Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accessible online at: www.karger.com/journals/fpl It is hard to believe that my 3-year term as IALP President is now completed, years that have comprised so much hard work, such a lot of fun, friendship and pleasure, but also some frustration. The frustration may not be as negative as it sounds, however, as it also contains a promise about the great potentials for the future of our Association. Let me come back to that later on. IALP is a fantastic organisation! Just imagine a world society that without discrimination with respect to race, gender, religion or cultural differences offers a platform for people all over the world to share knowledge and form networks based on professional needs and friendship. This is also a wonderful chance of finding out how much we really have in common regardless of linguistic and cultural differences in our common efforts to assist people with communication disorders. IALP is an old venerable association. In 1999, it celebrated its 75th anniversary with the Goteborg Composium, where many distinguished scholars were invited to present the state of the art within the various IALP domains. Just before the anniversary, the fourth edition of the IALP History was published thanks to the dedicated work of many IALP members. This is indeed interesting reading, where the growth of the Association can be followed from its foundation in 1924. The 2001 congress in Montreal will be the 25th one and with the next congress in Brisbane, Australia, all continents will have hosted at least one IALP congress, thereby stressing the globality of the Association. Serving in an established organisation in many ways means challenges. It goes without saying that many traditions that have developed over the years within IALP reflect different ways of looking at things and ways that are not very suitable for our modern world and our way of thinking. We certainly must take advantage of new techniques that in so many ways can improve and also certainly have improved our work in IALP, but we must be careful in our efforts to modernise, so that we do not cut the links to the past. I think we owe that to our predecessors. One of the challenges and also one of the frustrations is to make IALP better known. As it now is, IALP is both too big and too small. The organisation is too big to be run exclusively on a voluntary basis, if we want to live up to our ambitious plans. It is too small to afford projects that require a substantial financial support. We need to grow and to inform colleagues all over the world about
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".