Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Accessible online at: www.karger.com/journals/fpl It is hard to believe that my 3-year term as IALP President is now completed, years that have comprised so much hard work, such a lot of fun, friendship and pleasure, but also some frustration. The frustration may not be as negative as it sounds, however, as it also contains a promise about the great potentials for the future of our Association. Let me come back to that later on. IALP is a fantastic organisation! Just imagine a world society that without discrimination with respect to race, gender, religion or cultural differences offers a platform for people all over the world to share knowledge and form networks based on professional needs and friendship. This is also a wonderful chance of finding out how much we really have in common regardless of linguistic and cultural differences in our common efforts to assist people with communication disorders. IALP is an old venerable association. In 1999, it celebrated its 75th anniversary with the Goteborg Composium, where many distinguished scholars were invited to present the state of the art within the various IALP domains. Just before the anniversary, the fourth edition of the IALP History was published thanks to the dedicated work of many IALP members. This is indeed interesting reading, where the growth of the Association can be followed from its foundation in 1924. The 2001 congress in Montreal will be the 25th one and with the next congress in Brisbane, Australia, all continents will have hosted at least one IALP congress, thereby stressing the globality of the Association. Serving in an established organisation in many ways means challenges. It goes without saying that many traditions that have developed over the years within IALP reflect different ways of looking at things and ways that are not very suitable for our modern world and our way of thinking. We certainly must take advantage of new techniques that in so many ways can improve and also certainly have improved our work in IALP, but we must be careful in our efforts to modernise, so that we do not cut the links to the past. I think we owe that to our predecessors. One of the challenges and also one of the frustrations is to make IALP better known. As it now is, IALP is both too big and too small. The organisation is too big to be run exclusively on a voluntary basis, if we want to live up to our ambitious plans. It is too small to afford projects that require a substantial financial support. We need to grow and to inform colleagues all over the world about
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».