Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differing Views of Quebec and Latin America In April 2001, Summit of Americas was held in Quebec City and was attended by representatives, high-level politicians, and civil servants of United States, Canada, and all nations of Latin America save Cuba. The object of this meeting was to continue discussing principal aspects of a Free Trade Agreement for Americas, to be negotiated and concluded by thirty-four countries on Latin American continent before year 2005. The fact that province of Quebec was meeting place for this summit meeting was not a random choice, since Latin America has been a point of political, social, cultural, and economic reference at different levels of Quebec society for more than seventy years. Added to this line of reasoning is fact that, when building its identity imagery, Latin America has always been a referential concept for Quebec (Gay 1983; Saragossi 1996). Most analyses of character and history of relations between province of Quebec and countries of Latin America affirm that such interest has appeared even more clearly since Quiet Revolution. In fact, many principles of Quebec's international policy were born during this period and it is logical, therefore, that Latin America should hold an important place within this vision (Mace 1989,1993; Therien, Belanger, Gosselin 1994; Donneur 1994; Balthazar 1993). But, as I will show here, origins of this relationship go back to middle of nineteenth century when, in 1867, four of Britain's North American colonies--Canada, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island--disputed in Quebec City the possibilities offered by Mexican market as a commercial alternative to expansionism of United States' markets (Gutierrez-Haces 1997). Even so, Quebec's presence in Latin America cannot be characterized as a continuous one, nor can it be said that its presence has touched most of countries on American continent, much less can it be affirmed that it has always manifested same impetus, or that it has always carried same weight. This is explained when we take into consideration traits characterizing its own history, as well as degree of Quebec's political and economic development during its transit within confederation of Canada. The purpose of this paper is to draw up an analysis and at same time a re-reading--from point of view of a Latin-American intellectual--of significance of impact Latin America has had on Quebec in four aspects considered as key to developing its international policy. -- The right justifying Quebec's claim as a province for extending its internal sphere of competence to Latin America. -- The inclination shown in Quebec, both individually and as a society, to consider Latin America, Latin Americans, and everything Latin American as a real space and image, in which it can test its ideals and values, and reaffirm its identity. -- The way Latin America has inspired political and social discussion in Quebec on oppression and its exclusion. -- The possibility Latin America offers Quebec to test its discussion of Quebec as a modem and more aggressive society economically than rest of Canada. Because other authors in this same issue are analyzing Quebec's international policies and its relations with United States, Europe, and Asia, my focus here is limited to examining what has occurred in Latin America. Paradoxically, large bibliography of Canadian and Quebec authors proved to be greater than that existing in Latin America, when counting papers devoted to this type of analysis (Mace and Goulet 1996). In fact, intellectual interest aroused by Quebec in Latin American circles has been limited mainly to literary and cultural aspects, which for decades have been widely supported, thanks to Quebec's Francophone-linked policy. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".