law,” in his long-standing support of stringent liquor laws). On other matters, though, he strayed from the flock. During the imbroglio with Great Britain over the Maine-Canadian border, Governor Kent sided with many Democrats in urging a far northern border and military preparations in case of invasion. His leadership on the northeastern boundary issue led Secretary of State Daniel Webster to tap Kent as one of the New England commissioners during negotiations with Lord Ashburton in the years 1841–1842. His opposition to slavery also had limits, Gold asserts. Rather than following radicals such as Senator Charles Sumner, the conservative Kent feared abolitionist agitation over the Fugitive Slave Law might topple the Union and Constitution. By the Civil War he had transitioned to the Maine Supreme Judicial Court, where, as a Republican justice for fourteen years (1859–1873), rather than turning to legal novelties, he applied the Burkean virtues of prudence and common sense to the law. “Kent's aversion to theorizing may have been related to his admiration for the common law,” Gold writes, When nineteenth century reformers sought to simplify and systematize the law, traditionalists, typically Whigs, defended the common law as the accumulated wisdom of the ages, safe from the momentary passions of political majorities yet flexible enough to adapt to fundamental social changes. (p. 207)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».