199 IN VITRO-DEVELOPED BOVINE BLASTOCYSTS ARE MARKED WITH ABERRANT HYPER- AND HYPO-METHYLATED GENOMIC REGIONS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Most often, in vitro produced embryos display poor quality and altered gene expression patterns compared to their in vivo counterparts. Aberrant DNA methylation occurring during in vitro embryo development is believed to be one of the multifaceted factors which may cause altered gene expression and poor embryo quality. Here, we investigated the genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of in vitro derived embryos using the recently developed Bovine EmbryoGENE Methylation Platform (BEGMP) array (Shojaei Saadi et al. BMC Genomics 2014 15, 451. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-451) to unravel the aberrantly methylated genomic region in in vitro developed embryos. For this, in vitro and in vivo produced blastocysts were produced and used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. In vitro blastocysts were produced from oocytes retrieved from ovaries collected from the local abattoir and matured, fertilized, and cultured in vitro using SOF media. The in vivo blastocysts were produced by superovulation and AI of Simmental heifers followed by uterine flushing. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was then isolated from four replicates (each 10 blastocysts) of in vivo and in vitro derived blastocysts using Allprep DNA/RNA micro kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and the gDNA was then fragmented using the MseI enzyme. Following this, MseLig21 and MseLig were ligated to the MseI-digested genomic fragments in the presence of Ligase enzyme. Methyl-sensitive enzymes, HpaII, AciI, and Hinp1I, were used to cleave unmethlayted genomic regions within the MseI-MseI region of the fragmented DNA. The gDNA was subjected to two rounds of ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction (LM-PCR) amplification. After removal of the adapters, the amplified gDNA samples from in vivo or in vitro groups were labelled either Cy-3 or Cy-5 dyes in dye-swap design using ULS Fluorescent gDNA labelling kit (Kreatech Biotechnology BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Hybridization was performed for 40 h at 65°C. Slides were scanned using Agilent's High-Resolution C Scanner (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and features were extracted with Agilent's Feature Extraction software (Agilent Technologies Inc.). The results have shown that from a total of 414 566 probes harboured by the BEGMP array, 248 453 and 253 147 probes were detected in in vitro and in vivo derived blastocysts, respectively. Data analysis using the linear modelling for microarray (LIMMA) package and R software (The R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) revealed a total of 3434 differentially methylated regions (DMRs; Fold change =1.5, P-value <0.05), of which 42 and 58% were hyper- and hypo-methylated, respectively, in in vitro derived blastocysts compared to their in vivo counterparts. The DMRs were found to be localised in the intronic, exonic, promoter, proximal promoter, and distal promoter, and some of the probes did not have nearby genes. In addition, 10.8% of the DMRs were found to be stretched in short, long, or intermediate CpG islands. Thus, this study demonstrated genome-wide dysregulation in the epigenome landscape of in vitro-derived embryos by the time they reach to the blastocysts stage.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».