MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2025000835 · doi:10.1080/02722010209481084

Quebec and Latin America Reaffirm Priorities

2002· article· en· W2025000835 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Teresa Gutiérrez-Haces

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Review of Canadian Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLatin AmericansSummitPoliticsPolitical scienceGeographyEconomic historyHistoryLawCartography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Differing Views of Quebec and Latin America In April 2001, Summit of Americas was held in Quebec City and was attended by representatives, high-level politicians, and civil servants of United States, Canada, and all nations of Latin America save Cuba. The object of this meeting was to continue discussing principal aspects of a Free Trade Agreement for Americas, to be negotiated and concluded by thirty-four countries on Latin American continent before year 2005. The fact that province of Quebec was meeting place for this summit meeting was not a random choice, since Latin America has been a point of political, social, cultural, and economic reference at different levels of Quebec society for more than seventy years. Added to this line of reasoning is fact that, when building its identity imagery, Latin America has always been a referential concept for Quebec (Gay 1983; Saragossi 1996). Most analyses of character and history of relations between province of Quebec and countries of Latin America affirm that such interest has appeared even more clearly since Quiet Revolution. In fact, many principles of Quebec's international policy were born during this period and it is logical, therefore, that Latin America should hold an important place within this vision (Mace 1989,1993; Therien, Belanger, Gosselin 1994; Donneur 1994; Balthazar 1993). But, as I will show here, origins of this relationship go back to middle of nineteenth century when, in 1867, four of Britain's North American colonies--Canada, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island--disputed in Quebec City the possibilities offered by Mexican market as a commercial alternative to expansionism of United States' markets (Gutierrez-Haces 1997). Even so, Quebec's presence in Latin America cannot be characterized as a continuous one, nor can it be said that its presence has touched most of countries on American continent, much less can it be affirmed that it has always manifested same impetus, or that it has always carried same weight. This is explained when we take into consideration traits characterizing its own history, as well as degree of Quebec's political and economic development during its transit within confederation of Canada. The purpose of this paper is to draw up an analysis and at same time a re-reading--from point of view of a Latin-American intellectual--of significance of impact Latin America has had on Quebec in four aspects considered as key to developing its international policy. -- The right justifying Quebec's claim as a province for extending its internal sphere of competence to Latin America. -- The inclination shown in Quebec, both individually and as a society, to consider Latin America, Latin Americans, and everything Latin American as a real space and image, in which it can test its ideals and values, and reaffirm its identity. -- The way Latin America has inspired political and social discussion in Quebec on oppression and its exclusion. -- The possibility Latin America offers Quebec to test its discussion of Quebec as a modem and more aggressive society economically than rest of Canada. Because other authors in this same issue are analyzing Quebec's international policies and its relations with United States, Europe, and Asia, my focus here is limited to examining what has occurred in Latin America. Paradoxically, large bibliography of Canadian and Quebec authors proved to be greater than that existing in Latin America, when counting papers devoted to this type of analysis (Mace and Goulet 1996). In fact, intellectual interest aroused by Quebec in Latin American circles has been limited mainly to literary and cultural aspects, which for decades have been widely supported, thanks to Quebec's Francophone-linked policy. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,101
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,730

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,011
Communication savante0,0130,005
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Review of Canadian StudiesMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207