MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2027831463 · doi:10.1353/ecf.0.0025

Two French Libertine Novels: “The Story of Madame de Luz” and “The Confessions of the Comte de ***,” (review)

2008· article· en· W2027831463 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ruth P. Thomas

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReignMemoirGermanArtLiteraturePoliticsFavouriteArt historyClassicsPhilosophyTheologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Two French Libertine Novels: “The Story of Madame de Luz” and “The Confessions of the Comte de ***,” Ruth P. Thomas (bio) Charles Pinot-Duclos. Two French Libertine Novels: “The Story of Madame de Luz” and “The Confessions of the Comte de ***,” trans. and intro. Douglas Parmée. Brooklyn: AMS Press, 2006. xxvi+192 pp. US$64.50. ISBN 978-0-404-63546-6. For his contemporaries, Charles Pinot-Duclos (1704–72) was a prominent figure in eighteenth-century French life and letters. A habitué of the aristocratic salons, where he was welcomed in spite of his plebeian origins (his father was a hat maker), he also frequented the literary and political cafés, mingling with the intellectuals and artists of his era. Witty, known for his blunt, even coarse, speech, and well connected, he held a number of official positions: Secretary of the Académie française and Royal Historiographer, in addition to, briefly, public office as mayor of Dinan, where he was born. A prolific writer, Duclos penned memoirs and histories on subjects as diverse as the reign of Louis xi and the origins of the French language. He also wrote plays and fiction. The Story of Madame de Luz was widely read, and The Confessions of the Comte de *** was one of the most published and read novels of the eighteenth century, with eight editions during the first year and translations into English and German. The nineteenth century recognized Duclos as a historian and moralist—and Stendhal considered him his favourite author—but his novels (like many written during his era) were less appreciated. The rediscovery of the eighteenth-century novel towards the middle of the twentieth century, canonized in a Pléiade edition, has lead to a reconsideration of Duclos as a novelist of manners who observes and analyses his own society in order to understand the pro found significance of human social experience. Most recently, the interest in libertine novels—the anthologies of Raymond Trousson and Patrick Wald Lasowski, the [End Page 597] latter’s again in a Pléiade edition, and the critical studies of Claude Reichler, Colette Cazenobe, and others, as well as Nancy K. Miller, who compares the libertine and sentimental novel—has fixed critical attention on Duclos. So a new translation of his first two novels seems particularly timely. While the term libertin was used in the seventeenth century to describe free thinkers who challenged religious and moral codes, the eighteenth-century libertine novel is associated with amorous and licentious behaviour. Responding to and defying the social constraints of the ancien régime, the libertine novel takes a variety of forms from the Regency to the Revolution, from Crébillon fils to Sade, and ranges from the philosophical to the pornographic. The common dominator is the search for pleasure, linked to the will for power and the satisfaction of the ego. Male-authored libertine novels insist on male privilege, and they record seduction and betrayal most often in an aristocratic and worldly milieu. Women, however, are not always victims: libertinage has been compared to a game among equals. The Confessions of the Comte de *** (1741) is in many ways prototypical. Using the popular convention of the memoir novel, the mature hero, like those of Crébillon and Marivaux, looks back with irony on the “folly and errors” (84) of his youth. He presents his tale as a moral lesson and peppers his account with maxims recalling those of La Rochefoucauld, as he chronicles for a young relative his twenty-year career as un homme à la mode and lists the women who have participated in his sexual and social education. His brief portraits have been compared to the Caractères of La Bruyère, although his contemporaries identified some of the characters (for example, Mme de Tonins, who is described along with her salon, is generally considered to be modelled on Mme de Tencin). No real seduction occurs, since the hero picks women whose conquest is certain, nor does he linger on descriptions of pleasure, for all his liaisons are basically the same. The Count becomes more introspective and altruistic in the second part of the novel. He tries to convince...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetHistorical Art and Culture StudiesTravaux en français237 207