Comment on “Toxicity of weathered<i>Exxon Valdez</i>crude oil to pink salmon embryos”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVolume 27, Issue 7 p. 1475-1476 Letter to the Editor Comment on "Toxicity of weathered Exxon Valdez crude oil to pink salmon embryos" Ron A. Heintz, Ron A. Heintz National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratory Juneau, Alaska 99801, USASearch for more papers by this authorJeffrey W. Short, Jeffrey W. Short National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratory Juneau, Alaska 99801, USASearch for more papers by this authorStanley D. Rice, Stanley D. Rice National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratory Juneau, Alaska 99801, USASearch for more papers by this authorMark G. Carls, Mark G. Carls National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratory Juneau, Alaska 99801, USASearch for more papers by this author Ron A. Heintz, Ron A. Heintz National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratory Juneau, Alaska 99801, USASearch for more papers by this authorJeffrey W. Short, Jeffrey W. Short National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratory Juneau, Alaska 99801, USASearch for more papers by this authorStanley D. Rice, Stanley D. Rice National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratory Juneau, Alaska 99801, USASearch for more papers by this authorMark G. Carls, Mark G. Carls National Marine Fisheries Service Auke Bay Laboratory Juneau, Alaska 99801, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 09 December 2009 https://doi.org/10.1897/07-236.1Citations: 1Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1 Brannon EL, Collins KM, Brown JS, Neff JM, Parker KR, Stubblefield WA. 2006. Toxicity of weathered Exxon Valdez crude oil to pink salmon embryos. Environ Toxicol Chem 25: 962–972. 10.1897/05-129R1.1 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2 Carls MG, Rice SD, Hose JE. 1999. Sensitivity of fish embryos to weathered crude oil: Part I. Low-level exposure during incubation causes malformations, genetic damage, and mortality in larval Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi). Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 481–493. 10.1002/etc.5620180317 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Carls MG, Heintz RA, Marty GD, Rice SD. 2005. Cytochrome P4501A induction in oil-exposed pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) embryos predicts reduced survival potential. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 301: 253–265. 10.3354/meps301253 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 Heintz RA, Short JW, Rice SD. 1999. Sensitivity of fish embryos to weathered crude oil: Part II. Increased mortality of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) embryos incubating downstream from weathered Exxon Valdez crude oil. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 494–503. 10.1002/etc.5620180318 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Heintz RA, Rice SD, Wertheimer AC, Bradshaw RF, Thrower FP, Joyce JE, Short JW. 2000. Delayed effects on growth and marine survival of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) after exposure to crude oil during embryonic development. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 208: 205–216. 10.3354/meps208205 Web of Science®Google Scholar 6 Marty GD, Short JW, Dambach DM, Willits NH, Heintz RA, Rice SD, Stegeman JJ, Hinton DE. 1997. Ascites, premature emergence, increased gonadal cell apoptosis, and cytochrome P4501A induction in pink salmon larvae continuously exposed to oil-contaminated gravel during development. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 75: 989–1007. 10.1139/z97-120 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Carls MG, Thomas RE, Lilly MR, Rice SD. 2003. Mechanism for transport of oil-contaminated groundwater into pink salmon redds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 248: 245–255. 10.3354/meps248245 Web of Science®Google Scholar 8 Carls MG, Rice SD, Marty GD, Naydan DK. 2004. Pink salmon spawning habitat is recovering a decade after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Trans Am Fish Soc 133: 834–844. 10.1577/T03-125.1 Web of Science®Google Scholar 9 Bue BG, Sharr S, Moffitt SD, Craig AK. 1996. Effects of the Exxon Valdez oil spill on pink salmon embryos and preemergent fry. American Fisheries Society Symposium 18: 619–627. CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Bue BG, Sharr S, Seeb JE. 1998. Evidence of damage to pink salmon populations inhabiting Prince William Sound, Alaska, two generations after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Trans Am Fish Soc 127: 35–43. 10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127<0035:EODTPS>2.0.CO;2 Web of Science®Google Scholar 11 Carls MG, Marty GD, Meyers TR, Thomas RE, Rice SD. 1998. Expression of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus in prespawning Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) exposed to weathered crude oil. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55: 2300–2309. 10.1139/cjfas-55-10-2300 Web of Science®Google Scholar 12 Payne JR, Driskell WB, Short JW. 2004. Prince William Sound RCAC long-term environmental monitoring program, 2003–2004 LTEMP monitoring report. Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council, Anchorage, AK, USA. Google Scholar 13 Kiparissis Y, Akhtar P, Hodson PV, Brown RS. 2003. Partition-controlled delivery of toxicants: A novel in vivo approach for embryo toxicity testing. Environ Sci Technol 37: 2262–2266. 10.1021/es026154r CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Rhodes S, Farwell A, Hewitt LM, MacKinnon M, Dixon DG. 2005. The effects of dimethylated and alkylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the embryonic development of the Japanese medaka. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60: 247–258. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.08.002 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15 Farwell A, Nero V, Croft M, Bal P, Dixon DG. 2006. Modified Japanese medaka embryo-larval bioassay for rapid determination of developmental abnormalities. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 51: 600–607. 10.1007/s00244-005-0319-x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume27, Issue7July 2008Pages 1475-1476 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».