199 IN VITRO-DEVELOPED BOVINE BLASTOCYSTS ARE MARKED WITH ABERRANT HYPER- AND HYPO-METHYLATED GENOMIC REGIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most often, in vitro produced embryos display poor quality and altered gene expression patterns compared to their in vivo counterparts. Aberrant DNA methylation occurring during in vitro embryo development is believed to be one of the multifaceted factors which may cause altered gene expression and poor embryo quality. Here, we investigated the genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of in vitro derived embryos using the recently developed Bovine EmbryoGENE Methylation Platform (BEGMP) array (Shojaei Saadi et al. BMC Genomics 2014 15, 451. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-451) to unravel the aberrantly methylated genomic region in in vitro developed embryos. For this, in vitro and in vivo produced blastocysts were produced and used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. In vitro blastocysts were produced from oocytes retrieved from ovaries collected from the local abattoir and matured, fertilized, and cultured in vitro using SOF media. The in vivo blastocysts were produced by superovulation and AI of Simmental heifers followed by uterine flushing. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was then isolated from four replicates (each 10 blastocysts) of in vivo and in vitro derived blastocysts using Allprep DNA/RNA micro kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and the gDNA was then fragmented using the MseI enzyme. Following this, MseLig21 and MseLig were ligated to the MseI-digested genomic fragments in the presence of Ligase enzyme. Methyl-sensitive enzymes, HpaII, AciI, and Hinp1I, were used to cleave unmethlayted genomic regions within the MseI-MseI region of the fragmented DNA. The gDNA was subjected to two rounds of ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction (LM-PCR) amplification. After removal of the adapters, the amplified gDNA samples from in vivo or in vitro groups were labelled either Cy-3 or Cy-5 dyes in dye-swap design using ULS Fluorescent gDNA labelling kit (Kreatech Biotechnology BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Hybridization was performed for 40 h at 65°C. Slides were scanned using Agilent's High-Resolution C Scanner (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and features were extracted with Agilent's Feature Extraction software (Agilent Technologies Inc.). The results have shown that from a total of 414 566 probes harboured by the BEGMP array, 248 453 and 253 147 probes were detected in in vitro and in vivo derived blastocysts, respectively. Data analysis using the linear modelling for microarray (LIMMA) package and R software (The R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) revealed a total of 3434 differentially methylated regions (DMRs; Fold change =1.5, P-value <0.05), of which 42 and 58% were hyper- and hypo-methylated, respectively, in in vitro derived blastocysts compared to their in vivo counterparts. The DMRs were found to be localised in the intronic, exonic, promoter, proximal promoter, and distal promoter, and some of the probes did not have nearby genes. In addition, 10.8% of the DMRs were found to be stretched in short, long, or intermediate CpG islands. Thus, this study demonstrated genome-wide dysregulation in the epigenome landscape of in vitro-derived embryos by the time they reach to the blastocysts stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".