Between caution and controversy: lessons from the Gulf Arab states as (re-)emerging donors
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The history of Gulf donorship, its trajectory and underlying motivations, continues to be an understudied aspect of foreign aid. While the Gulf Arab states are not new donors, their manner of regional coordination, branding, and aid management are distinct. Often helping fellow countries of the South, particularly Arab and Muslim countries, these countries have moved towards stronger private sector involvement and into social spending programmes. Owing to their oil wealth, Gulf Arab states' are increasingly generous and yet they are also cautious after 9/11 about how and by whom their aid is channelled. Nevertheless, with oscillations in oil prices, continued controversy over rising Islamism post-Arab-Spring, the future of Gulf aid remains a valuable subject of study. Notes 1 This article specifically looks at the six member states of the GCC: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. We use the terms ‘Gulf Arab’, ‘GCC’ and ‘Gulf’ in reference to this subregion of the greater MENA region. Although we acknowledge that Iran and Iraq are part of the geographic Gulf region, we are specifically examining the Gulf states that currently retain membership in the GCC. 2 The Goldman-Sachs acronym ‘BRICs’, of course, also includes Russia as a re-emerging economy. 3 The lack of data available from the Gulf Arab states is well known among regional researchers, and was discussed at length by Shushan and Marcoux (Citation2011) in relation to aid data. In 2008, the former director of the UN Millennium Campaign, Salil Shetty, was quoted in an article as decrying the lack of ‘clear numbers’ on aid contributions from Gulf Arab states, noting, ‘it's very opaque. There needs to be more transparency’ (Abocar Citation2008). 4 In just the last year, we have also seen funding packages within the GCC. Specifically, the GCC developed a US$20 billion aid package for Bahrain and Oman, prompted by their protest movements in the shadow of the Arab Spring. This was coupled with vast domestic spending in each country, which included (in varying forms and combinations) subsidy increases, salary hikes and the sudden offer of public sector jobs in the thousands (Bladd Citation2011; Ulrichsen Citation2011).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle